US Open (1 Viewer)

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
if I moved to Japan when I was 2 I doubt I'd be considered Japanese.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Well, yes you would if you wanted to be. Scratch that, just read number 3.

1.Continued residence in Japan
The applicant must have lived in Japan for more than 5 years.

2.Must be over 20 years old

3.Be of good moral character

4.Financial stability
You or your spouse must be financially independent.

5.Agree to hold only Japanese citizenship
You would lose your own nationality once you gain Japanese citizenship.

6.Respect the Japanese Constitution
Not involved in political violence against Japanese government.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Well, yes you would if you wanted to be. Scratch that, just read number 3.

1.Continued residence in Japan
The applicant must have lived in Japan for more than 5 years.

2.Must be over 20 years old

3.Be of good moral character

4.Financial stability
You or your spouse must be financially independent.

5.Agree to hold only Japanese citizenship
You would lose your own nationality once you gain Japanese citizenship.

6.Respect the Japanese Constitution
Not involved in political violence against Japanese government.
So I lose my nationality, I cease being English and become Japanese because a passport says so?

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Why are you removing the choice from this scenario?
Well that's my point you don't choose your nationality do you. You are what you are. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Brilliant tennis - but really stressful watching it (both girls are equally matched)
 

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
Because both his parents are Norwegian. Thanks for proving my point.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Born in England, lived here for 3 years.

Your point doesn't change fact. There is choice involved. Haaland could have played for England if he chose to. Radacanu is well within her rights to represent Britain. End of story.
 
Last edited:

lifeskyblue

Well-Known Member
I thought women’s tennis was boring…but this is something special. If this the future of the women’s game then it is in safe hands with this pair.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
It's a sweeping generalisation but I'll go with it. No point arguing about two different things. Peace .
I've deleted my last post because there's no point arguing, it's silly. She is indeed well within her rights to represent Britain though and good on her.
Peace to you too.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
I thought women’s tennis was boring…but this is something special. If this the future of the women’s game then it is in safe hands with this pair.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree, I usually only follow the mens game but this final is excellent quality.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Serve went up a notch there.
I thought the pundits were saying she shouldn't serve out there but it worked.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
She's overpowering Fernandez now. Too good for her.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top