Transfer Rumour David Brekalo (2 Viewers)

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2013
32,659
36,106
313
Coventry
oooo just got 'Brekalo not dead yet'

I'm assuming it means transfer wise not that he's passed away
Ben Stiller Smiling GIF by 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
 

CCFC88

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2013
2,114
953
113
Leeds play a 4 at the back and Charlie Cresswell can't even get in their team, leave this one for others to have please
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,006
12,604
313
Leeds play a 4 at the back and Charlie Cresswell can't even get in their team, leave this one for others to have please
Wonder if Brekalo went to Leeds we might go back in for Cresswell?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saddlebrains

Governmac

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2012
247
311
163
Maybe we've told Viking they can keep him until their season is over but Leeds want him now?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2011
56,217
56,112
813
Coventry, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
Maybe we've told Viking they can keep him until their season is over but Leeds want him now?

Id be happy with that TBH. Id rather we got the right players in in Jan than spunked our load just because. We won’t win as many games but we’re not in any danger right now.
 

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2020
1,809
1,318
213
I'm hoping that Brekalo might look at Leeds and think I've got Rodon, Cresswell, Struijk and possibly Cooper to contend with at Leeds for 2 positions. Then see at City he has less competition for the middle slot of a back 3

From watching those interviews he did he seemed a pretty grounded and sensible guy so hopefully he sees logic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoofhearted

CCFC88

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2013
2,114
953
113
Id be happy with that TBH. Id rather we got the right players in in Jan than spunked our load just because. We won’t win as many games but we’re not in any danger right now.
And what we have now is just fine at the back to build a base to win games, Brekalo (as with all of the new signings) is being brought in (hopefully) to build a team 2, 3, 4 seasons from now
 
  • Like
Reactions: shmmeee

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2020
1,809
1,318
213
Id be happy with that TBH. Id rather we got the right players in in Jan than spunked our load just because. We won’t win as many games but we’re not in any danger right now.

If that means we can get him or Cashin, I’m okay with that.
If we could buy Cashin and loan him back to Derby till Jan that would be an ideal one we’d wanna sign seeming as Brighton are so heavily linked

Derby are set on whoever buys Cashin loans him back for the season, maybe we could agree on until Jan

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: covcity4life

San Francisco

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2023
620
642
193
Coventry
Yeah very true and obvs that’s still a problem but I feel that after they’ve sold those players then at least they’re only relying on that money generated from players sold rather than also having parachute payments to rely on as a back-up. The way it is currently teams like Leicester, Leeds etc can sell top players and generate say £100 mil income and then on top of that they’ll get another £90 million (according to some sources) over the next 3 years. You compare that with what a club like Rotherham has, it’s just astronomically different.

Completely agree. Rotherham don't even have the money to knock down their old stadium for crying out loud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueSkiesForever

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2014
2,307
1,364
213
If that means we can get him or Cashin, I’m okay with that.
If we could buy Cashin and loan him back to Derby till Jan that would be an ideal one we’d wanna sign seeming as Brighton are so heavily linked

Derby are set on whoever buys Cashin loans him back for the season, maybe we could agree on until Jan

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If this is a 5 year plan from Doug and this guy is the real deal, I don't see the harm in doing the season loan back derby are stipulating and then getting in a loan ourselves to cover the gap, knowing we have a very good player arriving on a permanent transfer in the summer.

Agree Jan would be better however and would give Derby lots of time to plan.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Skybluedownunder

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2012
53,038
34,640
763
Coventry
If this is a 5 year plan from Doug and this guy is the real deal, I don't see the harm in doing the season loan back derby are stimulating and then getting in a loan ourselves to cover the gap, knowing we have a very good player arriving on a permanent transfer in the summer.

Agree Jan would be better however and would give Derby lots of time to plan.
Asking for a season long loan back is taking the piss to be honest, half a season more reasonable. We’d then need to get Cashin to sign a 4-5 year deal for it to be worthwhile
 

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2020
1,809
1,318
213
Cashin is most likely going to Brighton.

But so far they’ve not come to the party. Let’s just give Derby what they want but say you can have him till Jan.

We have to realise that now we are a championship club, when Maddison joined Norwich when they were in the champ they loaned him back to us and then even loaned him to Motherwell before he played for them. I think if we could agree till Jan with them and give them the £3m it’s a fair deal all round.

It’s not like we are desperate for a centre back, we still haven’t even gave Binks a chance yet. We’ve got cover, take the risk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2011
36,108
37,498
313
But so far they’ve not come to the party. Let’s just give Derby what they want but say you can have him till Jan.

We have to realise that now we are a championship club, when Maddison joined Norwich when they were in the champ they loaned him back to us and then even loaned him to Motherwell before he played for them. I think if we could agree till Jan with them and give them the £3m it’s a fair deal all round.

It’s not like we are desperate for a centre back, we still haven’t even gave Binks a chance yet. We’ve got cover, take the risk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why on earth would a club with our resources buy a player first team ready and loan him out

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: stupot07 and mmttww

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2015
8,620
5,773
263
Because that’s what he takes to land the player. It’s only 4 months and secures him away from Brighton who are very keen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If the Brighton interest is real, forget him. That’s IF we are interested.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2010
35,046
17,017
313
But so far they’ve not come to the party. Let’s just give Derby what they want but say you can have him till Jan.

We have to realise that now we are a championship club, when Maddison joined Norwich when they were in the champ they loaned him back to us and then even loaned him to Motherwell before he played for them. I think if we could agree till Jan with them and give them the £3m it’s a fair deal all round.

It’s not like we are desperate for a centre back, we still haven’t even gave Binks a chance yet. We’ve got cover, take the risk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agree except he went Aberdeen not Motherwell I think
 

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
Apr 23, 2013
35,660
28,916
413
Id be happy with that TBH. Id rather we got the right players in in Jan than spunked our load just because. We won’t win as many games but we’re not in any danger right now.
The only difficulty with that is we then become less appealing to players than we are currently.

As it stands we're the team who missed out on promotion on penalties looking to strengthen, rather than the muddling lower midtable side
 

Users who are viewing this thread