Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (16 Viewers)

  • Thread starter BackRoomRummermill
  • Start date Feb 23, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 940
  • 941
  • 942
  • 943
  • 944
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 942 of 1666 Next Last

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 30, 2020
  • #32,936
David O'Day said:
cases and deaths deffo moving in wrong direction
Click to expand...
Deaths can only go one way for a while. It'll get worse before it gets better as the numbers in hospital and ventilators pile up, plus lots of outbreaks in care homes as well
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 30, 2020
  • #32,937
fernandopartridge said:
Deaths can only go one way for a while. It'll get worse before it gets better as the numbers in hospital and ventilators pile up, plus lots of outbreaks in care homes as well
Click to expand...

Johnson today seemed to basically be giving up as well which is worrying. He's been shit but now he looks beaten as well.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 30, 2020
  • #32,938
David O'Day said:
Johnson today seemed to basically be giving up as well which is worrying. He's been shit but now he looks beaten as well.
Click to expand...

If it was anyone else I'd feel sorry for him
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 30, 2020
  • #32,939
David O'Day said:
Johnson today seemed to basically be giving up as well which is worrying. He's been shit but now he looks beaten as well.
Click to expand...
I think some of that was to try and deflect criticism of the sweeping powers they've given themselves without parliamentary debate
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 30, 2020
  • #32,940
fernandopartridge said:
I think some of that was to try and deflect criticism of the sweeping powers they've given themselves without parliamentary debate
Click to expand...

But the bluster is gone, he knows it's all going wrong and everyone is going to blame him.
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 30, 2020
  • #32,941
fernandopartridge said:
I read something about the 'HEPA' air filters on flights being particularly effective at removing corona particles from the air.
Click to expand...
According to Aeromexico (owned by Delta) the HEPA air filters are the same ones used in Hospitals and removes 99.9% of bacteria from the air.

As someone else said, I would much prefer to be on a flight than in a bar, or an underground or subway or whatever.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,942
David O'Day said:
But the bluster is gone, he knows it's all going wrong and everyone is going to blame him.
Click to expand...

I could've saved him the bother within 10 minutes of first becoming aware of him all those years ago on HIGNFY. Clear immediately this was not a man whose name was never going to be synonomous with competence.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,943
In more positive news.....

Imperial college have indicated that R rate has actually fallen (from 1.5/1.7 to around 1.1) in recent days. If this is correct it might’ve been the initial briefings a week or two ago that might’ve jolted the public out of what was becoming a more complacent approach to the virus. Too early to tell for sure as their sample testing might not be representative of the local spikes

Looking at the info provided in the briefIng yesterday:

There is substantial capacity in the NHS (inc 30k ventilators)
Even though schools have reopened the virus and therefore case numbers are not currently rising exponentially in school aged kids. Hopefully this message will reduce the numbers of kids getting tested (I’m guessing when they have colds etc), which will free up testing capacity for those of higher risk.

All a bit early for judgments but let’s hope the better news continues (even though Id expect numbers to continue to increase for a bit yet - especially I’m guessing around uni’s)

Ps Keeping a close eye on France and Spain to see if their high case numbers translate to high death numbers. Although higher still appear under control(ish) at present. Fingers crossed
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,944
CCFCSteve said:
In more positive news.....

Imperial college have indicated that R rate has actually fallen (from 1.5/1.7 to around 1.1) in recent days. If this is correct it might’ve been the initial briefings a week or two ago that might’ve jolted the public out of what was becoming a more complacent approach to the virus. Too early to tell for sure as their sample testing might not be representative of the local spikes

Looking at the info provided in the briefIng yesterday:

There is substantial capacity in the NHS (inc 30k ventilators)
Even though schools have reopened the virus and therefore case numbers are not currently rising exponentially in school aged kids. Hopefully this message will reduce the numbers of kids getting tested (I’m guessing when they have colds etc), which will free up testing capacity for those of higher risk.

All a bit early for judgments but let’s hope the better news continues (even though Id expect numbers to continue to increase for a bit yet - especially I’m guessing around uni’s)

Ps Keeping a close eye on France and Spain to see if their high case numbers translate to high death numbers. Although higher still appear under control(ish) at present. Fingers crossed
Click to expand...
If it’s correct we can get the bunting out. Boris has actually got something right. First for everything and if that is the case I only applaud his response, even if he himself didn’t understand what that response was.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,945
skybluetony176 said:
If it’s correct we can get the bunting out. Boris has actually got something right. First for everything and if that is the case I only applaud his response, even if he himself didn’t understand what that response was.
Click to expand...

