Will get pounded for that. Needed a TD whatever they did. Even if turnover on downs Buccs had done nothing on previous 3 possessions.Can't believe they did not go for it on 4th down
Did look a manageable runAlso stupid decision by Rodgers not to try and run it it on 3rd down. He had loads of space and tried to fit it in a tiny window. Even if he doesn't get it in then it make LaFluer's decision much easier for him on 4th and 1/2
Surely they'd prefer the Bills. Kansas are unstoppable when they turn up.So, who do we think the Bucs would prefer to play? Who would their best chance be against?
Bills. Think Kelce would give their secondary nightmares.So, who do we think the Bucs would prefer to play? Who would their best chance be against?
Brady started well but faded horribly.2 of those interception s were really ugly.I thought both QB's were very hit and miss tonight.
Maybe he should change his name to Errant Rodgers.
Yes, Brady was breezing it first half. It did all go horribly wrong though as the game wore on. Rodgers looked great at times, but was also guilty of some wayward throws and he really should have just carried on that that play rather than trying to throw to the end zone.Brady started well but faded horribly.2 of those interception s were really ugly.
Rodgers played pretty well but was lucky to keep the ball on those sacks he never saw coming.
Looked strange at the time. Fixed on his receiver even though it looked like he had double coverage.
so it came down to the analytics dept apparently. 0.5% difference whether they go for it on 4th & 8 or kick the FG.
That sounds like misuse of analytics to me. 0.5% difference is nothing compared to tying the game or brining it down to a field goal and changing nothing on the scores.so it came down to the analytics dept apparently. 0.5% difference whether they go for it on 4th & 8 or kick the FG.
Even if Rodgers just runs the seemingly minimum open 5/6 yards in front of him it's 4th & 2-3 which takes the decision to a different place.
There's certain teams (browns) in particular take analytics as gospel. Over analysis seems to overlook the obvious.That sounds like misuse of analytics to me. 0.5% difference is nothing compared to tying the game or brining it down to a field goal and changing nothing on the scores.
I saw one with Mac Jones being projected ahead of Justin Fields. What do you think about that?So first major mock draft has 5 QBs going in top 15 picks. Most for about 20 years.
Going to see possibly the biggest QB rotation in NFL history.
Teams projected to move established traditional pocket passers on for more mobile options on the back of the success of the likes of Mahomes, Allen, Herbert. Yet a market for these traditional QBs is there with some win-now teams like the 49ers and Colts. Also be surprised if one of those 1st round picks of Jones to Patriots happens -Belichick is going to take one of the experienced QBs that becomes available - odds on Stafford or Garropolo.
Don't get that.I saw one with Mac Jones being projected ahead of Justin Fields. What do you think about that?
Not a surprise. Issues with management. No real chance to improve next couple of seasons due to no draft capital or cap space for free agency. Not a team free agents are going to want to go even if Watson was QB.
He's already requested a trade.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?