Couple of quick points:
1. Could it not be that these owners/chairmen you refer to would rather not delay the inevitable so that the elite piss off to their super league and they get the football league?
2. It’s difficult to blame owners/chairmen of clubs who are weeks away from going bust and are potentially being given a lifeline. Would you rather fold now or continue, albeit potentially on life support, for a further 5-10 years and see what happens?
Any local glory hunter would switch to the most local super team doing well and international ones would pick whoever is doing well at the time. I can see a few of them becoming a laughing stock with no fans, losing every week and only bringing in TV money.
Honestly, let them go. It may take us time to adjust and for wages to level out but we'll have an actual competition.
I think it's a case of Accrington, Morecambe etc. never having an ambitions on the PL so not giving a shit what the big 6 do. Short term thinking in my view as they could just decide the rest of the pyramid get 0 income after a year if they wanted.
They do... It's called the champions league
If that's the case the others could gang up and say they want the top six to leave to play in a Euro superleague.
Those that think football in this country couldn't survive without those big clubs is nonsense. Who the big clubs are change over time. How many of the initial clubs that won a lot still exist? Or ones like Wolves and Preston who haven't been big clubs for a long time. 70's when the likes of Forest, Derby and Villa were Champions not just here but in Europe.
Man City were playing us in the Championship just 15 years ago and were in the third tier just over 20 years ago when we were top flight. Man U were average until Fergie and the PL era. Chelsea were mid table pre-Abramovich and nearly went out of business before Harding bought them. Tottenham haven't won the league since pre-colour TV. Liverpool hadn't won it for 30 years and spent a few years in mid-table obscurity, which is where Arsenal largely are now. We could've sent Everton down in the late 90's and they've been also-rans for a long period.
Part of the attraction is that you can dream one day that might be you. If you just let a handful of clubs have control of everything then they're never going to let that happen. They'll turn smaller clubs into feeder teams and what's the incentive of watching a team you know will never be allowed to win anything because their job is to help another one do so?
I understand many clubs have severe difficulties at the moment, but this isn't a solution to their problems long term. It's barely a reprieve and if they survive longer term it's more likely to be damaging. It's like a dying patient being given oxygen just to keep going for a short while, which the doctor has full control to remove anytime they like. And the previous conduct of that doctor suggests he's a bit Shipman-esque.
So the £250M they are going to pass down to the lower leagues, they'll virtually pocket that back once they relegate 4 teams and no parachutes.
Spot on & Blackburn have won the same amount of Premier League titles as Liverpool & more than Spurs.
The season Man Utd were relegated they had gates below 30k.I would think a lot of their plastic fans would jump ship pretty quickly if they slipped down the league for any length of time.Don’t get me wrong, I hate the idea.
However there is certainly a difference between a big club and a successful club. You can be successful but not that big, but if you’re big it doesn’t matter how successful you are, you’re.... big. Man Utd were pulling in 50k no matter what, and Spurs for example- they’re always gonna be more of a draw than Leicester no matter how Leicester get on. Man City & Chelsea- they get laughed at now for being Johnny come lately sets of fans, true to a degree, but they also have huge fanbases that predate those years, I think Chelsea are something like 5th on the all time average crowds list.
So with that in mind, what I don’t get is why they’d miss out Newcastle, Villa, Everton etc- all enormous clubs- from their special little gang- the only answer I have is that they’re not part of the ‘clique’, where the membership criteria seems to be regular qualification for the Champions League and a desperate thirst for power & control over the sport.
The whole thing stinks, when push comes to shove I couldn’t pack it in, but this kind of shit sure makes you wonder what the point is when the deck would be so massively stacked against anyone outside this rancid proposed cartel.
They will invite or add the likes of Newcastle, Everton and Villa to their gang probably Leeds, West Ham too and a few more, they need some to be bottom end of the league.Don’t get me wrong, I hate the idea.
However there is certainly a difference between a big club and a successful club. You can be successful but not that big, but if you’re big it doesn’t matter how successful you are, you’re.... big. Man Utd were pulling in 50k no matter what, and Spurs for example- they’re always gonna be more of a draw than Leicester no matter how Leicester get on. Man City & Chelsea- they get laughed at now for being Johnny come lately sets of fans, true to a degree, but they also have huge fanbases that predate those years, I think Chelsea are something like 5th on the all time average crowds list.
So with that in mind, what I don’t get is why they’d miss out Newcastle, Villa, Everton etc- all enormous clubs- from their special little gang- the only answer I have is that they’re not part of the ‘clique’, where the membership criteria seems to be regular qualification for the Champions League and a desperate thirst for power & control over the sport.
The whole thing stinks, when push comes to shove I couldn’t pack it in, but this kind of shit sure makes you wonder what the point is when the deck would be so massively stacked against anyone outside this rancid proposed cartel.
Novelty of a European super League would soon wear off. European cup then Champions League consistently messed with as audiences were falling.The thing I love about football is the away days (ST holder too!) but if you are in a European super league, you never get to do an Ipswich or Norwich away or visit a Hooters in Nottingham (didn't go to Hooters, but you know what I mean). Southend away last year, when you could barely open the pub door because of a howling gale..... As a fan of a super 'club', how many are going to be able to afford away days in Europe only? Not for me.
The thing I love about football is the away days (ST holder too!) but if you are in a European super league, you never get to do an Ipswich or Norwich away or visit a Hooters in Nottingham (didn't go to Hooters, but you know what I mean).
That's key. These big 6 (American owners in particular) have been pushing for individual media deals. Stream income probably wouldn't count as TV money so the pot suddenly isn't so big.Precisely.
It's effectively a loan anyway which is then to be subtracted from the 25% TV rights - rights which are already in decline & will drop off hugely when the clubs can sell their own rights for 8 games each (no doubt all the 'big' games) as that TV revenue is ringfenced for the PL clubs only .
The whole thing is so short-sighted from an EFL point of view & frankly an utter disgrace.
They should go and get fucked, but everyone is desperate for the cash so they'll get their way.
About time the government let some fans in too, if you can go the theater/cinema/pub no reason to not let in 25% capacityThe only hope is the FA stay strong & the other PL clubs refuse it. Majority of EFL clubs seem to have the blinkers on.
The more I think about a Euro League there more I think a lot of clubs wouldn't go for it. Would any Bundeslida teams leave? Would Barca and Real want to move from winning the league every year to the possibility of years without a title. When was the last time one of Inter, AC or Juve didn't win the league?And these big 6 would no longer be the big fish in the pond in a Euroleague.
About time the government let some fans in too, if you can go the theater/cinema/pub no reason to not let in 25% capacity
Might give clubs some breathing room.
The Palladium pictures are mad, there's no way they have maintained 2 metre distancing even though they did once the pics started circulating. Also, having been to the Palladium I'm struggling to believe anything remotely resembling distancing was maintained in the areas outside the main auditorium, as with many old theatres there's not a lot of room to move about.100%
Approx 1,000 people in a 2,200 capacity, confined INDOOR space at London Palladium is perfectly fine but even 10% capacity, say 1,000 people, massively distanced in a 10,000 seater OUTDOOR venue will kill someone's nan apparently
Which of these looks safer?
View attachment 17230View attachment 17231View attachment 17232View attachment 17233
The thing I love about football is the away days (ST holder too!) but if you are in a European super league, you never get to do an Ipswich or Norwich away or visit a Hooters in Nottingham (didn't go to Hooters, but you know what I mean). Southend away last year, when you could barely open the pub door because of a howling gale..... As a fan of a super 'club', how many are going to be able to afford away days in Europe only? Not for me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?