Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (132 Viewers)

  • Thread starter BackRoomRummermill
  • Start date Feb 23, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 903
  • 904
  • 905
  • 906
  • 907
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 905 of 1666 Next Last
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,641
They have said around 200k I believe , the new facility is supposed to bring that up 50k .
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,642
wingy said:
They have said around 200k I believe , the new facility is supposed to bring that up 50k .
Click to expand...

Feels about right looking at the daily testing numbers in the past
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,643
CCFCSteve said:
If they’re running at lab capacity (anyone know what this is, I know it says 380k but that can’t be right for the labs ?) then there’s not a lot we can do for the time being. If we’re not, then Hancock and the lady running it need to go as it’s unacceptable. Hancock should just come out and explain clearly the numbers of requests every day, the capacity and what they are doing to increase capacity (think new labs due to go live soon).

People are understandably nervous so are getting tested when they almost certainly won’t have it (as numbers suggest). Unfortunately as BSB alluded to, this is now cold/flu season so it’s going to keep happening with ever larger numbers (which no country, not even a Germany could probably handle)
Click to expand...

Hospitals and other essential services won’t be able to run if staff are all off waiting for tests. Then again the government could easily have foreseen this scenario and they did a half arsed job.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849 and Sky Blue Pete

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,644
Might start kicking off at UHCW now.

Cardiology mate had first confirmed case that was on a ward. Always the potential for that kind of thing to spread like wildfire
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,645
I am fairly sure that NHS labs have got capacity but Hancock and Harding insist on the tests from Pillar 2 to go to a selection of private labs ('the lighthouse laboratories').
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,646
Who runs a pub.
Heard something yesterday,in the news today along with hairdresser's.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,647
fernandopartridge said:
I am fairly sure that NHS labs have got capacity but Hancock and Harding insist on the tests from Pillar 2 to go to a selection of private labs ('the lighthouse laboratories').
Click to expand...
I remember reading an article earlier in the year saying just this. Several trusts coming forward and saying that their labs were already geared or gearing up for mass testing but being shunned for the so called lighthouse labs. Beggars belief if that’s still the case.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,648
I don’t understand what happened to the war effort theme. Nothing has been done it seems to requisition capacity for schools or testing in the months we had to prepare. It was obvious testing was the way out of this, instead of throwing billions at a scheme to help large reateraunt chains which restarted the infection rate we could’ve spent it on hiring in labs, paying offices to host temp schools, all sorts.

It just seems like we’ve tried nothing and all the effort has gone into keeping large businesses running as normal.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849, chiefdave, fernandopartridge and 1 other person

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,649
skybluetony176 said:
I remember reading an article earlier in the year saying just this. Several trusts coming forward and saying that their labs were already geared or gearing up for mass testing but being shunned for the so called lighthouse labs. Beggars belief if that’s still the case.
Click to expand...

Well yeah, there are a selection of NHS hub labs that can perform a very wide range of tests and have capacity. You can only reach the conclusion that it is shock doctrine stuff.
 
Reactions: skybluetony176 and wingy
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,650
Saddlebrains said:
Might start kicking off at UHCW now.

Cardiology mate had first confirmed case that was on a ward. Always the potential for that kind of thing to spread like wildfire
Click to expand...
Glad my Dad ended up in St Cross then
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,651
shmmeee said:
I don’t understand what happened to the war effort theme. Nothing has been done it seems to requisition capacity for schools or testing in the months we had to prepare. It was obvious testing was the way out of this, instead of throwing billions at a scheme to help large reateraunt chains which restarted the infection rate we could’ve spent it on hiring in labs, paying offices to host temp schools, all sorts.

It just seems like we’ve tried nothing and all the effort has gone into keeping large businesses running as normal.
Click to expand...
You should be involved in this type of stuff. Very creative and thoughtful in your planning
 
Reactions: Grendel

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,652
Not sure why people are complaining about tests, Patel was on TV this morning and was very clear, "tests are available" and "its wrong to say tests are not available".
CCFCSteve said:
I know it says 380k but that can’t be right for the labs ?
Click to expand...
I made the same mistake, although the way the data is presented is pretty misleading. The total test capacity number the government are throwing out every day includes antibody tests.

