Search results

Still prefer her Yorkshire Pudds to the wife's :p

If you have Sky it is on 959

You wouldn't know what balance was if it bit you an the arse. Good to see your still up to the same old bollox.

Had to pop back for this one G. How do you come to this wonderful conclusion? Please enlighten

So it would effect 350.000 people if the payments aren't made. Thank you Grendel, you have just agreed with me. Back to my holiday, night, night.

Been away for a week but good to see the same crap is posted by the same people. Way to go in having real debate.

So the tax payer of Coventry are not going to benefit from the sale of 120mil + arena and the surrounding area. Think you may well be talking trip.

Don't believe I was replying to you.

What the fuck has that got to do with my reply to his post? He was the one who said it.

It has quite a lot to do with it. He is proposing that we sell/give (I believe he would want us to give it) a tax payer funded property that is worth million's to a HF. If he has not paid tax to the council, of course it will not affect him one bit. But it does effect all other tax payers. I am...

And why is it always ACL/CCC who have to back down? Answer me that without the owner slant. And in reply to a earlier post from you on this thread, WHO was it who ripped the heart out of the city. The bastards who took us to NT, that's who.

Well if I could be there Sunday, i would be more happy supporting the geriatric team playing in sky blue colours at the Ricoh than travel 34mls to watch our league team play at "Home".

But by the sounds of it the Ricoh will be fairly packed on Sunday. Anyone who sees that will know there is a good sized fan base waiting for the club to come back to it true roots. where as having just a few hundred at Sixfields tells our owners they a fecked up big time.

I fully agree with your opening post. But I am afraid City fans will never be in complete agreement about what is best for the club. Some believe going to Sixfields is supporting the team (unless your true sky blue, who openly states he is supporting our "wonderful owners") but are also...

You could well be right, but if you are that is even more worrying. Because if he carn't get a longer term contract it would suggest the the "he is shite" crowd are right.

Fully agree with this. As I said on another thread, while we are paying them use them. It is also the best way of moving them on. If there not in the shop window who is going to buy them?

It carn't have or we wouldn't have to use special conditions, as far as I know anyway.

That also suggests to me he isn't one to show much commitment to clubs he played for, or he is a right pain to manage and is got rid off as quick as he arrives. Or as some have said on here in different ways,he's shite.

And unless we get the defenders we need, it will always be in the opo's favour.

free the sixfield 300. Let them go timmy