Search results

Not really, no. They're not in control of it so what happens there isn't a conflict of interest anymore I would think. With regards to maximising there return didn't this come up before and OSB I think it was pointed out that the charities commission states that they only have to get best value...

T The Higgs charity don't run the AEHC anymore. I can't see any changes at the site after the date that they handed the keys over being of any interest to the commission what so ever.

The two are intrinsically linked. What one does effects the other. Especially what SISU does.

And the relevance of that to the charities commission would be? Surely it would have to be proved that they deliberately purchased the investment with the intension of selling at a loss therefore robing the charity before the charities commission would show an interest? Is there any suggestion...

You may be right Nick, a lot of water has gone under the bridge but doing the same things expecting different results is madness and coming straight on a few things may be SISU's best chance. Unfortuantly SISU and CCFC are entwined, it's not always easy to seperate the two and constant BS...

They're already giving everyone else an easy time. No one trusts or believe anything SISU have to say including and most importantly the one group of people who could actually give them some backing if the truth was out, CCFC fans. The web that is now harming SISU has been spun by SISU.

To be blunt Nick it doesn't matter what others do. If SISU want the fans to unite and back them they are going to have to start playing with a straight bat. It simply isn't going to happen any other way. Divide and conquer they say. Why is SISU contributing to the divide with constant BS? Ifthey...

The only thing for sure Nick is we can't unite behind BS. As we're seeing first hand on this very forum. Like you say it's cards on the table time. I would add it's cards on the table time or do one. Personally unless SISU start playing with a straight bat I'd be quite happy to start chanting...

...for me they are going to have to do one of two things for a start. Either come clean and confirm that it is third party litigation and that they are on a ship they are not the captain of and therefore can't stop it OR drop the litigation. Here's why. If they come clean about the third...

It looks like some kind of strong box/safe. Maybe that's where the smoking gun is being kept and someone has forgoten the combination. All we do know is that it isn't 0133.

Oh good. Something to look forward to then. Every cloud and all that. Surely if the charities commission were going to look at the Higgs sale it would have happened already? Plus if they do look at CCC's involvement what jurisdiction do they have over CCC? None I would have thought so surely if...

The devil we know has run out of ideas, there's no way forward with them now. We need new owners wether we know them or not. It's our only chance of moving forward now. Does that mean that we will move forward? No. But it's a chance and that's more than we currently have.

SISU are an issue. Always have been, always will be. I want them gone for that reason alone and so should any CCFC fan. They're part of the problem not part of the cure. Why wouldn't I see them as anything but an issue? Puzzling thread.

The keenness from all parties for SISU to stop legal action to me looks more and more of the process of out SISUing SISU. I'm becoming more and more convinced about this third party litigation as recent events have happened. It's seems IMO to be all about painting SISU into a corner by asking...

Exactly. The contract was a legally binding document and the vehicle that enabled Higgs to take it to court. They lost on a technicality but without the contract it wouldn't have gone to court in the first place as they'd be no grounds to. You can't take someone to court on a verbal promise...

I don't think a promise can be classed as a legally binding contract. I wouldn't pin my hopes in them finding anything if I was you. They haven't found anything that sticks in court as yet and this seems the flimsiest of all of the flimsy arguments. The nearest they've came to court success is...

People were moaning last season we had no plan B. I can't see us building a squad around Baker and I don't think he'll be in a position to demand wages beyond that of a squad player. Worst case scenario is that he comes of the bench and rescues us a point or two in games. Best case scenario is...

Based on what? Hostile takeovers are (dare I say it) standard business practice. I don't think you can take someone to court because they don't like you and won't deal with you meaning that you have no choice but to sell your business. That's life. It happens every day. People deal with people...

Have they even lodged an appeal yet? What form will that appeal have? Haven't they said that they're considering splitting JR1 up? Part to go to the supreme court, part to go to the European court? Sounds like more shit slinging to me hoping something sticks only now they're slinging in two...

I was replying specifically to the post Dave made about consensus and the JR's. It's not a consensus regarding the ACL a ruling has been made in law and upheld in law. That's not a consensus, that's fact. JR2 hasn't even been accepted as raising any point in law yet. Whatever SISU's argument is...