As you can see that number conveniently shot up at the time they were getting grief for being way off the promised testing numbers back in the spring and switched from tests done to testing capacity.

The actual swab testing capacity is 240K. You can see pretty clearly the tests processed (the dark blue line) has been rapidly catching up with the testing capacity (light blue line) yet seemingly nothing put in place for when the two meet. The daily testing numbers for antibody tests processed are fairly static at around 20K.

Brighton Sky Blue said:
Hospitals and other essential services won’t be able to run if staff are all off waiting for tests. Then again the government could easily have foreseen this scenario and they did a half arsed job.
Click to expand...
Peston has suggested part of the issue currently is that 100K tests a day are being reserved for workers in social care.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,653
Spent some time this morning working out just how screwed I'd be if I'm not back in work when furlough ends. Anyone who thinks living on benefits is an easy life might want to try running through the entitledto website and seeing what you'd be expected to live on.

Mine ends up as £409.89 a month. One thing I can't really get my head round is why, if I was renting, I'd get an additional £488.67 a month but as a mortgage payer I get nothing. Well that's not strictly true, after 9 months on benefits I can claim £1.21 a month towards my mortgage!

Reckon I could just about get through to May, assuming the bank are cooperative with a mortgage holiday (they seem to be nothing more than usual steps for people struggling to pay rather than something specific to help with corona) before I'm in serious trouble so would just have to hope things are getting back to normal by then.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,654
skybluetony176 said:
I remember reading an article earlier in the year saying just this. Several trusts coming forward and saying that their labs were already geared or gearing up for mass testing but being shunned for the so called lighthouse labs. Beggars belief if that’s still the case.
Click to expand...

Yeah, this was true Tony. From memory PHE apparently wanted to control everything centrally so were really slow to also involve uni and private labs. As I’ve said before ministers should rightly take flack for under performing departments but PHE were pretty shambolic at the start (PPE, testing etc). For example how do you not have alternative PPE supply chains lined up ie UK based manufacturers (that could immediately be turned on), incase there was a world wild pandemic ?!! (and countries looking after themselves) - this isn’t a funding issue, it’s a common sense issue !

I’m sympathetic due to these being unprecedented times but FFS !!
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,655
chiefdave said:
Not sure why people are complaining about tests, Patel was on TV this morning and was very clear, "tests are available" and "its wrong to say tests are not available".

I made the same mistake, although the way the data is presented is pretty misleading. The total test capacity number the government are throwing out every day includes antibody tests.

As you can see that number conveniently shot up at the time they were getting grief for being way off the promised testing numbers back in the spring and switched from tests done to testing capacity.

The actual swab testing capacity is 240K. You can see pretty clearly the tests processed (the dark blue line) has been rapidly catching up with the testing capacity (light blue line) yet seemingly nothing put in place for when the two meet. The daily testing numbers for antibody tests processed are fairly static at around 20K.
View attachment 16921

Peston has suggested part of the issue currently is that 100K tests a day are being reserved for workers in social care.
Click to expand...

That makes sense Dave. Think someone else mentioned antibody testing (sampling) previously.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,656
CCFCSteve said:
Yeah, this was true Tony. From memory PHE apparently wanted to control everything centrally so were really slow to also involve uni and private labs. As I’ve said before ministers should rightly take flack for under performing departments but PHE were pretty shambolic at the start (PPE, testing etc). For example how do you not have alternative PPE supply chains lined up ie UK based manufacturers (that could immediately be turned on), incase there was a world wild pandemic ?!! (and countries looking after themselves) - this isn’t a funding issue, it’s a common sense issue !