It's a big if and would be disputed by the public health officials on the ground.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,946
robbiekeane said:
According to Aeromexico (owned by Delta) the HEPA air filters are the same ones used in Hospitals and removes 99.9% of bacteria from the air.

As someone else said, I would much prefer to be on a flight than in a bar, or an underground or subway or whatever.
Click to expand...

This is why it’s wrong not to have a smoking section on planes. Just saying.
 
Reactions: wingy

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,947
CCFCSteve said:
In more positive news.....

Imperial college have indicated that R rate has actually fallen (from 1.5/1.7 to around 1.1) in recent days. If this is correct it might’ve been the initial briefings a week or two ago that might’ve jolted the public out of what was becoming a more complacent approach to the virus. Too early to tell for sure as their sample testing might not be representative of the local spikes

Looking at the info provided in the briefIng yesterday:

There is substantial capacity in the NHS (inc 30k ventilators)
Even though schools have reopened the virus and therefore case numbers are not currently rising exponentially in school aged kids. Hopefully this message will reduce the numbers of kids getting tested (I’m guessing when they have colds etc), which will free up testing capacity for those of higher risk.

All a bit early for judgments but let’s hope the better news continues (even though Id expect numbers to continue to increase for a bit yet - especially I’m guessing around uni’s)

Ps Keeping a close eye on France and Spain to see if their high case numbers translate to high death numbers. Although higher still appear under control(ish) at present. Fingers crossed
Click to expand...

Great news if the trend holds up. Little wary of the national survey as I’m not sure if this is the higher resolution one that can spot localised outbreaks, but it’s probably the best dataset we’ve got.

On the kids point, I doubt it’ll do much. Schools still want a negative test before they let kids back in so the motivation for parents is still there.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,948
shmmeee said:
Great news if the trend holds up. Little wary of the national survey as I’m not sure if this is the higher resolution one that can spot localised outbreaks, but it’s probably the best dataset we’ve got.

On the kids point, I doubt it’ll do much. Schools still want a negative test before they let kids back in so the motivation for parents is still there.
Click to expand...

I don't think the national survey is very good for working this out anymore. It's dataset is worked out for the country as a whole so it will miss localised outbreaks. Remember places like Liverpool, Newcastle, Manchester and others have x10 as many cases per 100k as the England average so lower spreading areas will drive down the the national average on most things. Looking at the local figures in these places the R rate is still well above 1.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,949
David O'Day said:
I don't think the national survey is very good for working this out anymore. It's dataset is worked out for the country as a whole so it will miss localised outbreaks. Remember places like Liverpool, Newcastle, Manchester and others have x10 as many cases per 100k as the England average so lower spreading areas will drive down the the national average on most things. Looking at the local figures in these places the R rate is still well above 1.
Click to expand...
The first important point is to always make sure you're comparing the same source. The R number given by Imperial has been very different from the one given by the government so people need to be careful not to interchange the two.

The second point is the margin of error. The headline figure is 1.1 but the report itself says it could be anywhere between 0.7 to 1.5 compared to a headline figure of 1.7 a month ago.

And of course anything over 1 means that overall its heading in the wrong direction. Unfortunately they only seem to release results monthly so it will be a while before we see if the downward trend continues and hopefully goes below 1.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,950
CCFCSteve said:
Looking at the info provided in the briefIng yesterday:

There is substantial capacity in the NHS (inc 30k ventilators)
Click to expand...
Found this slide pretty alarming in the briefing yesterday.

 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,951
chiefdave said:
The first important point is to always make sure you're comparing the same source. The R number given by Imperial has been very different from the one given by the government so people need to be careful not to interchange the two.

The second point is the margin of error. The headline figure is 1.1 but the report itself says it could be anywhere between 0.7 to 1.5 compared to a headline figure of 1.7 a month ago.

And of course anything over 1 means that overall its heading in the wrong direction. Unfortunately they only seem to release results monthly so it will be a while before we see if the downward trend continues and hopefully goes below 1.
Click to expand...
Yeah a lot of data appears,but not on a consistent measure,be that time or demographics.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,952
David O'Day said:
I don't think the national survey is very good for working this out anymore. It's dataset is worked out for the country as a whole so it will miss localised outbreaks. Remember places like Liverpool, Newcastle, Manchester and others have x10 as many cases per 100k as the England average so lower spreading areas will drive down the the national average on most things. Looking at the local figures in these places the R rate is still well above 1.
Click to expand...

I did say as much, I heard they were looking to increase its resolution to make it better though, not sure if that’s happened or still planned.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,953
chiefdave said:
Found this slide pretty alarming in the briefing yesterday.

View attachment 17119
Click to expand...

