Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Burton Albion (Home) Match Thread (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Jan 13, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
Next
First Prev 14 of 17 Next Last

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #456
CCFC said:
You love posting this one after a poor result or when we're low down the form table.
Click to expand...

Which has been the last 10 games
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #457
ccfc92 said:
Cheers G and Stu.

With the Armstrong news, I forgot the details about Bigi's loan.

Odd that NUFC insisted he stayed here :thinking about:
Click to expand...
pretty sure it's bull, the no recall would have been decided between both clubs and its likely we pushed for it rather than Newcastle insisting on it.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #458
CCFC said:
pretty sure it's bull, the no recall would have been decided between both clubs and its likely we pushed for it rather than Newcastle insisting on it.
Click to expand...

Either way, unless he improves massively, it's a waste of a loan space/wages.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #459
Gazolba said:
They won 3-1 today, we lost 0-2. They are on an upsurge, we are in freefall.
Click to expand...

Of please do just piss off.
 
J

jas365

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #460
lifeskyblue said:
We were poor. Burton had it easy and won at a canter. Not sure how good they are as we made it easy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Right now they're the best team in the division. They've won more games than anyone else (and have games in hand) and have been top nearly all season.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #461
CCFC said:
Newcastle insisted on it did they? Where you hear that one?
Click to expand...

It was a joke.......


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #462
The usual absolute drivel being spoken here. Burton hardly won at a canter. They won as the result of defensive errors. Thought Mowbray got the changes wrong.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #463
CCFC said:
pretty sure it's bull, the no recall would have been decided between both clubs and its likely we pushed for it rather than Newcastle insisting on it.
Click to expand...

Stop being so touchy, it was a joke. And anyway it would be more than Newcastle didn't want a recall clause because they insisted on it for Armstrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #464
fernandopartridge said:
They won as the result of defensive errors.
Click to expand...

Which they knew we would make before the game even started- and they planned for it.
 

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #465
Not sure I understand the RCC, Bigi and Stokes negativity.
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #466
Performances like today against opposition who are up there with us are the reason I apply caution when I think of us needing a play off final........

First half the only ones in the game were Fleck and Vincelot. Second half Fleck lost his way after his booking and was culperable for the second goal.

Can't really say Mowbray got the starting line up wrong as most called for Maddison to start, and I called for Ruben to start too, but on reflection these two shouldn't have started against a rough and tumble type of team. How many tackles did they miss and how many challenges did they back out of?

Ramage looked rusty and I think we need to address having two right footed CB's playing together. Both he and Ricketts looked dodgy when playing on that side being primarily right footed, even if that means Stokes playing at CB where he's looked useful.

Armstrong is being marked out of games and needs help up top. That said the opportunities he created today he did all on his own because of a lack of support.

Phillips appears to be getting worse by the game. Had high hopes for he lad but they've all but vanished right now.

Murphy had a poor second game in quick succession which is a shame as he normally comes back fighting after a poor game but didn't happen today.

Surprised to hear the stats were 14 shots and 7 on target but guessing they count the back pass like shots we had as shots which would increase the what seemed like a poor stat.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #467
3 shots on target for them - 2 goals. 7 shots on target for us - keeper only had to make one good save from Maddison.
 

mechaishida

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #468
Great_Expectations said:
Not sure I understand the RCC, Bigi and Stokes negativity.
Click to expand...

I can understand the Bigi negativity; he seems to just lose possession and slow the pace down. Seems pointless having him if he's not contributing positively.

Can't see how anyone can knock Stokes, tbh. Mr Reliable, 99.99% of the time.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #469
Great_Expectations said:
Not sure I understand the RCC, Bigi and Stokes negativity.
Click to expand...
I dont for Stokes and RCC today, Bigi was dire.

Slowed the game down.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #470
Nick said:
I thought ramage was decent today
Click to expand...

I'd go with that. He was the one positive for me.
 
M

Macca

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #471
fernandopartridge said:
The usual absolute drivel being spoken here. Burton hardly won at a canter. They won as the result of defensive errors. Thought Mowbray got the changes wrong.
Click to expand...

As we did against Crewe, they all count
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #472
Bigi plays like a CB, no point being a midfielder if you can't impact a game positively
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #473
Aaron Phillips you stupid dumb c**t
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #474
Stokes was poor but he had zero support as we had no one playing on the left flank second half.
Cook did ok and don't think bigi did as badly as people make out.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #475
Bigi was better than Fleck today
 

idm1975

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #476
So we are all assuming we know what bigi's instructions where from tm?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #477
CCFC said:
Stokes was poor but he had zero support as we had no one playing on the left flank second half.
Click to expand...

Bang on that. Especially second half.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #478
skybluetony176 said:
I'd go with that. He was the one positive for me.
Click to expand...
I thought he was awful on the ball and part of the myriad players culpable for the 2nd goal.
 

Johnnythespider

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #479
If both centre backs are right footed surely Haynes should have started with Stokes and Ramage at centre back and Ricketts at right back.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #480
fernandopartridge said:
I thought he was awful on the ball and part of the myriad players culpable for the 2nd goal.
Click to expand...

I couldn't believe how bad he was on the ball given the amount of games he's played on the PL.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #481
stupot07 said:
I couldn't believe how bad he was on the ball given the amount of games he's played on the PL.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Click to expand...
Aye. He made Paul Williams look like Franco Baresi.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #482
Ramage did fine. Ricketts was poor on ball today. Just kept dilly dallying
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #483
I.thought ramage was no nonsense, not going to put defence splitting passes together.

Rickets got caught on the ball, there was the the one he got closed down from messing about
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #484
Burton free kicks and corners were good too. Should have scored from the corner to the edge of the box and hit the bar from a quick free kick with all of our players at sea. Our set pieces are poor in comparsion, just keep going short from corners without any plan.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #485
CCFC said:
Stokes was poor but he had zero support as we had no one playing on the left flank second half.
Cook did ok and don't think bigi did as badly as people make out.
Click to expand...
We kept passing the ball out left to Stokes and then just left him there with ball and every time he therefore just had to keep passing the ball backwards.

As you say, zero support.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #486
MOTM for me was Vincelot.

Murphy poor, Lameiras poor, dreadful mistake by Phillips when we were very much in the ascendancy and once that goal went in we were always going to struggle.

Walsall a better team for me than Burton, but seemingly Burton keep finding a way to win.

Have thought our defence has needed sorting out for some time. Phillips and Haynes for me are not good enough for what we need, with Phillips especially being responsible for a number of goals this season alone.

Really cross my fingers that Lorentzson is fit very soon.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #487
Maybe not much support but still thought he was poor today

Fleck too was dire
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #488
covcity4life said:
Maybe not much support but still thought he was poor today

Fleck too was dire
Click to expand...

I though fleck was one our best players first half, but he was the polar opposite second.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #489
stupot07 said:
I though fleck was one our best players first half, but he was the polar opposite second.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Click to expand...
Yep. Him and Vincelot were excellent first half.

I thought we started the second half really well too and looked the team likely to score, but that goal out of the blue due to Phillips' dreadful error really seemed to knock the stuffing out of us and we looked clueless from that point on.

Hopefully the clamour for Lameiras to be included will now cease.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 16, 2016
  • #490
stupot07 said:
I though fleck was one our best players first half, but he was the polar opposite second.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Click to expand...

Couldn't even trap ball by end

Bigi was only 1 passing it fwd from midfield at end
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
Next
First Prev 14 of 17 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?