Search results

Say you. A Parliament of MEPs elected by all EU citizens not voting on national lines won’t mean a German dictatorship. The opposite actually.

Those that are against it will leave. I call that voting against it. You can call it deciding against it. Whatever. There is a choice. Take it or leave it.

I understand that your head hurts. Complicated for you is it?

I get what Martin Schultz says, but I haven’t got a clue what you are trying to prove. Maybe you should try explaining instead of playing games.

He wants to replace that along with the commission, with a second chamber. It would have to be weighted to take population into account imo.

Here: „The drafting process of such a constitutional treaty, Schulz said, should involve citizens across the Continent. Once drafted, it would “be presented to the member states, and those who are against it will simply leave the EU,” he said, adding that Poland was already systematically...

No. He said we will write a convention giving the powers which will be voted on. Those who vote no leave. That is when it will be decided, not when they are through. If an army is not in the plan it won’t happen. They are not giving us a hard time. They gave us a list of priorities to be...

No. He said this has to be discussed before voting. Not after.

That’s her calculation, but the greens also want the families to come in order to help integration. SPD is not alone and it is not so one sided.

Now that Britain is not there these things can be discussed. Britain blocked these discussions. Brexit has opened the discussions. Good. Let’s here more suggestions.

Depending on what powers are given to the parliament. May or may not be.

You started ignoring me when you said Juncker has announced an EU army and I said he just said it is not on the cards. You kept posting him saying it is not on the cards saying that constitutes an announcement that it is on the cards.

I just answered you when you asked what does that mean? with 'exactly what it says'. I am saying the same as all other news outlets. Or have you found something different?

What is opposite to me? I am intrigued.

Merkel was not keen on it. She didn't slam it though. I assume it won't be accepted by CDU or CSU, and that we will have a minority government. A bit like in the UK with the SPD supporting some things, but not things that are absolutely opposed to, in return for some support on something else (...

Having more say in the way the EU governs your country. It doesn't have 100% power anyway, and that has not been suggested. His model is the German Federal System which is more democratic than either the EU system or the British System. In adddition to the federal government in Berlin, the 16...

The Guardian doesn't need an excuse, but the Telegraph has obviously bent the truth as I explained.

Again, exactly what I said when you said it was going to happen, and I also said that Merkel's party ( Dobrindt as an example ) sees other things as more important. Everything as I said. I would be for it, but the right and Wagenrecht from the extreme left are all against a federal Europe. That...

What it says. If you don't like it, you can leave... as the UK is doing. It is the only way to move forward and improve democracy in the EU.

No. Because at the moment it means that a small country such as Estonia could veto something which 27 have agreed upon. That is not democratic. Countries voting for their people is not as democratic as the people voting directy for their representatives in the EU. With more power to MEPs the...