I’m sympathetic due to these being unprecedented times but FFS !!
Click to expand...
Isn't a lot of that, though, government ignoring their own simulation exercise just three years earlier?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,657
Deleted member 5849 said:
Isn't a lot of that, though, government ignoring their own simulation exercise just three years earlier?
Click to expand...
As the old adage goes. Fail to prepare, prepare to fail.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,658
Sky Blue Pete said:
You should be involved in this type of stuff. Very creative and thoughtful in your planning
Click to expand...

I don’t think so. This is basic level obvious stuff surely? It’s not even that we’ve tried something and we’ve failed, it’s more a refusal to even try anything.
 
X

xcraigx

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,659
Ah well, I gave it 3 months but COVID has finished my business off. Just handed my notice in and am feeling strangely contented. The last few weeks in particular have been a nightmare but at least the worry of basically spending money putting off the inevitable is over. The wife works for me, but at least she's got something else (much better) lined up otherwise it could have been so much worse. I had got used to daytime telly during the lockdown so it'll be nice to see a bit more home under the hammer and bargain hunt. They have been missed.
 
Reactions: jimmyhillsfanclub and Sky Blue Pete

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,660
shmmeee said:
FYI for anyone trying to get tested

Click to expand...

Thanks, missus had no joy, I'll tell her to try this this evening.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,661
CCFCSteve said:
Yeah, this was true Tony. From memory PHE apparently wanted to control everything centrally so were really slow to also involve uni and private labs. As I’ve said before ministers should rightly take flack for under performing departments but PHE were pretty shambolic at the start (PPE, testing etc). For example how do you not have alternative PPE supply chains lined up ie UK based manufacturers (that could immediately be turned on), incase there was a world wild pandemic ?!! (and countries looking after themselves) - this isn’t a funding issue, it’s a common sense issue !

I’m sympathetic due to these being unprecedented times but FFS !!
Click to expand...

PHE is not responsible for sourcing PPE. It designs and commissions services and runs some public health laboratories, whose role it is to identify outbreaks not carry out mass testing. PHE had a role in quality assuring tests carried out by other NHS labs. PHE capacity was reached in March.

For an intelligent fella I think you ought to do a bit more reading and stop listening to politicians trying to scapegoat. How can PHE be to blame for not buying something they're not responsible for and not having the capacity to do any more than they have been designed and funded for?
 
Reactions: skybluetony176 and Ring Of Steel
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,662
fernandopartridge said:
PHE is not responsible for sourcing PPE. It designs and commissions services and runs some public health laboratories, whose role it is to identify outbreaks not carry out mass testing. PHE had a role in quality assuring tests carried out by other NHS labs. PHE capacity was reached in March.

For an intelligent fella I think you ought to do a bit more reading and stop listening to politicians trying to scapegoat. How can PHE be to blame for not buying something they're not responsible for and not having the capacity to do any more than they have been designed and funded for?
Click to expand...

I stand corrected about PPE, shouldn’t have lumped it in (I only do it for the back handed ‘intelligent’ comments ). I think the testing set up was originally the responsibility PHE though (appreciate not standard remit but they were overseeing it) then wasn’t it moved after the initial shambles ?

I’ve said previously that ministers should ultimately held accountable (also said Hancock and Williamson shouldnt probably was in jobs) but there are others who have got to take responsibility, whether that be PHE, NHS procurement etc etc, very highly paid senior people who would not have delivered albeit in unprecedented times

Ps think I’d mentioned previously that the infectious diseases team in PHE employs over 2000 people

Edit - See below. As I’ve said this isn’t me defending people like Hancock (who I can barely stand) but people have also got to look at the bigger picture and not just a ministerial scapegoat for everything failing.

Government has centralised the coronavirus response – but there's a role for the local too

COLIN TALBOT: One-size-fits-all solutions imposed from Whitehall are not enough
www.kcl.ac.uk

‘ Another example is the issue of testing for the virus. There are dozens of laboratories across the UK capable of doing this testing – in the public, private and third sectors, including universities.

Instead of utilising this capacity, Public Health England, who are responsible for coordinating testing, decided to centralise everything. Initially, they centred everything on a handful of their own laboratories. This massively limited capacity.

