Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (22 Viewers)

  • Thread starter BackRoomRummermill
  • Start date Feb 23, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 906
  • 907
  • 908
  • 909
  • 910
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 908 of 1666 Next Last
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,746
Ian1779 said:
Do you not think a profession with a huge recruitment crisis might not have already thought about these things generally before Cov-ID. I can’t see the added ‘incentive’ of you may die being a seller to be honest.
Click to expand...

It’s alright G just volunteered to do my A level classes by Zoom
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,747
skybluetony176 said:
Sweden just this week admitted that they got it wrong. Not really sure what point you think you’re making there but whatever it is Sweden disagrees with you.
Click to expand...

Sweden’s a funny one. I’ve seen some comments (from inside and out) thinking they fucked up, others not. Nobody will know until you look back in years to come and see the deaths/illnesses over the period of the whole outbreak and the impact of lockdowns (on economy, schooling and other illnesses)

It's bordering on impossible to compare countries anyway though, Ive read Sweden has a massive percentage (40%) of single occupiers with no kids, so the household spread (highest risk of contagion) is likely to be far more limited over there. It’s why there’s been a massive problem with household spread of different ethnicities in this country (not really ever mentioned but if anyone looks at the data on the surveillance reports, it’s stark)

That’s before you go into density of certain populations, cultures, obedience to laws etc etc
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,748
Ian1779 said:
Ultimately we have no control outside of the school gates. That falls on the parents and kids themselves, and all the measures we put in place can only mitigate as best we can.
Click to expand...
You're right. I have the misfortune to live fairly close to a large primary school and to walk past the kids and parents at start and end of school you wouldn't think coronavirus even existed.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,749
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
You're right. I have the misfortune to live fairly close to a large primary school and to walk past the kids and parents at start and end of school you wouldn't think coronavirus even existed.
Click to expand...

As a newly retired teacher would you help out again to cover if asked?
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,750
Grendel said:
You quoted New Zealand - when did they reopen schools
Click to expand...

There were more deaths in single care homes than the entirety of their country.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,751
Ian1779 said:
There were more deaths in single care homes than the entirety of their country.
Click to expand...

So which other country would you like to benchmark school policy on or are we utterly unique?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,752
I am tempted to say something which will cause total outrage regarding this nonsense
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,753
Pubs and restaurants need to go I think. Encourage WFH again. Fuck knows to be honest. If testing was there and people would isolate and follow the guidelines we’d probably need nothing.

Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
In short, the problems are not in schools, it's at the school gates, it's arriving and leaving. Social distancing doesn't exist .
Click to expand...

This. I have to wait ten minutes between dropping the kids off because of staggered start times, just means a massive throng of parents waiting for their turn next to each other.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,754
Grendel said:
I am tempted to say something which will cause total outrage
Click to expand...
Doesn't normally stop you, tbf
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,755
Deleted member 5849 said:
Doesn't normally stop you, tbf
Click to expand...

Could be a shocker
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,756
Grendel said:
So which other country would you like to benchmark school policy on or are we utterly unique?
Click to expand...

Depends if you can find another country so utterly incapable of managing this pandemic generally, or specifically a testing system that really needed to be robust enough to cope, yet also capable enough to see that this was going to happen a mile off.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,757
Ian1779 said:
Depends if you can find another country so utterly incapable of managing this pandemic generally, or specifically a testing system that really needed to be robust enough to cope, yet also capable enough to see that this was going to happen a mile off.
Click to expand...

Not really as cases are escalating all over Europe whatever actions were taken Ian - Classic misdirection
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,758
Ian1779 said:
Depends if you can find another country so utterly incapable of managing this pandemic generally, or specifically a testing system that really needed to be robust enough to cope, yet also capable enough to see that this was going to happen a mile off.
Click to expand...
It all went very quiet on the suggestion that things like pubs would have to close, once schools were opened.

tbf it's difficult - far harder to close, open, close something than just do one or t'other, but it does look like we're just crossing our fingers atm. Maybe I'm wrong, and a plan will be announced, but there's little sign of it.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,759
Grendel said:
Could be a shocker
Click to expand...

Go on, treat yourself
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,760
Deleted member 5849 said:
It all went very quiet on the suggestion that things like pubs would have to close, once schools were opened.

tbf it's difficult - far harder to close, open, close something than just do one or t'other, but it does look like we're just crossing our fingers atm. Maybe I'm wrong, and a plan will be announced, but there's little sign of it.
Click to expand...

It sounds like (and I’m guessing and taking some bits from what I’ve read/heard), that next it will be pubs closing earlier/curfews.

The highest risk of contagion still appears household related, when other areas start catching up they’ll have to start closing them.

I’ve said before though, my personal view (for what it’s worth) is it makes sense to keep it location/regional based for time being. There is no point enforcing measures on remote areas when they are pretty much unaffected by Covid.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,761
Grendel said:
Classic misdirection
Click to expand...

Being the expert of said term I’ll bow to your undoubted experience in the matter.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,762
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Go on, treat yourself
Click to expand...

