Search results

The plan is based on the assumption that sisu would buckle if they lose out on a few thousand tickets. I don't think would even blink. Don't underestimate their resolve - they have not (yet anyway) bluffed as assumed by many. I believe they will follow through their plan - it's the only way...

Now this part is what I find interesting: First I note that board decisions are based on numerical votes. I have said many times this is 'normal practice' by investment funds. It does raise the question, why they didn't demand numerical control when they took over ccfc: From FAQ-1 in the...

That would be excellent - and a new experience for me. I only ever get :facepalm:

He really is an amateur - Gary Hoffman is. How can he forget that formal proposals must be delivered on letter headed paper.

I missed the jesting ... sorry! No excuse from me. I simply missed it. Yes - Holdings haven't filed accounts, but that could change. But as they seem to be transfering everything to Otium ... which haven't filed accounts either ... I guess they will be waiting until they know how ACL will vote...

I am sorry - I should have put in 'Can we sign free agents when in administration? If not - I hope we get out soon!' ... Oh, I did! But Holdings have most of the player contracts ... are they not allowed to sign another?

I can not name my friend - he is a player, but not with us ... but this may change. The midfielder is Gerado Bruna. http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/gerardo-bruna/profil/spieler_70772.html

I haven't seen it reported anywhere - maybe because I haven't searched for it - but apparantly we are on the brink of signing an argentinian attacking midfielder. His initials are GB and I have this from a friend of him, who only last night spoke to him on the phone. Gerado ... oh, damn I gave...

The story TF tells over and over is this: sisu/ccc agree a plan that will have sisu buy the Higgs shares. Sisu would buy out the ACL mortgage - yes, at a discounted level (which required the rent strike, my opinion). Sisu would then discharge the mortgage, and by doing so increase the share...

This is where it all began ... but nobody cares about the origin of the mess. Where the bloody Hell are the reporters? Fisher has been saying this for months, yet all people do is call him a liar. Noone dare challenge the CCC or ACL. Nobody ask about Hoffman/Elliot and their timely arrival on...

By all means - go ahead. Remember to count all my different usernames.

If it's no longer 'your' team, why would you wish for relegation? That sounds to me like you still care, so get behind the team and hope for promotion.

Revisit the forums - available on YouTube. Fisher actually managed to explain the plan despite the background noise. He didn't put numbers in, so I assume the £30m is your guess. Anyway, they are looking for a setup similar to the Ricoh, only in a smaller scale, but certainly with a lot more...

Stadium sponsorship? Profit from sell off lease/land to other operations? Income from other operations (ACL like)? How is that influencing your calculation? There are probably a lot more cost and income left out.

Did they ever actually 'buy' Prozone? Or was it Ranson's payment for his shares? And wasn't Prozone profitable? What would need funding? When Prozone was sold - did any money find way back to Ranson?

No, it's not the same difference. When sisu sell they will only be able to sell club and stadium in one package. So why have the two separated? By having the stadium as part of the SBS&L group the club will benefit FFP wise from all income streams - unlike the situation today. Please explain...

SBS&L will own it - either directly or through Otium or ccfc Holdings. It will NOT be a sisu owned stadium - that would defy all logics as that would create the situation they are escaping. In addition the club alone would not be saleable when sisu want out.

As for the administration costs it will be Otium (the club) - funded by sisu in the form of loans. The JR I think is called by sisu, so they will pay the fee's directly.

I think I will just quote one key sentence from the post you refer to:

Are you suggesting they are doing something illegal - if so, what exactly?