Search results

I try my best to avoid your multitude of petty squabbles on here, but in this instance I can't. At times like this you sound like a twat.

We could sort that out quite quickly.

2 more years at the Ricoh on the same terms is a surely a good deal for CCFC. But, there will be no new ground for 10 years if at all. Where do we go in 2years time? Our esteemed owners really need to get down to some proper long term planning with wasps. Some, any, open and honest...

You are almost certainly correct, but as usual supporters are kept in the dark. I think the immediate most regrettable consequence is that we now have (only) one director and he, in my opinion, has never demonstrated the necessary capability.

Re Northampton: I have been trying to find out when reserved STs not taken up will be released. Hoping to get a couple of extra seats close to my STs. Initial announcement was it would be 10am yesterday. Obviously all the problems referred to above will not have helped and presumably there are...

long since gave up arguing with you but I can say with certainty that you are wrong on this one.

Evidently she got that one right though.

So Tim ("I am not minded") Fisher is buying land for a new stadium without any discussion with the relevant Authority(s)? Is he really? What is not to believe in that CT article?

Forget the Community Partnership Document. SISU could have offered a decent premium above the price paid by Wasps. A Wasps veto would then surely have been much more difficult to justify. Depriving a Charity of money doesn't look good? Yet another SISU error?

Absolutely correct though I would go further. They that sow the wind shall reap the whirlwind. A warning that we must expect to suffer serious consequences as the result of our own bad actions.

It's not the despair, I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand. John Cleese Clockwise.

Can't comment on the quality of the corporate hospitality, but I think that the large number of seats that are set aside for it greatly detract from the atmosphere because many are nearly always not taken. Even when we had a reasonable crowd the West stand was normally quite empty. It always...

"The (FL) Board determined that the Club should pay ACL the sum of £471,192, with the £81,643 reduction being a proportion of the additional costs incurred. This sum should be paid to ACL by 14 August 2014." Just a small thought, why have the FL got the money?

This is a first, I agree with you apart from the last bit about the JR. Why on earth would they have wanted to lose that?

This thread is rather like the ancient debate about how many angels can sit on the head of a needle. ie wasting time debating topics of no practical value, or questions whose answers hold no intellectual consequence. Best to let those who might get us back to the Ricoh just get on with it.

How do you know what the Council will do? Never say never.

I'm sorry but I can't resist. Is there anything you don't know a lot about?

You really are the master of misleading statements. The claim was a perfectly valid one, unfortunately it was not successful.

I presume from the above that you must have had those dodgy lenses in for too long. There is a weight of circumstantial evidence that SISU will probably do all of these things given half a chance.