Otis
Well-Known Member
A hero for that one occasion.
heroic
/hɪˈrəʊɪk/
adjective
- 1.
having the characteristics of a hero or heroine
A hero for that one occasion.Changed alot from hes a hero
I am glad you listened to me and changed your viewpoint
You make no sense otis
I hwve never said the act wasnt heroic. I saod he is not a hero
A coordinator of the event that Khan was attending, i Wonder if the heroic/murderer was at the same event. It would appear the guy with the Narwhal tusk was in the same building and maybe extinguisher guy also. Watching the footage you can't question the bravery shown.First victim named.
BBC News - London Bridge attack victim named as Jack Merritt
London Bridge attack victim named
RIP
Why only focus on the last decade? Surely it’d be better to look at those since the abolishment of the death penalty.How many miscarriages of Justice have their been in the last decade which would have meant the death penalty
Haven't they said that he was indeed at the event?A coordinator of the event that Khan was attending, i Wonder if the heroic/murderer was at the same event. It would appear the guy with the Narwhal tusk was in the same building and maybe extinguisher guy also. Watching the footage you can't question the bravery shown.
Changed alot from hes a hero
I am glad you listened to me and changed your viewpoint
Have they, i hadn't seen it.Haven't they said that he was indeed at the event?
I thought they had. I may be wrong.Have they, i hadn't seen it.
No it’s a really good moral maze where we all have opinions based on evidence and experience and none of us are completely correct or completely wrongWish I'd have kept my gob shut for once :shifty:
Yup, it's such a minefield and not black and white at all.No it’s a really good moral maze where we all have opinions based on evidence and experience and none of us a completely correct or completely wrong
Well yes.No it’s a really good moral maze where we all have opinions based on evidence and experience and none of us a completely correct or completely wrong
It's 50 shades of grey.Yup, it's such a minefield and not black and white at all.
No it’s a really good moral maze where we all have opinions based on evidence and experience and none of us a completely correct or completely wrong
But the police shot him dead.It’s hardly a moral maze. One mad lunatic is allowed out of prison and is allowed to roam freely with students. Another odious individual is allowed at the same event. In an attempt at prison style justice the murderer of a disabled girl kills the lunatic
perhaps we should have a killer room in prisons. So this week it’s Rose, Peter, Ian all together armed with clubs and only one can come out. At least we save £74,000 a year
But the police shot him dead.
So what had he done to deserve to die before? Had he murdered anyone previously?They shot him dead as he was let out. He should have been dead years ago
Just plotted didn't he.So what had he done to deserve to die before? Had he murdered anyone previously?
It’s hardly a moral maze. One mad lunatic is allowed out of prison and is allowed to roam freely with students. Another odious individual is allowed at the same event. In an attempt at prison style justice the murderer of a disabled girl kills the lunatic
perhaps we should have a killer room in prisons. So this week it’s Rose, Peter, Ian all together armed with clubs and only one can come out. At least we save £74,000 a year
Yep.Just plotted didn't he.
My question is was a this a one in a million meeting of two dangerous people meeting that have been released from prison early or are they all over the place.One question that this raises for me is, how often are these clearly dangerous individuals allowed to attend events like this, wouldn't they be better held at secure institutions where those hoping to learn something travel to the event.
Ok so in my scenario u wud call the terrorist a heroA single heroic act makes you a hero for that single act. It's literally written in there!
YepWell yes.
A murderer released early on day release helped stop a terrorist known to be a danger released early from murdering more people.
I know why people have a problem agreeing with each other as I can't even agree with myself.
Not in Grendels black and white existenceThe young lads father has said he does not want his son's death to be used to introduce more draconian sentencing.
Just adds to the complexity of an already complex issue.
I would imagine they happen a lot and nothing like this happensOne question that this raises for me is, how often are these clearly dangerous individuals allowed to attend events like this, wouldn't they be better held at secure institutions where those hoping to learn something travel to the event.
Just reading about what he was involved in what an absolute star!! The world will be poorer from his death but lives have already been changed by his compassion and commitment to helping convicted prisoners to change their lives from their mistakesFirst victim named.
BBC News - London Bridge attack victim named as Jack Merritt
London Bridge attack victim named
RIP
I’m playing catch up on this thread. But it is semantics, has he done a heroic thing or is he a hero?And now you have more info
Do you think a murder of disabled girl is a hero?
Yup. Couldn't agree more. No idea why we are trying to score brownie points over a word.I’m playing catch up on this thread. But it is semantics, has he done a heroic thing or is he a hero?
Can someone who has served 15 years in jail be rehabilitated? Or no matter what he murdered a girl that girl who had special needs?
If rehabilitation doesn’t work, or we as a society don’t believe it, then why do we do it?
I feel that some of this conversation is detracting that 2 people went to work on a Friday and they have been brutally murdered and will never go home.
Yep fair comment especially as one of them died giving others a fresh startI’m playing catch up on this thread. But it is semantics, has he done a heroic thing or is he a hero?
Can someone who has served 15 years in jail be rehabilitated? Or no matter what he murdered a girl that girl who had special needs?
If rehabilitation doesn’t work, or we as a society don’t believe it, then why do we do it?
I feel that some of this conversation is detracting that 2 people went to work on a Friday and they have been brutally murdered and will never go home.
Not really. Why should we spend money on them?
I wish Patel would announce that once we are out of the Eu then we bring back the death penalty for these people
Why would you want to spend any tax payers money on human toilet like Khan?
This guy was convicted for plotting terror attacks.You asked for evidence that people had been wrongly executed. It was provided then you asked for evidence of miscarriages of justice for terrorism. It was provided again. Thoughts?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?