Do you want to discuss boring politics? (17 Viewers)

tisza

Well-Known Member
Mandleson never actually had a reputation worth protecting - it’s ironic as this is exactly the kind of reasoning Johnson would project
Poor judgement throughout. Appointing someone with numerous dodgy financial scandals in their past before they've passed vetting - surely Starmer's experience as a lawyer should have had alarm bells ringing in his head when apppointing someone with Mandelson's history. Or maybe they thought someone with a dodgy financial past would fit in nicely with Trump's mindset.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top