chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Has Walton ever said a ref has made a mistake? Absolute waste of time having him on.
Has Walton ever said a ref has made a mistake? Absolute waste of time having him on.You mean Peter Walton the ref who explained the UEFA directive that mean that is now classed as a red card?
Has Walton ever said a ref has made a mistake? Absolute waste of time having him on.
It's not who said it, it's the fact that it is the current directives on the application of the laws of the game. You can argue that they are wrong and need to be changed but in 2021 as per the UEFA directive that was a red card.
It was checked by var
Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
Another bitching match for the site's children.
Can we have a soft play board?
I can see why it was a red he almost killed him fucking horrific , interesting that walton said uefa explained this was a red card incident before this exact matchit's a fucking yellow , waltons a massive blurt View attachment 20505
I don’t understand either of your last 2 posts
Long story short , it wasn't a red card offence
then why did he get a red card
The question is not whether it should be a red card, the answer to that question is no. Zero intent and not serious enough imho.
The question is whether it was a red card with today’s laws in place, the answer to that question is yes.
Mate , why was this a red card ?
Are they always correct..no way he certainly wasn't here
“endangering an opponent”
Intent is not relevant anymore, anything like that is gonna get a straight red these days whether you like it or not.
So to sum up , kicking a ball and not unnaturally swerving your leg away from an opponent is now a red card offence .
Sorry I'm lost .
There has to be some common sense , people on here were saying the tackle earlier was horrific , it definitely wasn't, the only thing horrific was bernadeschis reaction which partly swayed the refs decision ...even though it was more fake than the noises my missus made 15 minutes ago
you don’t seem to be able to understand- they are rules, there is no leeway for referees to apply common sense.
Yeah 100% red for me. I’m sure if it was committed on a Cov player most would say the same.The picture shows not where his impact started. It was higher up his leg. Could easily have had a broken ankle. Red for me
Which raises two issues. Firstly, why, in an era of VAR, have other similar tackles in this tournament not resulted in red cards.The question is not whether it should be a red card, the answer to that question is no. Zero intent and not serious enough imho.
The question is whether it was a red card with today’s laws in place, the answer to that question is yes.
Surely you can tell the difference between stepping on a toe when trying to get across the player and going over the top of the ball studs up and going straight into the ankle at full speed.
Which raises two issues. Firstly, why, in an era of VAR, have other similar tackles in this tournament not resulted in red cards.
Secondly, if we continue down this path its basically going to become a non-contact sports. Super slow-mo to see if there's a the slightest bit of contact for a penalty. Sending off any player who mistimes a tackles and makes contact with another player.
If we're going that way not sure it will maintain my interest.
Surely you can tell the difference between stepping on a toe when trying to get across the player and going over the top of the ball studs up and going straight into the ankle at full speed.
Is that over the ball, unless I'm missing a frame as I can't slow it down anymore View attachment 20508
It wasn't over the ball at all. The Italian player was just too quick. Late, yes. Intent or reckless, noIs that over the ball, unless I'm missing a frame as I can't slow it down anymore View attachment 20508
yes but once again you miss the point completely. The ball could be anywhere, it is irrelevant. The rule is ‘endangering an opponent’, and if the ref thinks that’s the case then he is obliged to give a red card.
where it’s a mockery is where the German guy booted the Portugal player full in the face but because it wasn’t deliberate he didn’t get a card at all.
not saying it’s right, but it is what it is.
Nope. Because there is no difference. There was no intent in either yet the contacts were the same. So why two entirely different outcomes?Surely you can tell the difference between stepping on a toe when trying to get across the player and going over the top of the ball studs up and going straight into the ankle at full speed.
I can see why it was a red he almost killed him fucking horrific , interesting that walton said uefa explained this was a red card incident before this exact matchit's a fucking yellow , waltons a massive blurt View attachment 20505
Why show a picture doesn't show where he actually made contact with the player?
Nope. Because there is no difference. There was no intent in either yet the contacts were the same. So why two entirely different outcomes?
But they weren't the same? That's flat out nonsense.
Ampadu hit the player above the ankle. Sterling had his toe stood on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?