But they had a plan – to build three big testing facilities, from scratch. The first is in Milton Keynes, and the other two are at Alderley Park in Cheshire, and in Glasgow.

(On a personal note, Alderley Park is where I started my working life in 1969. Back then it was an ICI Pharmaceuticals research centre and I worked as a Lab Technician in their toxicology labs.)

Not surprisingly there are long lead-times in setting up such facilities, even where, as at Alderley, there is some existing capacity.

Very belatedly, the strategy switched in late March or early April to include the decentralised university and private labs as it became clear the UK was reaching nowhere near the level of testing necessary.

But by then the UK had lost weeks in ramping up testing to the levels seen in many other countries.’

Guardian article


Coronavirus testing: how some countries got ahead of the rest

‘Prof Eleanor Riley, an infectious disease expert at the University of Edinburgh and former director of the Roslin Institute, said these resources could have been tapped into far earlier and, in some cases, laboratories’ offers were not taken up. “This could’ve happened a month ago,” she said. “PHE has been plugging on in its very blinkered way and meanwhile there’s a revolution going on on the shop floor. It’s like hospitals have decided, ‘We’re just going to go ahead and do it.’”
 
Last edited: Sep 15, 2020

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,663
xcraigx said:
Ah well, I gave it 3 months but COVID has finished my business off. Just handed my notice in and am feeling strangely contented. The last few weeks in particular have been a nightmare but at least the worry of basically spending money putting off the inevitable is over. The wife works for me, but at least she's got something else (much better) lined up otherwise it could have been so much worse. I had got used to daytime telly during the lockdown so it'll be nice to see a bit more home under the hammer and bargain hunt. They have been missed.
Click to expand...

Sorry to hear about your business going down Craig. May well be too late but how about trying to claw something back from the legalized thieves otherwise know as the insurance company. Small firms thrown lifeline in insurance case ruling
 
Reactions: xcraigx, skybluetony176 and Sky Blue Pete

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,664
These people are on a different planet.
Downing Street revealed testing was discussed at a Cabinet meeting chaired by Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Tuesday morning.

Following the cabinet meeting Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Leader of the House of Commons, hailed the testing programme as a "government success".

"I think it's going as well as could possibly be expected considering the demand," he said.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: skybluetony176

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,665
CCFCSteve said:
I stand corrected about PPE, shouldn’t have lumped it in (I only do it for the back handed ‘intelligent’ comments ). I think the testing set up was originally the responsibility PHE though (appreciate not standard remit but they were overseeing it) then wasn’t it moved after the initial shambles ?

I’ve said previously that ministers should ultimately held accountable (also said Hancock and Williamson shouldnt probably was in jobs) but there are others who have got to take responsibility, whether that be PHE, NHS procurement etc etc, very highly paid senior people who would not have delivered albeit in unprecedented times

Ps think I’d mentioned previously that the infectious diseases team in PHE employs over 2000 people
Click to expand...

Agree on accountability but ultimately the buck stops here with Hancock and the Tories generally. They designed the entire NHS landscape including significant reform of the procurement bodies (with the aim of efficiency). They underfunded the entire service for 10 years. This is on them.
 
Reactions: Ian1779 and skybluetony176

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,666
xcraigx said:
Ah well, I gave it 3 months but COVID has finished my business off. Just handed my notice in and am feeling strangely contented. The last few weeks in particular have been a nightmare but at least the worry of basically spending money putting off the inevitable is over. The wife works for me, but at least she's got something else (much better) lined up otherwise it could have been so much worse. I had got used to daytime telly during the lockdown so it'll be nice to see a bit more home under the hammer and bargain hunt. They have been missed.
Click to expand...

Unlucky mate. Least you have it a bash. Better luck with your next venture
 
Reactions: xcraigx

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,667
xcraigx said:
Ah well, I gave it 3 months but COVID has finished my business off. Just handed my notice in and am feeling strangely contented. The last few weeks in particular have been a nightmare but at least the worry of basically spending money putting off the inevitable is over. The wife works for me, but at least she's got something else (much better) lined up otherwise it could have been so much worse. I had got used to daytime telly during the lockdown so it'll be nice to see a bit more home under the hammer and bargain hunt. They have been missed.
Click to expand...
Sorry to hear that mate. Good news that the wife has already sorted something else out. Hopefully that will keep your head above water until things start getting back to normal.
 
