Search results

So, in this context "interested" means nothing? Yet, we are supposed to believe that ACL only acted in the best interests of the football club? If they'd have acted in the best interests of the football club would they not have suggested the interested parties speak with the owners about...

Just to also add I believe that for anyone to be surprised that a hedge fund acts like, well, a hedge fund is a little backwards. And, who was it that forced a hedge fund upon us?

I never suggested that ACL were lying. However, traditionally in a dispute you will find both parties have extremely entrenched positions and believe, firmly, that they are in the right. Generally, in my opinion, the truth lies somewhere in the middle and, without a doubt, in my opinion, ACL's...

Not in my opinion. I still find it difficult to understand how fans on here seem to accept every word said by acl.

Why should it embarrass you MMM? Just because someone else has a different viewpoint? Christ, you must spend a lot of time embarrassed!

Is there not just a little bit of hypocrisy over the suggested actions above and the criticisim you have made over the dealings of SISU?

No. Liquidation means the dissolution of the company by the selling of all assets to pay debts. Insolvency means you are trading whilst being unable to service your debts. (In simple terms).

Ok, fair enough. I think I've been through the blaming stage and the no hope stage and have arrived at a point where I'm finding the disparaging remarks made by some fans to other fans, just because they offer a different viewpoint, a little depressing. I now just want to see the back of...

Yes, liquidation normally follows administration. Perhaps, people will now understand the dangers of the action taken by ACL.

Why is it anymore absurd that someone would pay the true value of the club rather than buy it on the cheap? Although, I apologise if I remain optimistic that my football club may have a future - much better to blame SISU for all the evils in the world?

in a better position today than it would have been if ACL had won the court hearing and placed us into administration? No-one can answer that question at this time but, dependant upon your view, if we don't get a points deduction we could be. Let's hope we manage to get promotion this...

I don't believe planning laws quite work like that.

You can't press and take forward a winding up order without it having the effect of "winding up" the organisation. You were previously advised to goggle it - I'd suggest you just put those two words together and try and guess what happens when a company is, "wound up."

Thank you vickie. In 12 words you accurately summarised my thoughts I, "fail to see why there is such a love-fear for ACL."

So, because some people don't see things as black and white as you they aren't supporters of the club?

I haven't said anything about supporting SISU. The point I made was I cannot understand how ACL are seen as some wonderful benefactor of ccfc. All they have done is charge unaffordable rent, offer a reduced, but still unaffordable, rent and when SISU have said no refused an offer of third party...

How does that work? If ACL had their way the football club would be entering administration tomorrow which is only a short hop away from liquidation. Even now people are advocating ACL lock the doors. Who would that benefit? If ACL are so benevolent to the good folks of coventry surely...

How can you hope for any of those things? Do you really believe that they would benefit the football club?

My first put down on this forum.... .... I was kind of hoping it may have come from someone with a little more wit than hill83.

Do they have a choice? I thought they had first refusal?