Welcome to Sky Blues Talk!

You're currently viewing the forum as a guest. Join thousands of fellow Coventry City fans today!

Register Log in

CCFC 2018/2019 Accounts Thread!

matesx said:
My wishful thinking is that if we get promoted a buyer will come in with an offer Joy cant refuse.
Click to expand...
Or there is one waiting, Joy just has to get City back to the Championship. I can see little on going benefit to SISU from being a mid table Championship side.
 
Astute said:
Fuck me.

Top of the table. Pulling clear. Best time to be a City supporter for many years. I have a great idea. Let's think of a thread that can make people angry and want to have an argument.

Oh well. All a part of being a City supporter.
Click to expand...

The accounts have been published and it’s legitimate to discuss them
 
Nick said:
How long until Keiran Maguire tells everybody that millions has been taken from the club and gets everybody frothing?
Click to expand...

He will say we are £81 m in debt to Sisu
 
fernandopartridge said:
Not really very positive is it? £4m + transfer profit mostly covering losses, not sustainable at all.
Click to expand...

Eh?

How is it 'not very positive' that we have made a profit for the first time in however long? How many other clubs in the football league made a profit last year?

Would it be more positive if we made a loss?
 
We’ve actually made a £2m profit if you ignore the interest on the loans which is more a of paper figure than anything else in the accounts
 
PVA said:
Eh?

How is it 'not very positive' that we have made a profit for the first time in however long? How many other clubs in the football league made a profit last year?

Would it be more positive if we made a loss?
Click to expand...

We havent we’ve made an operating loss which has increased
 
chiefdave said:
How many clubs make a profit before transfers? Not to mention its the clubs stated business model. Of course it would be brilliant if we were minions in profit without selling anyone but that's virtually impossible.
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
speedie87 said:
We’ve actually made a £2m profit if you ignore the interest on the loans which is more a of paper figure than anything else in the accounts
Click to expand...

Page 27 shows a £2m loss operationally which has zero to do with that - match day turnover went down
 
speedie87 said:
yeah add the £4m player sales and you get my £2m profit
Click to expand...

Which is as tenable as wasps making a profit due to the extraordinary share issue item
 
Anotization costs much higher? What’s the debt that’s been written down on an asset?

£0.5m on rent which is a lot higher than the stated Ricoh rent amount
 
Grendel said:
Anotization costs much higher? What’s the debt that’s been written down on an asset?

£0.5m on rent which is a lot higher than the stated Ricoh rent amount
Click to expand...

Did they ever confirm what the terms were at the Ricoh for last year?
 
Grendel said:
Which is as tenable as wasps making a profit due to the extraordinary share issue item
Click to expand...

They are different as it’s not a one off exceptional item. Hence wasps had to account for it as such. Making money from player sales a normal part of the trade of running a football club. As shown from selling 3 players for millions again this season.
 
Grendel said:
It was £500k the year before as well
Click to expand...

Hmm. If it's not the Ricoh, any idea what it could be? I know they obviously have the ticket office, but that will be negligible.
 
speedie87 said:
They are different as it’s not a one off exceptional item. Hence wasps had to account for it as such. Making money from player shares a normal part of the trade of running a football club. As shown from selling 3 players for millions again this season.
Click to expand...

It’s not if you are looking at the true value of the business - the business has lost £2.5m yet makes a laughable statement it’s running at a revenue neutral position - it’s had £1.3 m of loans in the previous 3 years unsecured from the master fund as well
 
speedie87 said:
They are different as it’s not a one off exceptional item. Hence wasps had to account for it as such. Making money from player sales a normal part of the trade of running a football club. As shown from selling 3 players for millions again this season.
Click to expand...

It isn't, we cannot rely on profit from players of £4m +, Maddison in particular is a one off and we're very unlikely to bring that sort of money in again.

This isn't me being negative it's just genuine worry for the club's future. We all love to comment on Wasps' poor financial position, ours is not really much better if not worse and it seems a bit like the egos involved have set the two clubs on to a mutually assured suicide.
 
fernandopartridge said:
It isn't, we cannot rely on profit from players of £4m +, Maddison in particular is a one off and we're very unlikely to bring that sort of money in again.

