MR is ruthless so he may surprise us but LB, striker and tricky wingers for sure. Anyone who watches championship football, there's players like eze from qpr who run rings round teams. We have no one who can do that and whilst our style is different, I think we do need that X factor player.
Dare I say it, a Bright type player
We won't be breaking down Norwich, villa, Fulham etc with westbrooke and Shipley in midfield, absolutely no disrespect to them.Never sure why people keep on saying we need tricky wingers when we don't play with them. If we're playing wingbacks and for some reason we want to switch to a full-back/winger formation one of the wingbacks can push up into the winger position with the other playing the full back. Added advantage then can swap to confuse opposition markers.
Right now (unless MR plans a massive change in formation) wingers are the least of our concerns.
We won't be breaking down Norwich, villa, Fulham etc with westbrooke and Shipley in midfield, absolutely no disrespect to them.
Surely we need a pacey as fuck, can beat a man left or right player to give us an extra dimension, formation change or not
Jodi Jones?
Hope so. Really doJodi Jones?
We won't be breaking down Norwich, villa, Fulham etc with westbrooke and Shipley in midfield, absolutely no disrespect to them.
Surely we need a pacey as fuck, can beat a man left or right player to give us an extra dimension, formation change or not
Said it before, and have nothing against Jodi but he was much better in L2 than L1, understandably, and perhaps L1 was too soon for him, but he has still to prove himself at higher level than L2.
I think he will but he'll need time and patence
As much as I like the lad, McNulty only started scoring when JJ was injured. As good as he is, his decision making is poor. We are a better team without him. I would get ridJodi Jones?
Agree don't care what their position is but we need a couple that can drag us through a game.But why do we need wingers for that? We can get an ACM that could do the same.
We won't be breaking down Norwich, villa, Fulham etc with westbrooke and Shipley in midfield, absolutely no disrespect to them.
Surely we need a pacey as fuck, can beat a man left or right player to give us an extra dimension, formation change or not
Assuming Jones is fit for the start of the season, whenever that is, and we're in the Championship would probably be worth sending him out on loan to get game time.In L1 he was still very tentative about the injury and not at his full confident best. Chances are he'll be a bit the same in Championship at least for a while but an option of the bench as he builds it back up and we can see where his is. Might not be up to the standard but worth giving him a chance to find out. Could save us (and indeed make us) at lot of money if he is.
Really weird reply to what I thought was a realistic request. A pacey player who can beat a man in the championship.I think we need someone who is really really really really fast - faster than any player has ever been before; can dribble past anyone; two-footed; can shoot and score from anywhere on the pitch and also tackles so nobody can ever beat him. Ideally he'd also be brilliant at headers and can score them from the half-way line.
MR should take a look at Roy, IMO. He's presently with Rovers but we may be able to tempt him.
No good beating everyone if you dont know what to do with it once you are through.Really weird reply to what I thought was a realistic request. A pacey player who can beat a man in the championship.
Doubt itAlso...do we not all think that the lad Giles from Wolves will be our starting LWB next season? I'd put my house on MR bringing him back on loan next season and taking McCallum's spot.
How do you know that ?Doubt it
It didn't work out at all for him here
The other players didn't rate him and the lad himself couldn't work out why he'd been brought in and then hardly featured
How do you know that ?
Why was he then I wonder?Doubt it
It didn't work out at all for him here
The other players didn't rate him and the lad himself couldn't work out why he'd been brought in and then hardly featured
Why was he then I wonder?
The whole move was bizarre. I think if the season progressed he would have been given more time but if better days says the players didn't rate him, very odd indeed. Unless it was a bold move to give Mason a kick up the arse to compete knowing MR is looking elsewhere but that's a wild theory!So strange for Wolves to let him come here without being assured he will get minutes. Why not just leave him at Shrewsbury?
and I seen the other day we paid a fee for his loan too, outbidding shrewsbury in the processThe whole move was bizarre. I think if the season progressed he would have been given more time but if better days says the players didn't rate him, very odd indeed. Unless it was a bold move to give Mason a kick up the arse to compete knowing MR is looking elsewhere but that's a wild theory!
Some signings work and some don’t. It’s just how it is. He looked pacey and crossed well.The whole move was bizarre. I think if the season progressed he would have been given more time but if better days says the players didn't rate him, very odd indeed. Unless it was a bold move to give Mason a kick up the arse to compete knowing MR is looking elsewhere but that's a wild theory!
He's nailing it.
Dale is still going
I think we need someone who is really really really really fast - faster than any player has ever been before; can dribble past anyone; two-footed; can shoot and score from anywhere on the pitch and also tackles so nobody can ever beat him. Ideally he'd also be brilliant at headers and can score them from the half-way line.
MR should take a look at Roy, IMO. He's presently with Rovers but we may be able to tempt him.
We have that lad we signed from Chelsea, he hasn't had much opportunity, I would like to see him getting a run of mins under his belt
Who says, he had been injured for a while upto the lay off.Wakefield? He’s going to be released
Who says, he had been injured for a while upto the lay off.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?