Search results

It was never going to happen anyway.

I think if you look at that list of reasons that an application can be refused on there isn't many things on there that BPA isn't going to have issues with. Even if CCC backed it 100% it seems highly unlikely it will be successful. Based on the obvious I don't understand why people are arguing...

Glad we've offered Fleck something. I'm keeping my fingers crossed but not holding my breath. Bigi isn't worth a fee. It's as simple as that. If we could get him on a free with wages that are sensible for league one fair enough. Anything else forget it.

Timothy Spall as Timothy Fisher Ricky Gervais in full David Brent as Steve Waggott The late Ann Kirk would have been a great Ann Lucas

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it Wasps FC who have 150 years of history and they still exist in London today? Wasps RFC was a breakaway when the game turned professional in the 90's isn't it?

I assume that a kicking barn is what it says and is a tall building at least half the footprint of a full size pitch. If that's right it's something completely different. Meaning that the indoor pitch is still unique.

I think SS stood for swallow sidecars IIRC. You're definitely right about it being from Blackpool though.

That's all we have from all sides involved so it's never going to be anything else.

Someone might hold CCFC's owners and custodians responsible for their actions and not get jumped on for doing so as if they've done something wrong?

Curiosity has the better of me. What would SISU have to disclose in a judicial review of a transaction that didn't involve them?

It's not petty it's a fact. We are only ever going to learn what went on behind the scenes about one party. We're never going to know ALL the truths regardless of how many courts it goes to because only one party is on trial, so to speak.

The only thing that we need at the AEHC that we can't get anywhere else as I understand it going from what others have posted is the indoor pitch, everything else we need is available elsewhere and apparently splitting facilities is allowed. It's the primacy that's crucial not location. The...

That's true. We haven't seen anything of what SISU were planning behind the scenes. Internal memo's, minutes from meetings, that sort of thing. SISU's motivation behind all their decision's will never come out. Good point NW.

Just to add. Has no body actually thought that the only thing we should be fighting for is the primacy use of the indoor pitch and the indoor pitch itself as apposed to the swimming pool. Seems to me that the shouty against anything wasps lot on here are being duped into fighting a battle that...

We need a working relationship with Wasps. It's as simple as that. An extended stay at the Ricoh is a good starting point. The academy if you read what people on here who have actually looked into the requirements for Cat 2 status is not actually under threat from Wasps proposal at the AEHC...

We've had the truth twice then already.

We still have no idea what they are though do we Dave and again we go back to the subterfuge. CA apparently says that they agreed on none of them, wasps are saying they agreed some of them and were even specific on one of those points. They also said that they didn't get through all of them so...

Not naive at all. How are we supposed to back the 17 points when we have no idea at all what they are? We have no idea if they reasonable or achievable. How do you know it's not the old trick of asking for what is never going to be available so you can play the victim? If SISU are using...

No. They don't run the SCG do they. Who chairs it? Who used that position to personally start attacking the trust? That was pretty clear in my OP which probably explains why you twisted it. Or tried to anyway.

So?