It has quite a lot to do with it. He is proposing that we sell/give (I believe he would want us to give it) a tax payer funded property that is worth million's to a HF. If he has not paid tax to the council, of course it will not affect him one bit. But it does effect all other tax payers. I am...
And why is it always ACL/CCC who have to back down? Answer me that without the owner slant. And in reply to a earlier post from you on this thread, WHO was it who ripped the heart out of the city. The bastards who took us to NT, that's who.
Well if I could be there Sunday, i would be more happy supporting the geriatric team playing in sky blue colours at the Ricoh than travel 34mls to watch our league team play at "Home".
But by the sounds of it the Ricoh will be fairly packed on Sunday. Anyone who sees that will know there is a good sized fan base waiting for the club to come back to it true roots. where as having just a few hundred at Sixfields tells our owners they a fecked up big time.
I fully agree with your opening post. But I am afraid City fans will never be in complete agreement about what is best for the club. Some believe going to Sixfields is supporting the team (unless your true sky blue, who openly states he is supporting our "wonderful owners") but are also...
You could well be right, but if you are that is even more worrying. Because if he carn't get a longer term contract it would suggest the the "he is shite" crowd are right.