Clearly she was very angry . I do feel sorry for her now I've seen what happened even though I usually can't stand her. .i thought the same and think she acted with great dignity
These days you are not allowed an opinion but everyone is allowed an opinion about you.Just saw this, I don't understand the fuss? Is it because she gave an impartial opinion?
The BBC are fuckwits.
Has anyone noticed that their news website is becoming more click bait orientated by the day?
I'm not a big fan of Naga Munchetty, but having seen the footage of what actually led to the investigation over her apparent impartiality regarding Donald Trump's remarks, I cant help but think that Dan Walker really didn't need to drop her in it by asking her directly what she thought. Unprofessional on his part. She's not a guest. He was an idiot.
That's not the whole clip , though you can see she's cross, quite understandably. The next bit is important.This is what all the fuss is about.
And now its turned out that was a lie and the original complaint was about both of them.The worst thing I saw was apparently they didn’t sanction Dan Walker because “no one complained”.
And now its turned out that was a lie and the original complaint was about both of them.
BBC racism row: Naga Munchetty complaint was also about co-host Dan Walker
What censure/rebuke have they given to Walker?
What did they do to her? I thought it was just the complaint had been upheld.
It's more the fact that they specifically mentioned her when they said they'd upheld the complaint, but not Walker.
It’s a good thing the correct decision has been made
What a shit show
It's not just me that's noticed this then, It can't be long before they start using the old "learn this amazing trick/secret the professionals don't want you to know' routine.The BBC are fuckwits.
Has anyone noticed that their news website is becoming more click bait orientated by the day?
Considering they have all VAR they can possibly need...why wait for someone to complain? Surely amongst their millions they employ producers who have to supposedly comply with their own broadcasting standards let alone the industry ones? Self-reporting/investigation in such instances is surely part of their own accountability & responsibility???The worst thing I saw was apparently they didn’t sanction Dan Walker because “no one complained”. Once you’re looking into the segment you either punish anyone or no one it doesn’t matter how it started.
Well, imo he should be sanctioned for putting her on the spot, & she was rightly sanctioned for giving such an answer. She could have simply deflected it & said...'I'm not here to give my personal opinions on any matter...let's move on' or something to that effect.Just seen the full clip. Cannot she has been sanctioned for that. Utterly ridiculous that the BBC can take exception to that, what else was she supposed to say?
It's probably one of those times when if she had bitten her tongue and politely said 'no comment' she would have regretted it all her life. She confronted it and addressed it in, what I would call, a polite and firm, measured response. Kept her dignity. Remarkable times for sure.
Absolutely spot on. They could have had that conversation off camera. Seemed like nothing but self indulgence and lack of professionalism.Well, imo he should be sanctioned for putting her on the spot, & she was rightly sanctioned for giving such an answer. She could have simply deflected it & said...'I'm not here to give my personal opinions on any matter...let's move on' or something to that effect.
Surely they are both trained to not do what either of them did? They are supposedly trained professionals & have instruction on how to handle such things don't they? It's a knowledge, skills & attitude thing & on this issue she let her attitude get the better of her & he was deliberately provocative perhaps based on some off camera discussion on the matter.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?