Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

New Dr Who (3 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Liquid Gold
  • Start date Jul 16, 2017
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 4 of 7 Next Last

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 18, 2017
  • #106
Otis said:
Because TV has very much been a male dominated world historically. Things have changed greatly over recent years though with women writers and directors and producers finally getting a foothold.

Just simply don't think it was even considered before. Just a this is the way it always is thinking process previously.
Click to expand...
Not really what my point was

If the doctor can regenerate into anything, then what is the story explanation of why he has always been a man. Not the real life explanation.
 

Sky_Blue_Daz

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 18, 2017
  • #107
Bloody uproar as according to reports the starting salary for a female Doctor Who is less then that of a trainee Dalek
 
Reactions: wingy, Captain Dart, vow and 1 other person

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 18, 2017
  • #108
SkyBlue_Bear83 said:
Not really what my point was

If the doctor can regenerate into anything, then what is the story explanation of why he has always been a man. Not the real life explanation.
Click to expand...

The story explanantion though is because of the real life explanation. It's the real people who write the stories. :woot:
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 18, 2017
  • #109
Otis said:
What about a dwarf? A gay? Or a Mexican?
Click to expand...

We just had a Mexican play a female Timelord and there were no complaints!
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 18, 2017
  • #110
Liquid Gold said:
Most shows' viewing figures are dipping, it's just a sign of how people watch their TV now, mainly on catch up or streamed. The BBC still makes shed loads of cash selling Doctor Who around the world so it's not something that is likely to be shelved any time soon. I'd also put some of the decline down to Clara who was almost universally disliked, I'd bet anything figures have risen this season.
Click to expand...
After an initial rise - thought to be due to the change of schedule from autumn to spring - they fell to well below the previous series. The numbers watching on catchup and overseas have also fallen as have sales of Dr Who merchandise.
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2017
  • #111
New Star Trek show has a female captain, just watched a trailer. Nothing new as weve seen that years ago in Voyager but its continuing the trend. Is there a reason for this in terms of revenue? Has there been more girls lining up to watch Star Wars with Episode 7 and Roge One having female leads?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #112
The world is a changing my friend and all we need now is a female Miss Marple and a black Luther.

A disabled Ironside wouldn't go amiss either.
 
Reactions: dutchman, RegTheDonk and olderskyblue

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #113
dutchman said:
Have you read any Doctor Who forums since the announcement was made?
Click to expand...
According to a BBC poll of 12,000 people only 15% were against having a female Doctor.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #114
RegTheDonk said:
New Star Trek show has a female captain, just watched a trailer. Nothing new as weve seen that years ago in Voyager but its continuing the trend. Is there a reason for this in terms of revenue? Has there been more girls lining up to watch Star Wars with Episode 7 and Roge One having female leads?
Click to expand...
Looks like the lack of female leads, on TV at least, might be overstated. BBC looked at the top 50 drams, excluding soaps, from last year and this was the result.
 
Reactions: RegTheDonk

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #115
Christmas special looks like it will be a good one.
 
Reactions: RegTheDonk and Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #116
Yeah, looks good.

Oh and I am finally vindicated at last. Spent my whole life calling the Doctor, Doctor Who, only to be shot down in flames and being sternly told 'his name is the Doctor!!!'

Just been confirmed, his name IS Doctor Who!!
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #117
Otis said:
Yeah, looks good.

Oh and I am finally vindicated at last. Spent my whole life calling the Doctor, Doctor Who, only to be shot down in flames and being sternly told 'his name is the Doctor!!!'

Just been confirmed, his name IS Doctor Who!!
Click to expand...
Keep it to yourself Otis, you want a nerd bloodbath on your hands??
 
Reactions: Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #118
RegTheDonk said:
Keep it to yourself Otis, you want a nerd bloodbath on your hands??
Click to expand...
Or to be strangled to death by knitted cardigan wearing, bespectacled, pot bellied 40 and 50 year olds.
 
Reactions: RegTheDonk

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #119
Otis said:
According to a BBC poll of 12,000 people only 15% were against having a female Doctor.
Click to expand...
Was it a poll of regular Dr Who viewers or a random sample because it hardly matters what people who don't watch the programme think.
This is from a poll of regular Dr Who viewers:
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #120
dutchman said:
Was it a poll of regular Dr Who viewers or a random sample because it hardly matters what people who don't watch the programme think.
This is from a poll of regular Dr Who viewers:
Click to expand...
But surely a poll on the whole would be more likely answered by people who watched or had an interest in the programme.

You would get a few who voted with absolutely no interest, but I can't believe for a second that a load of people who had absolutely no interest would then go out and cast a vote for a show they care nothing about.

BBC just said a poll of 12,000.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #121
Also, have to say, 53% hardly points to overwhelming outrage.

If the majority of Who fans were outraged I would have expected that vote to be much closer to 75% and above.

That is also just 400 odd votes. The poll was 12,000.
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #122
Otis said:
Also, have to say, 53% hardly points to overwhelming outrage.

If the majority of Who fans were outraged I would have expected that vote to be much closer to 75% and above.
Click to expand...

The comments after the poll suggested that it was those who had watched the programme most regularly who were most hostile.

It's dead anyway, more people watched a repeat of Pointless Celebrities which cost the BBC nothing to make than watched most of Series 10.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #123
dutchman said:
The comments after the poll suggested that it was those who had watched the programme most regularly who were most hostile.

It's dead anyway, more people watched a repeat of Pointless Celebrities which cost the BBC nothing to make than watched most of Series 10.
Click to expand...
New series will bring in new fans. I am convinced of it and has already been said, people watch in so many different ways these days.
Long way from dead to my mind and I bet if we have this same conversation in 10 years time it will still be going strong then too. It is such an adaptable show, with few constraints.
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #124
Otis said:
New series will bring in new fans.
Click to expand...

Of course it will, but they won't be the kind who stick with the show just as they didn't stick with Series 10 and there won't be enough new new fans to compensate for the vast number of veteran fans who've abandoned the show.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #125
dutchman said:
there won't be enough new new fans to compensate for the vast number of veteran fans who've abandoned the show.
Click to expand...
A portion of the first lot of fans'll be pretty dead or senile by now.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #126
dutchman said:
Of course it will, but they won't be the kind who stick with the show just as they didn't stick with Series 10 and there won't be enough new new fans to compensate for the vast number of veteran fans who've abandoned the show.
Click to expand...

That is of course just your opinion and not fact, dutchman.

I beg to differ. If Jodie Whittaker is really good there might well be a whole new following and who knows if they will stick with it or not. Pure conjecture.

Because of the format and because it is time travel and because the Doctor can be anything and go anywhere, there is plenty of mileage left in the show. That's what I believe anyway.
 
Reactions: chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #127
The drop in merchandise you're referring to is presumably from last years BBC Worldwide Annual Report. That report covers a period that was part of the 15 month gap between series 9 and 10. In news that will shock nobody merchandise sales are lower when the show isn't on TV.

BBC don't even use the ratings anyway, they use Live + 7 as most industry people and Doctor Who adds considerably more viewers through that (averaged around an extra 3.5m per episode for series 9) than other shows. Basically TV viewing habits are changing, people don't watch live so ratings drop but those who aren't watching Doctor Who live are watching it on time shift in far greater numbers than other shows.

Its not going anywhere soon. In an unprecedented move the BBC has already sold up to series 15 overseas meaning at least 5 more series.
 
Reactions: RegTheDonk and Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #128
Well said that man and if anyone wants proof to its longevity, I will gladly stick them in the TARDIS and take them 10 years into the future to prove my point.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #129
Why do people say she is a "fantastic actress" based on what? Her and the bloke who played her husband in Broadchurch reminded me of a furniture removal sale they were so wooden.

Why does she say she's a feminist and a woman? She's hardly Emily Davidson is she? Also if she's a feminist first why take the role as its only been made to be a woman so the flagging franchise gets interest. That's hardly feminism more opportinism.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #130
Grendel said:
Why do people say she is a "fantastic actress" based on what? Her and the bloke who played her husband in Broadchurch reminded me of a furniture removal sale they were so wooden.

Why does she say she's a feminist and a woman? She's hardly Emily Davidson is she? Also if she's a feminist first why take the role as its only been made to be a woman so the flagging franchise gets interest. That's hardly feminism more opportinism.
Click to expand...


All a matter of opinion.

I thought she was fantastic in the first series of Broadchurch and knew her before then from Attack the Block.

A very good actress I would say. Never seen her handle comedy though, so that will be interesting.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 24, 2017
  • #131
dutchman said:
The comments after the poll suggested that it was those who had watched the programme most regularly who were most hostile.
Click to expand...

Interesting this from Stephen Moffatt.

Moffat said. "There has been no backlash at all. The story of the moment is that the notionally conservative Doctor Who fandom has utterly embraced that change completely. Eighty-percent approval on social media, not that I check these things obsessively. So many people wanting to pretend there is a problem. There isn't.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #132
Otis said:
All a matter of opinion.

I thought she was fantastic in the first series of Broadchurch and knew her before then from Attack the Block.

A very good actress I would say. Never seen her handle comedy though, so that will be interesting.
Click to expand...

Anyone watch her in Trust Me last night on BBC1? Thought she was very impressive myself and all the reviews I have seen have praised her for her performance in it.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #133
Otis said:
Anyone watch her in Trust Me last night on BBC1? Thought she was very impressive myself and all the reviews I have seen have praised her for her performance in it.
Click to expand...
I did watch it Otis but I don't really see where the plot can go.
Unless it's only a two parter.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #134
wingy said:
I did watch it Otis but I don't really see where the plot can go.
Unless it's only a two parter.
Click to expand...
4 parts.

It's moving at quite a pace isn't it!! I really liked it, but it is all rather fantastical. Somehow the film makers made it look quite gripping.

Whittaker is very good in it though.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #135
Otis said:
4 parts.

It's moving at quite a pace isn't it!! I really liked it, but it is all rather fantastical. Somehow the film makers made it look quite gripping.

Whittaker is very good in it though.
Click to expand...
Yeah not bad, just don't see where it can go.
She cheats, she gets found out, then punishment?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #136
wingy said:
Yeah not bad, just don't see where it can go.
She cheats, she gets found out, then punishment?
Click to expand...
Ooh, I like the sound of that.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #137
Otis said:
Anyone watch her in Trust Me last night on BBC1? Thought she was very impressive myself and all the reviews I have seen have praised her for her performance in it.
Click to expand...

She's a typical bang average actress to be honest. She will be on strictly come dancing soon.
 
Reactions: dutchman

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #138
Grendel said:
She's a typical bang average actress to be honest. She will be on strictly come dancing soon.
Click to expand...
Well the critics seem to disagree with you on this.

Got a lot of plaudits and I would say she carries the show.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #139
I am no film/tv buff - but I know people who seem 'affected' at all this kind of thing. They ask me if I am going to see film A...'no...should I?' Well yes they indicate - because actor B is in it...'who is he/she?' Oh come on, you must've seen film C...he/she was in that...'erm...no not seen it'

Does the actors in a film/program or show REALLY reliably reflect on how good or bad something will be? I tend to look at the theme or plot more than anything else, then watch or not, & enjoy or not.
Keep it simple because the eis so much good/bad shit out there it is impossible to keep up. There was a time so.ebody would recommend stuff - I would watch & be disappointed.
All about personal taste & opinion.

Let the Dr be...enjoy or or don't watch it & whichever the case just get on with it

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 9, 2017
  • #140
SkyblueBazza said:
I am no film/tv buff - but I know people who seem 'affected' at all this kind of thing. They ask me if I am going to see film A...'no...should I?' Well yes they indicate - because actor B is in it...'who is he/she?' Oh come on, you must've seen film C...he/she was in that...'erm...no not seen it'

Does the actors in a film/program or show REALLY reliably reflect on how good or bad something will be? I tend to look at the theme or plot more than anything else, then watch or not, & enjoy or not.
Keep it simple because the eis so much good/bad shit out there it is impossible to keep up. There was a time so.ebody would recommend stuff - I would watch & be disappointed.
All about personal taste & opinion.

Let the Dr be...enjoy or or don't watch it & whichever the case just get on with it

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Yeah, get your point, but I specifically watched this show last night BECAUSE Jodie Whittaker was in it and I liked her in Broadchurch and in Attack the Block.

Sometimes you can just watch an actor in anything and everything they do because you like their style of acting. I have always been the same.

All old actors, but I could watch anything with Cary Grant in and also James Stewart and Humphrey Bogart. Same too with Al Pacino and nowadays, Amy Adams and Kevin Spacey and Idris Elba.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 4 of 7 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?