I don't much fancy trawling through 200+ posts (Did you really check?! Cute) of drivel, but I'm still not sure as to why the Telegraph is to blame for that. Are they obliged to make their stories as dull as possible?
I don't much fancy trawling through 200+ posts (Did you really check?! Cute) of drivel, but I'm still not sure as to why the Telegraph is to blame for that. Are they obliged to make their stories as dull as possible?
The point is - there was no story - just anti ccFC journalism aimed at lowering morale and destabilisation.
It takes 1 second to check the number of posts by the way
In some peoples eyes, the Telegraph and CCC are to blame for everything.
No story? Really? Strange that it got such a big reaction then. By the way, I can't even see the original thread on the first page of this forum, so fair play for having it on speed dial - hope you'll continue to keep tabs on the number of replies for us.
Out of interest, what do you think the newspaper's motivation is in trying to lower fan morale and destabilise the club? You seem to know a lot about journalism - is that part of a long term business plan on the CT's part? Or is it a sub-clause somewhere in Trinity Mirror's charter?
I challenge you to name a poster who believes that. Plenty think that ccc are innocent in all of this though.
I challenge you to name a poster who believes that. Plenty think that ccc are innocent in all of this though.
The point is - there was no story - just anti ccFC journalism aimed at lowering morale and destabilisation.
It takes 1 second to check the number of posts by the way
Seemed plenty to see when the news first broke. Everyone was over it like a rash.@ Nick... It doesn't say "Threatens" it says "Pressley’s lawyers served the club with astatutory notice on March 10, demanding payment within 21 days. They have untilMarch 28 to appeal to a court but if they fail to do that, and don’t cough upthe cash by the end of the month, they could theoretically face a winding-up order."....................."theoretically".....Is not a lie, but a possible outcome. No lie there.... Nothing to see here, move on!
Where SP is concerned, love him or loathe him, the scum owes him contracted money, pay up and f**k off. We all know however what SISU and a contract means, SISU will try and worm their way out of paying anything.Seemed plenty to see when the news first broke. Everyone was over it like a rash.
Where SP is concerned, love him or loathe him, the scum owes him contracted money, pay up and f**k off. We all know however what SISU and a contract means, SISU will try and worm their way out of paying anything.
Seemed plenty to see when the news first broke. Everyone was over it like a rash.
Would you prefer it if we only discussed issues that were pre-approved by you?
Waggot gave an unproven manager a very long term deal with a great pay off then sacked him 4 months later.
Great plan that! If the pay off ruins the club then I blame Grendel for leading the calls to sack Pressely.
@ Nick... It doesn't say "Threatens" it says "Pressley’s lawyers served the club with astatutory notice on March 10, demanding payment within 21 days. They have untilMarch 28 to appeal to a court but if they fail to do that, and don’t cough upthe cash by the end of the month, they could theoretically face a winding-up order."....................."theoretically".....Is not a lie, but a possible outcome. No lie there.... Nothing to see here, move on!
Former boss and club at war over compensation deal as Steven Pressley issues order against Coventry City which threatens to have Sky Blues wound up if they don't pay up
@ Nick.... Instead of attacking my post why don't YOU RE-READ what it actually says as posted by Dazzle Tommy Dazzle!
Why don't you read it on the Telegraph website instead of attacking my posts and then come back to me? I quoted it, as in Copy and Pasted it directly from the article.
Either way, no-one has said that we are being closed down. "Threatened" or "theoretically" is accurate. The whole thread is just an invention to beat the CT with. A typical "no news day" on SBT.
Once again Nick I suggest YOU RE-READ it mate!.......... http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/football-news/pay-up-sky-blues-17-8884466
No, it says the order SP has put forward is threatening to have us wound up.
The article says...SP threatens SISU with "Legal Action" which he is quite within his rights to do so. It means he has threatened to "SUE the kings of suing, SISU"....Ironic don't you think?
The article says...SP threatens SISU with "Legal Action" which he is quite within his rights to do so. It means he has threatened to "SUE the kings of suing, SISU"....Ironic don't you think?
He would prefer it if we all defended SISU like he does.
I'd suggest in truth you actually listen to what Farage said to be fair.
Strangely I've always asked you to back that up with some evidence. Something you've always failed to do.
The only defenders of sisu on here are Ginetta and Schmeee - I've always thought them as useless.
He hasn't sued them though has he - why haven't the CT found out what the latest developments are?
Why the sensationalist language which ended up with a very lengthy thread which as I pointed out at the time was a non story.
Something I was shouted down for.
If it's such a non story why have you started a second thread on the subject? Sounds like a touch of biting off your nose to spite your face to me. You're moaning about the interest by creating interest. Like I said earlier. You're an idiot.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?