Search results

What ideal is that? Peace in Europe? Which ideal was that? The abolishment of the death penalty? Peace in Europe? Human rights charter? ECJ? Anti discrimination laws? Workers’ rights, including guaranteed paid holidays and maximum hours? Guaranteeing these rights for gig jobs? New laws for...

That is exactly it. If it has the word EU in front of it, it is a dictatorship. If the Express, Mail, Telegraph or Sun report something it is unbiased reporting. If May's cabinet make a deal we have to accept it. Not to do so would mean a hard Brexit and no one voted for that..... that would be...

Will you finally tell us who "they" are and whose vote is being lost? I am not trying to score points, I am just asking you what you are on about. Are you playing at being thick? Or can't you just answer the question?

Another sweeping unsubstantiated post. Same every day.

17,4 Million voted without knowing the outcome. One possible outcome is a hard Brexit. That is their responsibility. It is not a question of being happy or not, they have to take responsibility for their action. If it’s bad they will have to take the blame from the majority of the country who...

They are not as bad as each other as they have just proven in voting for the authority of the sovereign parliament as opposed to Davis and co in May’s cabinet. You do love sweeping and unsubstantiated statements.

What vote are you on about? They would be in the second chamber. They won’t have a veto if the second chamber is majority VOTING.

They aren’t losing a vote. They are losing a veto ( should it ever happen). They have the choice of accepting or leaving. By the time it gets that far ( if it ever does ) there will have been negotiations and debates and the governments will know the feelings of their electorates, There may have...

Now the concern is that a hard Brexit will be worse than a deal is coming out. Why? I thought we were leaving, get over it, and anything is better than the EU Schulz Juncker dictatorship ( Astute‘s fear should Merkel agree with Schulz ). Personally, I think anything is better than the present...

You didn’t say one is supposed to control the other. The Parliament and the Commission are supposed to control each other as a check and balance thing. The Spiegel explained that and gave an example of Schulz switching an enquiry into Juncker’s tax deal to a date after his election.

If Merkel were to agree to his demands, which she won’t, there would still be the other 26 countries to convince. The people of Europe would decide who the MEPs were and who their governments were. You can be pro EU and disagree with Schulz‘ vision. In fact most people don’t agree with his...

What has Juncker got to do with Germany? In one of your posts it said that the agreement was that Schulz leaves in 2017. That two people have top jobs is not strange. That they know each other and are friends is not strange, but one is supposed to control the other which is a conflict of...

Yes. Democracy at work and Farage, career politician MEP, says he has nothing but contempt for er... career politicians... Great day for parliamentary democracy.

Why? Because I question your posts?

You do surprise me. Waiting for Captain Dart’s Link.

What’s FriaTaden’s and Breitbart’s take on this?

I’ll tell you when she is re-elected.

Maybe. Maybe not. But, we only have to turn on the TV to see how Trump is dividing to rule.

That’s it. That was what I was looking for... anyway it’s nice seeing these people being defeated especially in a red state and with Trump, Bannon, Farage etc having spoken out for Moore.

And his campaign says they are not accepting it because 51:49 is too small a majority. They want to contest it. So much for right wing democracy. Reminds me of „you lost, get over it“....