I have some views on the whole nonsense that I suspect are aligned with yours

The whole thing is ridiculous as the vast majority of people are unaffected so it’s hysteria which I have seen before in the 80s

it would surely be more sensible to have a policy to encourage society to behave like normal but protect the vulnerable with information. Most vulnerable people are old and some have conditions so advise them to isolate if they wish - 99% of the whole population won’t be impacted and most that will are the older generation who don’t work. So get public information films around this. Have supermarkets open to vulnerable groups only at certain. Times. Have Pubs and cafes with set areas for these people,

protect the tiny minority at risk and not punish the massive majority
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,763
Grendel said:
I have some views on the whole nonsense that I suspect are aligned with yours

The whole thing is ridiculous as the vast majority of people are unaffected so it’s hysteria which I have seen before in the 80s

it would surely be more sensible to have a policy to encourage society to behave like normal but protect the vulnerable with information. Most vulnerable people are old and some have conditions so advise them to isolate if they wish - 99% of the whole population won’t be impacted and most that will are the older generation who don’t work. So get public information films around this. Have supermarkets open to vulnerable groups only at certain. Times. Have Pubs and cafes with set areas for these people,

protect the tiny minority at risk and not punish the massive majority
Click to expand...

As it happens I completely agree but in school I wouldn’t dream of saying it.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,764
Deleted member 5849 said:
It all went very quiet on the suggestion that things like pubs would have to close, once schools were opened.

tbf it's difficult - far harder to close, open, close something than just do one or t'other, but it does look like we're just crossing our fingers atm. Maybe I'm wrong, and a plan will be announced, but there's little sign of it.
Click to expand...

We’re only saying what we are experiencing on the ground day to day. We are 13 days into the new school year and national attendance is at 85%.

A plan needs to be in place to arrest this situation.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,765
Grendel said:
I have some views on the whole nonsense that I suspect are aligned with yours

The whole thing is ridiculous as the vast majority of people are unaffected so it’s hysteria which I have seen before in the 80s

it would surely be more sensible to have a policy to encourage society to behave like normal but protect the vulnerable with information. Most vulnerable people are old and some have conditions so advise them to isolate if they wish - 99% of the whole population won’t be impacted and most that will are the older generation who don’t work. So get public information films around this. Have supermarkets open to vulnerable groups only at certain. Times. Have Pubs and cafes with set areas for these people,

protect the tiny minority at risk and not punish the massive majority
Click to expand...
I expected more outrage causing, tbh
 
Reactions: shmmeee

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,766
Grendel said:
I have some views on the whole nonsense that I suspect are aligned with yours

The whole thing is ridiculous as the vast majority of people are unaffected so it’s hysteria which I have seen before in the 80s

it would surely be more sensible to have a policy to encourage society to behave like normal but protect the vulnerable with information. Most vulnerable people are old and some have conditions so advise them to isolate if they wish - 99% of the whole population won’t be impacted and most that will are the older generation who don’t work. So get public information films around this. Have supermarkets open to vulnerable groups only at certain. Times. Have Pubs and cafes with set areas for these people,

protect the tiny minority at risk and not punish the massive majority
Click to expand...
Don't think that's particularly controversial tbh. Needs testing and tracing to be up to standard and unfortunately we're not exactly 'world leading' at either.
 
Reactions: Ian1779

covmark

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,767
skybluetony176 said:
I think ADM has it right (surprised me too ) in that pubs, clubs, gyms etc should be closed first. Schools should be the last resort.
Click to expand...
I've been regularly going to the gym, have you? I'd say it's the most sanitised and well run place I've been to since the pandemic hit. Bookings only, 45 minute sessions that start on the hour. With a 15 minute clean by staff in between sessions. Socially distanced machines and weights.
Why should they close?
Agree on Pubs, after a few beers no one gives a shit.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,768
covmark said:
I've been regularly going to the gym, have you? I'd say it's the most sanitised and well run place I've been to since the pandemic hit. Bookings only, 45 minute sessions that start on the hour. With a 15 minute clean by staff in between sessions. Socially distanced machines and weights.
Why should they close?
Agree on Pubs, after a few beers no one gives a shit.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Spot on, the gym I go to is way, way more controlled, sanitised, cleaned than anywhere else I go to.

it stands to reason- nobody is going to go to a gym unless they value it as a resource, so it’s in nobody’s interests to act stupid, so everyone is impeccably behaved.

On top of that, on 2 occasions now I’ve seen people trying to do a hard work out with a face mask on, which is great comic relief when everything else seems to be turning to shit.

don’t underestimate the importance of gyms compared to your nail bars etc
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,769
Ring Of Steel said:
Spot on, the gym I go to is way, way more controlled, sanitised, cleaned than anywhere else I go to.

it stands to reason- nobody is going to go to a gym unless they value it as a resource, so it’s in nobody’s interests to act stupid, so everyone is impeccably behaved.

On top of that, on 2 occasions now I’ve seen people trying to do a hard work out with a face mask on, which is great comic relief when everything else seems to be turning to shit.

don’t underestimate the importance of gyms compared to your nail bars etc
Click to expand...

Yeah didn't mention in my post the mental and physical benefits of the gyms being open. It's a good point.