Yeah, agree, anything where theres a rapid rise it is concerning (but probably expected following the increased case numbers). The vertical axis is also only currently 0 to 0.45 per 100k so even relatively low increases by number will appear more significant on the graph (not that this should be ignored)
 
Reactions: robbiekeane
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,954
David O'Day said:
I don't think the national survey is very good for working this out anymore. It's dataset is worked out for the country as a whole so it will miss localised outbreaks. Remember places like Liverpool, Newcastle, Manchester and others have x10 as many cases per 100k as the England average so lower spreading areas will drive down the the national average on most things. Looking at the local figures in these places the R rate is still well above 1.
Click to expand...

Agree. To be honest I agree with the localised approach/measures at present due to this fact

Ps still hoping the rate of increase is being brought back under control though
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,955
shmmeee said:
This is why it’s wrong not to have a smoking section on planes. Just saying.
Click to expand...

I did hear that since smoking got banned on flights air quality has actually got poorer on planes because they recycle the air less to cut costs. When there was smoke in the air they had to pump fresh air in far more often.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,956
CCFCSteve said:
Agree. To be honest I agree with the localised approach/measures at present due to this fact

Ps still hoping the rate of increase is being brought back under control though
Click to expand...
Local areas maybe need to be bigger though. Was daft Teesside not being included until now, you could say Midlands is right on the cusp all around.

You're OK if you live in Devon, though!
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,957
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I did hear that since smoking got banned on flights air quality has actually got poorer on planes because they recycle the air less to cut costs. When there was smoke in the air they had to pump fresh air in far more often.
Click to expand...
Said a spokesman for the tobacco industry. I think it turned out to be a complete urban myth IIRC.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,958

Second wave of coronavirus is here says Cov Hospital chief

He said the number of Covid-19 cases at the hospital has been rising over the past three weeks
www.coventrytelegraph.net
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,959
skybluetony176 said:
Said a spokesman for the tobacco industry. I think it turned out to be a complete urban myth IIRC.
Click to expand...

I think it was a report that more people were getting nauseous on flights and developing colds etc after flights.

You may be right as I didn't follow it up to check.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,960
Just had a google, found one letter to a flight magazine and a couple of reports saying the claims don’t hold up plus a couple of papers showing the impacts of second hand smoke on cabin crew.

Fair to say it’s probably bollocks. Ah well, I should probably just quit
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,961
chiefdave said:
Found this slide pretty alarming in the briefing yesterday.

View attachment 17119
Click to expand...
Found that a bit confusing given the rate per 100k in the percieved problem area's.
Somehow it must be age related?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,962
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I think it was a report that more people were getting nauseous on flights and developing colds etc after flights.

You may be right as I didn't follow it up to check.
Click to expand...
Can vouch for the infection after flights
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,963
Hartlepool.
80% of cases are occurring when households mix.
The solution to that one should be relatively simple?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,964
The evidence against Hancock piles up, this is disgraceful:

Nurses barred from NHS 111 Covid clinical division after 60% of calls unsafe

Concern grows over 111 guidance after audit of clinical calls handled by nurses, paramedics and physios
www.theguardian.com
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,965
wingy said:
Hartlepool.
80% of cases are occurring when households mix.
The solution to that one should be relatively simple?
Click to expand...

Go to surrounding areas to mix so the Hartlepool figures drop?
 
Reactions: wingy
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,966
Nick said:
Go to surrounding areas to mix so the Hartlepool figures drop?
Click to expand...
You wouldn't want to go to Stockton, even if you are a mean, moody, killer virus!
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,967
Deleted member 5849 said:
You wouldn't want to go to Stockton, even if you are a mean, moody, killer virus!
Click to expand...
There's a nice pub by the canal
 
Reactions: Alan Dugdales Moustache
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,968
I know there will be point's made about accuracy, but if it's instant does it not better conventional testing due to errors and delay there.
Also the price £150 quoted at one point but the price of a paperback further in .
Which is it,cos it's a factor of at least 15.

Airport Covid testing could start within weeks, says Heathrow chief

Two-test model could cut quarantine period in half, and allow popular London-New York route to reopen next month
www.theguardian.com
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,969

MP Margaret Ferrier's Covid Parliament trip 'indefensible'

SNP MP Margaret Ferrier is facing calls to resign after she was suspended by her party.
www.bbc.co.uk
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 1, 2020
  • #32,970
Leadership

Covid cases doubled under most local lockdowns in England

Exclusive: Confusing rules blamed for rise in infections in 11 of 16 towns and cities under long-term restrictions
www.theguardian.com
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 940
  • 941
  • 942
  • 943
  • 944
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 942 of 1666 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 12 (members: 0, guests: 12)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?