I get it, but I'm questioning whether it was a lie or simply an option that some people fell for? The truth is it's not generated the £350m per week so if it did, could it be given to the NHS? It could of course, but until it delivers I guess we'll never know. As I said, he's also not in a position to decide, so I find it strange some would be taken in by it.4%of GDP and the ability to the organise a shopping list, apart from that it was still a lie rob?
When this your campaign bus and you have the same on posters, leaflets, give speeches in front of signs proclaiming the same its not hard to see why some people would get the impression there's £350m a week going to the NHS if we leave.Why does the £350m keep getting raised 10 years later? As I recall it, the sentiment was this is what it COULD fund, not this is what it will fund. If we were £350m a week better off you could do A, B, C or D with it, but one of the options was NHS. He never had the power in gov't to distribute that wealth and I don't know what the true saving (or cost) has been openly shared. The pandemic of course didn't help, but has anyone published any numbers recently? It was largely rubbished from the outset, so if you think that's the reason that leave won, I'd be amazed.
Even looking at that now, it doesn't say that £350m is going to the NHS. It's saying let's fund it instead of sending £350m to the EU each week. Anyone who was taken in by it and thinks that what it's saying on either side is a bit simple.When this your campaign bus and you have the same on posters, leaflets, give speeches in front of signs proclaiming the same its not hard to see why some people would get the impression there's £350m a week going to the NHS if we leave.
View attachment 46694
When this your campaign bus and you have the same on posters, leaflets, give speeches in front of signs proclaiming the same its not hard to see why some people would get the impression there's £350m a week going to the NHS if we leave.
View attachment 46694
It wasn't the reason Leave won, but certainly played a massive role.
“Would we have won without immigration? No. Would we have won without £350m/NHS? All our research and the close result strongly suggests No. Would we have won by spending our time talking about trade and the Single Market? No way.” – Dominic Cummings – Vote Leave Campaign Director
If we wanted to write down lies from the Brexit referendum then we could add another thousand pages to this thread. There were so many bullshit pieces being thrown around from both sides of the argument. We were supposed to have run out of toilet paper several years ago as well.
There you go again with the racist label. One stop shop for every single disagreement. Proper cunts trick. It seems any reason anyone disagrees with the way of thinking from the 'nice side of politics' is racist. This has to stop, it's not helpful and you know what you're doing by trying to shut down debate.So. If you’re claiming that you never believed the lies from leave because you’re smarter than that and then voted for it anyway then why did you vote for it anyway? You’re either not as smart as you think you are or you’re a massive racist. Fact is if there was a genuine argument outside the lies they would have made it. They didn’t. Surely you’d be better off admitting that you were duped.
I can see why elites wanted it, they don’t like the scrutiny on everything from their tax affairs to pollution to workers rights and it’s obvious that the elites own Ferage and the lunatic fringe of the Tories but what was in it for everyone else if it wasn’t funding for NHS, reducing VAT on energy bills etc?
There you go again with the racist label. One stop shop for every single disagreement. Proper cunts trick. It seems any reason anyone disagrees with the way of thinking from the 'nice side of politics' is racist. This has to stop, it's not helpful and you know what you're doing by trying to shut down debate.
I've been over this many times and my reasons for voting leave. I believed we would be better off out. I also felt that being controlled by Brussels was wrong and we were getting more and more EU legislation. On balance we've not got what we were promised for a variety of reasons, but the red bus never came into my thinking and I doubt it did for a lot of others.
I wasn’t labelling anyone in particular a racist but it is a fact that some people did vote leave for the simple reason that they’re racists. There’s no escaping that and it would be moronic to ignore it.There you go again with the racist label. One stop shop for every single disagreement. Proper cunts trick. It seems any reason anyone disagrees with the way of thinking from the 'nice side of politics' is racist. This has to stop, it's not helpful and you know what you're doing by trying to shut down debate.
I've been over this many times and my reasons for voting leave. I believed we would be better off out. I also felt that being controlled by Brussels was wrong and we were getting more and more EU legislation. On balance we've not got what we were promised for a variety of reasons, but the red bus never came into my thinking and I doubt it did for a lot of others.
That’s a complete oxymoron.I mean, regardless of what you think about the result of it, it would never have happened if it wasn't for that kind of sneering. It was a 2% split in the vote, and there were at least 2% of people voting in protest towards those condescending attitudes we still see today.
I mean, who is less intelligent? The people that voted for it, or the people that have had multiple explanations and warnings, and still fail to learn from their mistakes and behave like this.
I am a complete moron .
Nobody is denying racists would've voted for it, what you said was different and that everyone who didn't believe tge lies was a racist. That's not the same thing.I wasn’t labelling anyone in particular a racist but it is a fact that some people did vote leave for the simple reason that they’re racists. There’s no escaping that and it would be moronic to ignore it.
Why did you believe we would be better off? Based on what if not the lies?
Being controlled by Brussels is just bollocks. The little amount of change since leaving even under the government of Brexits biggest cheerleader Boris Johnson shows it to be bollocks. Unless you count things like the freedom to pollute rivers, the freedom to bring back roaming charges and other things that shoot us all in the foot. Brussels was just the centralisation of legislation, the only thing that’s changed is that centralisation has changed location and it’s no longer a shared cost so the cost of that legislation pp is much higher.
Where’s the tangible benefits? What tangible benefits were you expecting?
I’m not sure what being an island nation with our own currency was something we needed to leave the EU for.Nobody is denying racists would've voted for it, what you said was different and that everyone who didn't believe tge lies was a racist. That's not the same thing.
With regards to what I was expecting, I believed rightly or wrongly that being in charge of our own destiny was the right thing to do. We're an island nation with our own currency and I firmly thought it'll was the right thing to do. Others didn't, I get that and have no problem, but I didn't label them anything that was a nasty smearing campaign that actually as Earlsdon said, may even have swung the vote.
Tbh quite a few, but my reasons for voting Brexit 9 years ago are not what we're scrutinising point by point now so you can continue to try and pull them apart and deflect the rubbish you wrote labelling 52% of voters as a combination of racist and stupid. Your argument is at best lazy and flawed, possibly dangerous, but you still refuse to see it.I’m not sure what being an island nation with our own currency was something we needed to leave the EU for.
Baring a massive change in the tectonic plate Europe is sat on or a massive drop in sea levels we’ll always be an island nation, and if either of those things did happen we’d have bigger issues than Brussels. The pound was protected by EU law, we had a veto on ever joining the euro. Somewhat ironically a veto that is now lost so when we rejoin it will be with a formal commitment to join the euro at some point in the future. The best way to maintain our own currency was to remain in the status quo we had.
Any other reasons?
Tbh quite a few, but my reasons for voting Brexit 9 years ago are not what we're scrutinising point by point now so you can continue to try and pull them apart and deflect the rubbish you wrote labelling 52% of voters as a combination of racist and stupid. Your argument is at best lazy and flawed, possibly dangerous, but you still refuse to see it.
I’m not talking about the entire 52%. I’m talking about a percentage of the 52% who claim that they never fell for the lies of the Brexit campaign and voted leave for another reason as they were too smart to fall for lies.Tbh quite a few, but my reasons for voting Brexit 9 years ago are not what we're scrutinising point by point now so you can continue to try and pull them apart and deflect the rubbish you wrote labelling 52% of voters as a combination of racist and stupid. Your argument is at best lazy and flawed, possibly dangerous, but you still refuse to see it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?