Reactions: xcraigx
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,668
Priti Patel says it’s now against the rules for families to stop and chat in the street. Still legal for me to talk to 100 a day
 
Reactions: BodicoteSkyBlue, Ian1779 and Sky Blue Pete

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,669
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Priti Patel says it’s now against the rules for families to stop and chat in the street. Still legal for me to talk to 100 a day
Click to expand...

Apart from when shooting grouse
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,670
fernandopartridge said:
Apart from when shooting grouse
Click to expand...

Or dinghies
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,671
People in hospital up by 26% in a week
People on ventilators up by 50% in a week
Daily hospital admissions in England up by 82% in a week
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 15, 2020
  • #31,672
Sky Blue Pete said:

I was infected with coronavirus in March, six months on I’m still unwell

Charlie Russell, 27, is one of an estimated 600,000 people with post-Covid illness, a condition that may give an insight into chronic fatigue syndrome
www.theguardian.com

Don’t worry though Grendel knows it doesn’t affect anyone under 65
Click to expand...

I have CFS, be interesting to see if they can get an insight into it to give better treatment.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,673
fernandopartridge said:
People in hospital up by 26% in a week
People on ventilators up by 50% in a week
Daily hospital admissions in England up by 82% in a week
Click to expand...
It would be an understatement to say that isn’t good but that isn’t good. Brace yourselves.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,674
fernandopartridge said:
People in hospital up by 26% in a week
People on ventilators up by 50% in a week
Daily hospital admissions in England up by 82% in a week
Click to expand...

Not questioning there are rises but still need some context Fernando. I took a couple of pics from the gov numbers a few days back, for example on 6 Sept

Patients in hospital (covid) 756
Patients on ventilators 69
Patients admitted 124 (although think this had been stuck for a few days).

Yesterday’s uploaded figure
patients in hospital 972 (Sunday)
Patients on ventilators 106 (Monday)

Patients admitted is out of date so not sure where I can find latest number. Where do you get yours as gov site isn’t great.

now obviously any increase is concerning (I’d imagine that these numbers will unfortunately continue to increase for a while yet), however, at its peak I think
Patients in hospital with covid was something like 17,000 (from memory) they think tens of thousands were catching it per day and around 4-5000 were on ventilators. Not to mention deaths.

As I say people are right to be concerned but percentage rises on relatively small numbers can sometimes be misleading and distort people’s views. Hopefully people will heed the new advice and figures won’t start growing exponentially. Fingers crossed anyway
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2020
  • #31,675
CCFCSteve said:
Not questioning there are rises but still need some context Fernando. I took a couple of pics from the gov numbers a few days back, for example on 6 Sept

Patients in hospital (covid) 756
Patients on ventilators 69
Patients admitted 124 (although think this had been stuck for a few days).

Yesterday’s uploaded figure
patients in hospital 972 (Sunday)
Patients on ventilators 106 (Monday)

Patients admitted is out of date so not sure where I can find latest number. Where do you get yours as gov site isn’t great.

now obviously any increase is concerning (I’d imagine that these numbers will unfortunately continue to increase for a while yet), however, at its peak I think
Patients in hospital with covid was something like 17,000 (from memory) they think tens of thousands were catching it per day and around 4-5000 were on ventilators. Not to mention deaths.

As I say people are right to be concerned but percentage rises on relatively small numbers can sometimes be misleading and distort people’s views. Hopefully people will heed the new advice and figures won’t start growing exponentially. Fingers crossed anyway
Click to expand...

Yes I'm sure that people just have things out of context, its not really as much of a problem as people think.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 903
  • 904
  • 905
  • 906
  • 907
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 905 of 1666 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 130 (members: 0, guests: 130)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?