A couple of people wear masks at the gym I go to. I think to myself I'd probably keel over if I wore one, its hard enough as it is haha.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Ring Of Steel
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,770
CCFCSteve said:
It sounds like (and I’m guessing and taking some bits from what I’ve read/heard), that next it will be pubs closing earlier/curfews.

The highest risk of contagion still appears household related, when other areas start catching up they’ll have to start closing them.

I’ve said before though, my personal view (for what it’s worth) is it makes sense to keep it location/regional based for time being. There is no point enforcing measures on remote areas when they are pretty much unaffected by Covid.
Click to expand...
They must be catching it somewhere out and about to take it home first?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,771
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Curfew at 11.00pm please unless , of course , you are going to work.
Close all pubs at 10pm.
Get the coppers out and fine
anyone flouting the law £500 on the spot.

That's just for starters .
Click to expand...
What's the evidence base for this?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,772
Where is the evidence of where transmission seems to be taking place?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,773

I'm a little puzzled as to how London and the South is being kept so low?
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,774
Grendel said:
I have some views on the whole nonsense that I suspect are aligned with yours

The whole thing is ridiculous as the vast majority of people are unaffected so it’s hysteria which I have seen before in the 80s

it would surely be more sensible to have a policy to encourage society to behave like normal but protect the vulnerable with information. Most vulnerable people are old and some have conditions so advise them to isolate if they wish - 99% of the whole population won’t be impacted and most that will are the older generation who don’t work. So get public information films around this. Have supermarkets open to vulnerable groups only at certain. Times. Have Pubs and cafes with set areas for these people,

protect the tiny minority at risk and not punish the massive majority
Click to expand...

This isn’t a bad idea but there need to be some clear guidelines and assurances.

For example, I have a child that was classified as ‘vulnerable’. If the decision is made that she has to be protected by not being at school, what support or protection do I or the missus get to ensure we are not penalised by our employers for not being able to attend work as we have to care for her. Does her sibling have to also be out of school to protect her?

As with anything, a clear plan, strategy and people with the capability to execute it would do wonders in implementing an idea such as yours.
 
Reactions: chiefdave

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,775
Evo1883 said:
View attachment 16936
I'm a little puzzled as to how London and the South is being kept so low?
Click to expand...

Got to be lack of available tests.
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,776
Evo1883 said:
View attachment 16936
I'm a little puzzled as to how London and the South is being kept so low?
Click to expand...
Because we're all extremely anti social down here.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,777
Ian1779 said:
This isn’t a bad idea but there need to be some clear guidelines and assurances.

For example, I have a child that was classified as ‘vulnerable’. If the decision is made that she has to be protected by not being at school, what support or protection do I or the missus get to ensure we are not penalised by our employers for not being able to attend work as we have to care for her. Does her sibling have to also be out of school to protect her?

As with anything, a clear plan, strategy and people with the capability to execute it would do wonders in implementing an idea such as yours.
Click to expand...
I don't have the answer, but I also think we have to be wary of treating a sector of society as 'different' and somehow 'inferior' too. In terms of affect on their mental health, it'd better if we're all in it together, than they go and watch others having fun and socialising.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,778
wingy said:
They must be catching it somewhere out and about to take it home first?
Click to expand...

Of course in terms of own households but visitors to people’s homes is still believed to be the highest risk of contagion (makes sense when you think of how much external places are cleaned, sprayed, masks being worn in shops, confined spaces etc). How often do people social distance around other people’s houses, wear masks etc ?!
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,779
fernandopartridge said:
Where is the evidence of where transmission seems to be taking place?
Click to expand...

There’s stuff on the surveillance reports around contract tracing contacts (likely close contact) but it’s not 100%.

Ps I’d imagine though as the spread increases so does the risks in busier/confined external places as you’d be around more people who are likely to have it thereby increasing risk of contact (guess work not supported !)

It’s why they need that track and trace app sorted asap to work alongside the manual tracing....and an errr adequate testing system

Edit - sorry, just to clarify I’m talking about risk of transmission. In terms of where it actually happens for each person I guess it’s going to be extremely difficult to ever be 100% accurate so element of (hopefully well) educated guessing in some cases, especially again as spread increases and thereby risks increase of contagion from various sources (again personal view)
 
Last edited: Sep 16, 2020
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,780
Ian1779 said:
This isn’t a bad idea but there need to be some clear guidelines and assurances.

For example, I have a child that was classified as ‘vulnerable’. If the decision is made that she has to be protected by not being at school, what support or protection do I or the missus get to ensure we are not penalised by our employers for not being able to attend work as we have to care for her. Does her sibling have to also be out of school to protect her?

As with anything, a clear plan, strategy and people with the capability to execute it would do wonders in implementing an idea such as yours.
Click to expand...

I would ensure that you and your wife are allowed to teach remotely, and given the necessary tech to do the job. Depending on the numbers you could be matched up with students kept home for the same reason. Just throwing ideas out mind
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete, shmmeee and Ian1779
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 906
  • 907
  • 908
  • 909
  • 910
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 908 of 1666 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 18 (members: 0, guests: 18)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?