This isn't me being negative it's just genuine worry for the club's future. We all love to comment on Wasps' poor financial position, ours is not really much better if not worse and it seems a bit like the egos involved have set the two clubs on to a mutually assured suicide.
Click to expand...

A lot of people on here are like that Shuggs guy on there
 
TBF we’ve been saying we can’t sustain player sales since Wilson went and yet here we are.
 
speedie87 said:
They are different as it’s not a one off exceptional item. Hence wasps had to account for it as such. Making money from player shares a normal part of the trade of running a football club. As shown from selling 3 players for millions again this season.
Click to expand...
It's not guaranteed though. This profit is only because Maddison moved on, and that was out of our control. Had he not moved on, would we have had to sell someone below value to plug the gap? Or would we have had to have an inferior squad, and risk starting the cycle we were in before of the swirling plughole?

We've sold players this season, but will have smaller income and (possibly) greater costs. What happens then? At what point do we run out of saleable assets, or we have to sell everybody, fast?
 
Grendel said:
Anotization costs much higher? What’s the debt that’s been written down on an asset?

£0.5m on rent which is a lot higher than the stated Ricoh rent amount
Click to expand...
Higgs rent?
I'm assuming the some of amortization increase is down to the fact we bought players for cash and it's spread over the length of their contracts
 
Grendel said:
It’s not if you are looking at the true value of the business - the business has lost £2.5m yet makes a laughable statement it’s running at a revenue
neutral position - it’s had £1.3 m of loans in the previous 3 years unsecured from the master fund as well
Click to expand...

Yes we’d have made a loss without player sales , but player sales are a main source of trading income for football clubs. You can’t just ignore them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PVA
shmmeee said:
TBF we’ve been saying we can’t sustain player sales since Wilson went and yet here we are.
Click to expand...
And I'm realistic enough to know that player sales are an inevitability. It's to Robins' great credit that despite smaller income streams this season, he's got us doing so well, really.

All it takes is one poor choice of manager, though...
 
The increase in turnover we need to even begin to compete in the Championship is huge, well over 100%, where is that coming from?
 
fernandopartridge said:
The increase in turnover we need to even begin to compete in the Championship is huge, well over 100%, where is that coming from?
Click to expand...
To a degree, does our business model need us to sell one or two players at peak value on promotion, keep a similar squad to now, and just take the hit of relegation?

Would that actually straighten us out a little financially? Or risk starting the downward spiral again?
 
If we could somehow manage to have a fairly competitive season on a similar budget and come down with more money in the bank and a similar squad it would help the 'who blinks first' strategy our owners seem to have.
 
fernandopartridge said:
The increase in turnover we need to even begin to compete in the Championship is huge, well over 100%, where is that coming from?
Click to expand...

Well....its a challenge...but if we all drink enough sky blue army lager then maybe...just maybe
 
Liquid Gold said:
If we could somehow manage to have a fairly competitive season on a similar budget and come down with more money in the bank and a similar squad it would help the 'who blinks first' strategy our owners seem to have.
Click to expand...
To an extent, bouncing a bit like, say, Rotherham might be what we need for a while. Given our recent history however, I'd always be worried to loser culture took over again, just when we've rid ourselves of it seemingly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
    • Like
From the Championship to European football
Replies
27
Views
2K
clint van damme
clint van damme
Flying Fokker
Arsenal Game- Coventry City Coach Travel. Busbus
Replies
0
Views
164
Flying Fokker
Flying Fokker
J
    • Like
Your favourite match of the resurrection
2 3 4
Replies
115
Views
5K
wingy
W
Flying Fokker
    • Like
ST Holders Reserved Seat Purchases. Step-by-Step guide.
Replies
0
Views
214
Flying Fokker
Flying Fokker
S
    • Poo
Who is responsible for Recruitment
3 4 5
Replies
140
Views
2K
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom