Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Preston at home. (5 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Steve.B50
  • Start date Jan 6, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6 Next Last

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #36
Astute said:
We got outmuscled last time so you say leave a player out with a decent tackle on him and put lightweight players on?
Click to expand...

We got dominated in the middle with Jennings.

If Barca were to play Stoke tomorrow, they wouldn't dop Xavi for Song because Xavi because Song is 'hencher' with a decent tackle.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #37
And Thomas is known for solid tackles?

Go back to the last game. The weather was shite. We wete doing well until Jennings got booked and couldn't risk tackles in bad conditions.
 

sky_blue_up_north

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #38
Biggest game for years IMO, such a great chance of a Wembley final. Win this match and two legged semi, it's within our grasp, I for one am really excited about the game and hope we get a really good gate, we should fear not fear anything from Preston.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #39
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
We got dominated in the middle with Jennings.

If Barca were to play Stoke tomorrow, they wouldn't dop Xavi for Song because Xavi because Song is 'hencher' with a decent tackle.
Click to expand...

No but they would play Busquets.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #40
stupot07 said:
No but they would play Busquets.
Click to expand...

But not ahead of Xavi.

We have Bailey, who can put in a tackle, Thomas can put in a tackle, and for all the moaning you do, Fleck is better off the ball than McSheffry.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #41
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
But not ahead of Xavi.

We have Bailey, who can put in a tackle, Thomas can put in a tackle, and for all the moaning you do, Fleck is better off the ball than McSheffry.
Click to expand...

Fleck is not Xavi and we are not Barcelona.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #42
stupot07 said:
Fleck is not Xavi and we are not Barcelona.
Click to expand...

Fleck can pick pass and isn't strong, and both aren't great off the ball, they are slightly similar players, accept Xavi is lightyears away from Fleck, my point is, Barcelona wouldn't drop a player who is superior on the ball but isn't as strong or fit as the players he was facing.

CCFC need to be proactive, not reactive.

EDIT: I weren't comparing the 2 as such, I was putting it into context.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #43
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Fleck can pick pass and isn't strong, and both aren't great off the ball, they are slightly similar players, accept Xavi is lightyears away from Fleck, my point is, Barcelona wouldn't drop a player who is superior on the ball but isn't as strong or fit as the players he was facing.

CCFC need to be proactive, not reactive.

EDIT: I weren't comparing the 2 as such, I was putting it into context.
Click to expand...

But we wouldn't be dropping fleck, he isn't a regular first team starter.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #44
stupot07 said:
But we wouldn't be dropping fleck, he isn't a regular first team starter.
Click to expand...

He has started last 2 league games... He got dropped for Spurs, but came on and played well, better than who he replaced, as did all the subs, tbf.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #45
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
He has started last 2 league games...
Click to expand...

Because bailey's loan had expired.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #46
stupot07 said:
Because bailey's loan had expired.
Click to expand...

What about for Shrewsbury then? Did he not play his way into that XI?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #47
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
What about for Shrewsbury then? Did he not play his way into that XI?
Click to expand...

What about the game after the Shrewsbury match?
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2013
  • #48
stupot07 said:
What about the game after the Shrewsbury match?
Click to expand...

We'll have to wait and see...

As for Spurs, it was logical we pick 2 defensive options.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #49
Otis said:
1 win and a draw.

We only need to beat Preston on penalties remember!!

I am convinced we will be better against Preston this time round. Last time we played Barton in the midfield and I think it was too physical a type of game for him. We need some strength and grit in the middle of the park and not quite so much flair.

Be interesting to see what team MR picks. The game will suit Clarke up front though for sure. He has just the sort of physical presence that could cause their defence problems.

But just thinking about the 3,000 tickets for them and how that is going to look on Sky. Going to be pretty awful isn't it, if the cameras are in the Tesco Stand and all the City fans are in the Tesco Stand and the away end looks full. You are only going to see Preston fans on the TV and nowt else.

Really hope we get a good crowd for this. Hoping for 15,000 again, but not holding my breath!
Click to expand...

hummmmm:thinking about:

you were the most negative out of all our fans when we drew with preston and im pretty sure you said something along the lines of "i see nothing to suggest it will be any different the next time we play them"
 

TrueSkyBlueLiam

Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #50
We were useless infront of goal last time against PNE, so we need 2 strikers this time. If we push forward more, we should be fine, then onwards to Wembley
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #51
covcity4life said:
hummmmm:thinking about:

you were the most negative out of all our fans when we drew with preston and im pretty sure you said something along the lines of "i see nothing to suggest it will be any different the next time we play them"
Click to expand...


Yep, if we play the same tactics.

It will be the same outcome I think unless we compete on an equally physical footing.

I just don't think you can get away with the playing of the likes of Barton against the likes of Preston. Too easy to get outmuscled by this type of side. That's where we went wrong last time.

All I was saying was that it would be the same result if we deploy the same tactics and personnel.

We need to beat them at their own game .... or least be cute. A little more physicality to go along side the neat play.

Can we beat them? Yes, course we can. Can we beat them if we play the same way we did last time out, I would say not.

And you keep talking about my negativity, yet I was very confident of us beating Shrewsbury and have said our name is on the JPT.

You never seem to mention my positivity and only allude to any perceived negativity.
 
Last edited: Jan 7, 2013

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #52
yeh we will need to fight more for sure,especially in middle of the park

hopefully l clarke will add alot of aggression to the team leading from the front now

still think we should try to create chances with same passing we have been,dont wanna see us playing hoofball and doubt robins does either
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #53
Is Blair Adams avaliable Thursday? I seem to remember his loan being up after Saturday.. If he isn't then we may have to start Clarke and Christie.

I agree with Otis need more bite in Midfield and Barton won't provide that unfortunately. Can't see Baker not starting against Preston which was the difference last time, so our midfield will probably end up McSheffery Bailey Jennings Moussa Baker..
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #54
RoboCCFC90 said:
Is Blair Adams avaliable Thursday? I seem to remember his loan being up after Saturday.. If he isn't then we may have to start Clarke and Christie.

I agree with Otis need more bite in Midfield and Barton won't provide that unfortunately. Can't see Baker not starting against Preston which was the difference last time, so our midfield will probably end up McSheffery Bailey Jennings Moussa Baker..
Click to expand...

What difference would the same midfield that got "battered" last time, make this time? Ok, Baker didn't start, but it was the same old story when he came on.

I hope MR mixes it up, brings in Fleck and hopefully Thomas, if he's fit enough.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #55
they will know how preston are gonna play this time, im sure they have worked on ways to counter them
 

LJC_CCFC

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #56
IMO I think the difference will be shockingly not having DMC. Having the physical presence of Leon Clarke up top, we give us an out ball and the chance to mix it up if needs be. Clarke also scored against PNE in scunnys 3-2 defeat in october, so he knows how to play against them.If we can utilise Leon in this way I'm confident of a 3-0 city win. They are also missing their best player from the 1-1 draw with us Lee Holmes
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #57
covcity4life said:
they will know how preston are gonna play this time, im sure they have worked on ways to counter them
Click to expand...

MR said he knew how a Westley side would play...

I think CT4 and Fleck will counter how they play, they can keep possession better under pressure than our other players, I think Spurs proved this.

There's no point trying to go out there and 'outmuscle' PNE, we should go out there with a game plan to keep the ball and create as many chances as possible.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #58
what position does he play ljc?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #59
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
MR said he knew how a Westley side would play...

I think CT4 and Fleck will counter how they play, they can keep possession better under pressure than our other players, I think Spurs proved this.

There's no point trying to go out there and 'outmuscle' PNE, we should go out there with a game plan to keep the ball and create as many chances as possible.
Click to expand...

But there was no pressure, the game was already over at half time - they could go out and enjoy themselves.
 

LJC_CCFC

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #60
covcity4life said:
what position does he play ljc?
Click to expand...

Who Holmes, normally left wing but with Westley in charge he could easily be playing centre half
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #61
stupot07 said:
But there was no pressure, the game was already over at half time - they could go out and enjoy themselves.
Click to expand...

I don't think that was the case, Spurs were going for more, they don't do as well when they took off Parker, and for the 10m before he got took off, we played better with Barton, CT and Fleck.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #62
Fleck is a liability off the ball and against PNE I'm not sure how much point there is having him there. Personally if we keep the ball down rather than hoof it to Baker, that's half the battle won.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #63
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Fleck is a liability off the ball and against PNE I'm not sure how much point there is having him there. Personally if we keep the ball down rather than hoof it to Baker, that's half the battle won.
Click to expand...

How is Fleck a liability?

The same people who think Fleck shouldn't start for being a 'liability' off the ball, think McSheffrey should start! So tell me, how is Fleck more of a liability than McSheff, the guy who exposes his LB every time he plays.

Oh, I forgot this, we let too many crosses come in v PNE, so why would we McSheff? And Christie for that matter.

And Fleck can actually keep the ball on deck, but you're against starting him?
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #64
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
How is Fleck a liability?

The same people who think Fleck shouldn't start for being a 'liability' off the ball, think McSheffrey should start! So tell me, how is Fleck more of a liability than McSheff, the guy who exposes his LB every time he plays.

Oh, I forgot this, we let too many crosses come in v PNE, so why would we McSheff? And Christie for that matter.

And Fleck can actually keep the ball on deck, but you're against starting him?
Click to expand...

I didn't say anything about Sheff. Fleck will be good in games where we enjoy most of the possession and his skills on the ball get more time. He is not however a grafter or tough tackling midfielder which is more important against a side like PNE.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #65
whats with the wholesale changes attitude?

we have lost 2 games and one was to spurs and the other we dominated

lets keep largely the same team that has given us 8 wins and 2 draws prior
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #66
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I didn't say anything about Sheff. Fleck will be good in games where we enjoy most of the possession and his skills on the ball get more time. He is not however a grafter or tough tackling midfielder which is more important against a side like PNE.
Click to expand...

Would you start Sheff? Yes or no?

You make yourself have lots of possession or not, this is a game we could dominate possession, only PNE will put us under more pressure, I'd rather have Fleck on the ball than say Jennings. Fleck can unlock a defence (3 quality passes down the line that fell perfectly for Adams v Shews (2) and Spurs (1) so when all the fans were crying out for a 'creative' midfielder (very vague statement) we finally get 1 (arguably 2) yet, no one wants him to start?! :facepalm:

BSB, Otis and Stupot07, you are taking a very reactionary approach to this game. We need to be proactive.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #67
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
What difference would the same midfield that got "battered" last time, make this time? Ok, Baker didn't start, but it was the same old story when he came on.

I hope MR mixes it up, brings in Fleck and hopefully Thomas, if he's fit enough.
Click to expand...

Can't see it.. I agree would love to see Conor get in but Mark Robins seems to prefer the five man midfield I named as his trongest midfield, unless Conor is fit enough (which I still think he needs a few more games) and unless he drops Sheffers I can't see either Fleck or Thomas coming in..

Open to being proved wrong!
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #68
Otis said:
Yep, if we play the same tactics.

It will be the same outcome I think unless we compete on an equally physical footing.

I just don't think you can get away with the playing of the likes of Barton against the likes of Preston. Too easy to get outmuscled by this type of side. That's where we went wrong last time.

All I was saying was that it would be the same result if we deploy the same tactics and personnel.

We need to beat them at their own game .... or least be cute. A little more physicality to go along side the neat play.

Can we beat them? Yes, course we can. Can we beat them if we play the same way we did last time out, I would say not.

And you keep talking about my negativity, yet I was very confident of us beating Shrewsbury and have said our name is on the JPT.

You never seem to mention my positivity and only allude to any perceived negativity.
Click to expand...

I don't think we need to compete on a physical footing, we have to make sure we keep the god damn ball on the ground and not in the air! That's where we went wrong last game. Having Fleck and Thomas will help us to do that (with Baker, Bailey and Moussa to assist). You talking of physicality, but how can we be more physical? We can't bring anyone in who is good enough to start, who has this physicality. We need to play our game, and do it well.

On Barton, it wasn't HE was outmuscled by PNE, we Hoofed it up to him and he, being really shit at heading, failed badly, as did the whole team that game. Only person who I can remember winning 1 header was Baker.

On that note, by no means am I comparing the us to Barca, PNE to Stoke, I'm just giving you an example, would Barca take Xavi and other less physical players out the team if they were playing Stoke? No, they wouldn't. They'd keep Messi, Xavi, Iniesta (and co.) in and play their own game and beat Stoke's. On your logic, however, Xavi (and co.) couldn't or shouldn't play because they aren't as physical, it's BS.

I think this is somewhat of a cancer in British football, only nation (of note) who play 4-4-2 is England, and have favoured brute for over etiquette for too long.
 

LJC_CCFC

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #69
The team will be as follows:

Murphy

Christie
Wood
Edge
Adams

Bailey
Jennings

Baker
Moussa
Macca

Clarke

The formation is 4-2-3-1, not 4-4-2 or 4-5-1

If we play the way we have been and take our chances we will win, for all the Preston bullied/battered us we could have won the game if sleeves had headed into what was basically an empty net, we are the favourites lets start acting like it. It is this defeatist/pessimistic attitude that with many other reasons has brought us down to where we are now
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2013
  • #70
RoboCCFC90 said:
Can't see it.. I agree would love to see Conor get in but Mark Robins seems to prefer the five man midfield I named as his trongest midfield, unless Conor is fit enough (which I still think he needs a few more games) and unless he drops Sheffers I can't see either Fleck or Thomas coming in..

Open to being proved wrong!
Click to expand...

Our strongest midfield, at the minute is:

Baker Bailey Fleck Thomas* Moussa

He might not be 100% if so Jennings to come in. Bar that, this midfield is most capable on the ball and good enough off it, Thomas is a typical box-to-box midfielder and plays like his hero, Scholes (obviously not as well as the great man!), Fleck can dictate the tempo we play at, very able on the ball and underrated off it (he isn't great but the way some go on!), Bailey is technically very good, as we know, has a killer pass, as we know, and is very good defensively.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?