For me, a lot of what we are seeing now goes back to the planning in the summer.
By 17 April, everyone at the club knew we were going up. From that point there should have been a clear plan for the 25-man Premier League squad. Who was good enough, who wasn't, who needed moving on and where we needed to strengthen.
I think Lampard and Austin have been too loyal to some of the players who got us promoted.
That loyalty is understandable after what they achieved, but once the season finished there needed to be a lot more ruthlessness. The standards and expectations had to go up because the level had gone up, and there should have been no room for sentiment when making decisions about the squad.
In my opinion, players like Wilson, Bidwell, Brau, Lati, Woolfenden, Kitching, Raphael, Bassette, BTA and Simms are not good enough for the Premier League, and those decisions should have been made early.
The club should have made it clear to them and their agents that they were not part of the plans for the Premier League squad and should look for moves elsewhere.
Brau, Kitching, Raphael and Bassette have gone out on loan, but too many of the others are still here, while we still lack enough quality, cover and genuine competition in several positions.
The problem with leaving it late is obvious. Once Championship clubs have already done most of their business, it becomes much harder to move players who are now on Premier League wages.
That leaves us with players taking up squad places and wages that could have been used to strengthen areas where we are still short.
For me, that is where Dean Austin has to take some responsibility.
He was promoted from Head of Recruitment to Sporting Director on 3 July, with Jamie Johnson moving up to Head of Recruitment.
Given how important this summer was, I think it is fair to ask whether promoting from within was the right decision.
Was Austin really the best person available for such an important job?
There were people around with far more Premier League experience in Sporting Director or Director of Football roles.
Paul Mitchell has worked at Southampton, Spurs, Leipzig, Monaco and Newcastle.
Dougie Freedman did a very good job at Palace.
Mike Rigg has worked at Manchester City and Fulham.
Kevin Thelwell has Premier League experience and previously worked with Lampard at Everton.
I'm not saying any of them would definitely have come here, but I do think it is fair to ask whether we should have gone for someone with more experience at the exact point the club was moving into the Premier League.
Then there is the loss of Dr Claire-Marie Roberts.
I think that could be more important than people realise.
She was a big part of the performance side of the club and since she left there have been plenty of comments about the lack of fitness, intensity and confidence.
I'm not saying her departure is the reason for what we are seeing, but whatever the cause, the running and tackling numbers have not been good enough.
You cannot be one of the least intense teams in the league and expect to survive.
The tactics are another concern.
I have no problem with going 5-4-1 away to Arsenal, Man City or Liverpool. That makes sense.
What I don't understand is using the same sort of approach at home against teams like Brighton, especially when we spent the summer signing players who look much better suited to a 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3.
It feels like we recruited for one way of playing and then became too cautious and indecisive once the season started.
I also think we need a specialist defensive coach and a better set-piece coach. Hopefully Lampard brings in Ashley Cole because he could improve the out of possession side of the team and help MVE adapt to the Premier League and fulfil his potential.
There is also the question of team selection.
We still don't seem completely sure how we want to play, and expensive new signings like Yirenkyi and Tchaouna have spent too much time on the bench when, in my opinion, they should have been starting.
For me, the biggest problem is that the club wasn't proactive enough.
Too many players who should have been moved on are still here.
The Sporting Director appointment is open to question.
The Performance Director role still hasn't been replaced.
We still look short of quality in several positions.
And tactically, we still don't seem settled on how we want to play.
None of those things on their own explains the poor start.
But put them all together and I think you can see why we have struggled.
By 17 April, everyone at the club knew we were going up. From that point there should have been a clear plan for the 25-man Premier League squad. Who was good enough, who wasn't, who needed moving on and where we needed to strengthen.
I think Lampard and Austin have been too loyal to some of the players who got us promoted.
That loyalty is understandable after what they achieved, but once the season finished there needed to be a lot more ruthlessness. The standards and expectations had to go up because the level had gone up, and there should have been no room for sentiment when making decisions about the squad.
In my opinion, players like Wilson, Bidwell, Brau, Lati, Woolfenden, Kitching, Raphael, Bassette, BTA and Simms are not good enough for the Premier League, and those decisions should have been made early.
The club should have made it clear to them and their agents that they were not part of the plans for the Premier League squad and should look for moves elsewhere.
Brau, Kitching, Raphael and Bassette have gone out on loan, but too many of the others are still here, while we still lack enough quality, cover and genuine competition in several positions.
The problem with leaving it late is obvious. Once Championship clubs have already done most of their business, it becomes much harder to move players who are now on Premier League wages.
That leaves us with players taking up squad places and wages that could have been used to strengthen areas where we are still short.
For me, that is where Dean Austin has to take some responsibility.
He was promoted from Head of Recruitment to Sporting Director on 3 July, with Jamie Johnson moving up to Head of Recruitment.
Given how important this summer was, I think it is fair to ask whether promoting from within was the right decision.
Was Austin really the best person available for such an important job?
There were people around with far more Premier League experience in Sporting Director or Director of Football roles.
Paul Mitchell has worked at Southampton, Spurs, Leipzig, Monaco and Newcastle.
Dougie Freedman did a very good job at Palace.
Mike Rigg has worked at Manchester City and Fulham.
Kevin Thelwell has Premier League experience and previously worked with Lampard at Everton.
I'm not saying any of them would definitely have come here, but I do think it is fair to ask whether we should have gone for someone with more experience at the exact point the club was moving into the Premier League.
Then there is the loss of Dr Claire-Marie Roberts.
I think that could be more important than people realise.
She was a big part of the performance side of the club and since she left there have been plenty of comments about the lack of fitness, intensity and confidence.
I'm not saying her departure is the reason for what we are seeing, but whatever the cause, the running and tackling numbers have not been good enough.
You cannot be one of the least intense teams in the league and expect to survive.
The tactics are another concern.
I have no problem with going 5-4-1 away to Arsenal, Man City or Liverpool. That makes sense.
What I don't understand is using the same sort of approach at home against teams like Brighton, especially when we spent the summer signing players who look much better suited to a 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3.
It feels like we recruited for one way of playing and then became too cautious and indecisive once the season started.
I also think we need a specialist defensive coach and a better set-piece coach. Hopefully Lampard brings in Ashley Cole because he could improve the out of possession side of the team and help MVE adapt to the Premier League and fulfil his potential.
There is also the question of team selection.
We still don't seem completely sure how we want to play, and expensive new signings like Yirenkyi and Tchaouna have spent too much time on the bench when, in my opinion, they should have been starting.
For me, the biggest problem is that the club wasn't proactive enough.
Too many players who should have been moved on are still here.
The Sporting Director appointment is open to question.
The Performance Director role still hasn't been replaced.
We still look short of quality in several positions.
And tactically, we still don't seem settled on how we want to play.
None of those things on their own explains the poor start.
But put them all together and I think you can see why we have struggled.