Search results

That's your (and I guess 98% of thi forums posters) opinion. Which you are entitled to.

So when Fisher says they expect 2-3k at an interim groundshare he could be right. And if the team performs well that could attract more?

Your reply is offensive and abusive. Please try to accept that you are no more or better supporter than I am. Even if we groundshare there will be supporters following in thousands. Should we move to another stadium then there will be the same buzz as when we moved to the Ricoh. Only difference...

Suffice how?

I thought the petition was about keeping the club in Coventry and that it was general consensus that a lot of people from other clubs participated. So you can't take that number and claim the Trust represent 13k. And poll's on this forum can't be representative either as it has become the...

Don't you find that just a little bit arrogant? Your answer is a replica of the answer I got from PWKH when I asked if he would participate in a debate with Fisher moderated by the Trust. He said 'No. It wouldn't matter'. And it is a replica of what Fisher said when asked if he would...

Really? How can you know?

Clever answer ... :claping hands:

The one doesn't exclude the other ...

He used 'don't know' when he could not justify or defend previous boards decisions. He used 'can't tell' when he was questioned about groundshare and new stadium. There's a difference. And I actually didn't find him slippery or evasive - if only people would have let him explain without...

They were all sold or have their contract run down by the board headed by Ranson and Hoffman. Not Fisher's fault - and he is not actually going to criticise previous regimes under sisu. But he wasn't defending that either.

At the moment??? Wasn't somebody on Monday trying to nail Fisher and Brookfield on the issue of limited's purpose as registered at the companies House?

They were always going to pull out. Where would they have gotten the money to pay out sisu?

No, it's been a while since the leaders last read their own website: Aims & Objectives. I think I will put a link here if any of the leaders would like to be reminded of the purpose of the Trust. http://www.skybluetrust.co.uk/index.php/about-the-trust

They have done so already.

If he is not in a position to answer questions about groundshare or position of new stadium because the FL won't approve the plans until we exit administration - then why keep asking those questions? Yes, they are important questions, but he simply can't tell for another two weeks or so.

Maybe they heard the answers but didn't listen?

I fully agree to the above.

A lot of them actually.

But ACL has not claimed the lease is broken - as they could when the club defaulted on the payments - so the lease itself is not part of the debts and can not be part of the administration. I raised that question when we entered admin, but noone knew the answer.