St Austells Proper Job tonight......lovely drink !! You don't need many though, so don't wind me up later......joke !I knew about the first report, the answer in defence to the first report and got the final decision a couple of days ago. Maybe after yourself. I didn’t say the defence was the final decision. I said there was a criticism of the first report. It was described in the article as scathing. Was overridden though. Which is what I said when I got the final decision. Where’s the lie?
They're expensive by comparison. I like a Gills from Wolverhampton, cheap but cheerful !
Tommy Robinson will end up winning European elections if Brexit is delayed, Rees-Mogg warns
Weird the usual Project Fear lot haven’t brought this one up
Leaves very own project fear.
Is it really project fear? For me it is proper fear.Tommy Robinson will end up winning European elections if Brexit is delayed, Rees-Mogg warns
Weird the usual Project Fear lot haven’t brought this one up
Shall we start on Wednesday or would you like to see it even further back? Here is where you tried to say about the EU commission not agreeing with the first one when you could see the second one. The second one agreed with the first one but was even more scathing.I knew about the first report, the answer in defence to the first report and got the final decision a couple of days ago. Maybe after yourself. I didn’t say the defence was the final decision. I said there was a criticism of the first report. It was described in the article as scathing. Was overridden though. Which is what I said when I got the final decision. Where’s the lie?
Oettinger wrote the report against the report. That is their version. The first ombudsman report said ‚stretched‘. I posted an extract 2 days ago. The press release said broke. The final report now says broke. Selmayr will probably fight any attempts to fire him based on the change in wording. As Oettinger claims there is a change. That is truthful.
Can you put a link of the May one up?
Large organisation so things like this will.happen? That is no excuse for someone to be given the top EU job. The job he has got can't be taken away from him at any time. And you now agree that he shouldn't have got it.
The Ombudsman...... Or woman as such said
Mr Selmayr's appointment did not follow EU law, and did not follow the Commission's own rules," the European Ombudsman Emily O Reilly has maintained,
And that was off a link you supplied.
You then tried to say about the commission slamming the first finding. She spoke out after the first finding and those who run the EU slamming what the first enquiry found.
Whichever way you word it he shouldn't have got the position. Both enquiries say the same. Only 15 out of 518 MEP's voted for him to keep his position. And 13 of them are affiliated to Selmayr and Juncker. Yet nothing has happened.
Then you and others constantly tell us that we have a big say in the EU through our MEP's. Is this the same big say that gets ignored when it suits those who run the EU?
„The European Parliament debated the issue and passed a resolution in plenary on 18 April 2018. Given the facts of the inquiry, the Ombudsman agrees with its assessment that the affair damaged trust in EU institutions and that the double-appointments “stretched and possibly even overstretched the limits of the law”.“
It is a large organisation. There will be things like this. Main thing is that we have all the reports... from both sides. Do we have anything on May appointing her loyal lieutenant as head of the UK civil service?
I don’t know what will happen about him resigning. May come under employment law.
Shall we start on Wednesday or would you like to see it even further back? Here is where you tried to say about the EU commission not agreeing with the first one when you could see the second one. The second one agreed with the first one but was even more scathing.
The EU: In, out, shake it all about....
Then you agreed you had seen the second one. This is still Wednesday.
How about going back a couple more days to Monday where I posted the second report again because I had posted before Monday as well.
The EU: In, out, shake it all about....
To which you replied.....again on Monday when you are saying that you hadn't seen it.... But even then you still go back to the first one as it wasn't as scathing as the second you had just read
So yes Mart. You knew all about the second one all the time. Will go back another week if you still try to lie your way out of it.
St Austells Proper Job tonight......lovely drink !! You don't need many though, so don't wind me up later......joke !
Shall we start on Wednesday or would you like to see it even further back? Here is where you tried to say about the EU commission not agreeing with the first one when you could see the second one. The second one agreed with the first one but was even more scathing.
The EU: In, out, shake it all about....
Then you agreed you had seen the second one. This is still Wednesday.
How about going back a couple more days to Monday where I posted the second report again because I had posted before Monday as well.
The EU: In, out, shake it all about....
To which you replied.....again on Monday when you are saying that you hadn't seen it.... But even then you still go back to the first one as it wasn't as scathing as the second you had just read
So yes Mart. You knew all about the second one all the time. Will go back another week if you still try to lie your way out of it.
Goes way beyond an opinion. How can we trust a word Jacob says on anything
Shall we start on Wednesday or would you like to see it even further back? Here is where you tried to say about the EU commission not agreeing with the first one when you could see the second one. The second one agreed with the first one but was even more scathing.
The EU: In, out, shake it all about....
Then you agreed you had seen the second one. This is still Wednesday.
How about going back a couple more days to Monday where I posted the second report again because I had posted before Monday as well.
The EU: In, out, shake it all about....
To which you replied.....again on Monday when you are saying that you hadn't seen it.... But even then you still go back to the first one as it wasn't as scathing as the second you had just read
So yes Mart. You knew all about the second one all the time. Will go back another week if you still try to lie your way out of it.
Goes way beyond an opinion. How can we trust a word Jacob says on anything
Goes way beyond an opinion. How can we trust a word Jacob says on anything
Goes way beyond an opinion. How can we trust a word Jacob says on anything
I wouldn’t pay too much attention to the euro obsessive Mr Saunders whose own articles of the 1975 referendum are a convenient re writing of history
The question was ironic considering the person who made the original comment sucked up to mass murderers and torturers himself only 30 years ago. Mogg was from what I saw was widely applauded and only said what he did because of some rather silly character on his right
Shocking that you’d even try to stick up and deflect away from him. What next? Justifying his extreme views on abortion?
Bollocks Mart. You know it came.out last year. You said hopefully Selmayr would resign then people could see there would be transparency in the EU. Then I pointed out that it was last year. You then went quiet on the matter for a couple of days. Then you made out that the EU commission was the last word said on the subject again.As far as I can trace, the second one came out on 12. February. I didn’t know about it at 06:43 on Wednesday 13. February. When did you find out?
OMG twisting it again I see.Yes Astute. When was your link to the final decision? When did you point it out to me that there was a final decision. The first report conclusions were ambiguous and not binding. They were criticised for that.
The whole discussion is not about whether Selmayr appointment was right or wrong. The claim was that the EU is corrupt and not accountable.
If the ombudsman‘s report means that Semlmayr is dropped after the EU elections by the new EC, then that proves that it is democratically accountable. The fact that we can follow both sides of the argument shows that the EU is transparent. In this case more So than with May‘s civil service head‘s appointment.
Not praising the EU, but correcting people like yourself.
Bollocks Mart. You know it came.out last year. You said hopefully Selmayr would resign then people could see there would be transparency in the EU. Then I pointed out that it was last year. You then went quiet on the matter for a couple of days. Then you made out that the EU commission was the last word said on the subject again.
OMG twisting it again I see.
So are you saying that if Selmayr went it would show transparency in the EU?
The first report said it was wrong. The EU disagreed. The second report said it was wrong. The EU ignored it again.
Transparency in the EU? The one thing transparent is it is a waste of time having a watchdog in the EU because when it proves they have done wrong even when in law they ignore the findings and carry on as usual. You also forgot to mention the MEP'S vote on if Selmayr should keep the position he shouldn't have got. Only 15 out of 518 MEP's voted for him to keep the position. And 13 of them are affiliated to Selmayr and Juncker. Yet they even ignored the MEP's.
And our only say in the EU is through MEP's. This big say in the EU that you constantly tell us that we have. Now you try to deny the truth.
Have you actually heard what he said?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?