It is indeed true the ball was outside the quadrant, but that doesnt excuse the defence from not attempting to defendTheir goal should not have been allowed. Ball was well outside corner quadrant and nearer goal by almost a foot. Officials were dire again today.
Every team does it nowadays, pointless having the ruleTheir goal should not have been allowed. Ball was well outside corner quadrant and nearer goal by almost a foot. Officials were dire again today.
Dropping Phillips did actually correspond with our demise, obviously not the only reason but I didn't think he deserved being bombed out like that !Where's the Phillips haters today?
Arron Phillips was excellent today I thought, more composed and got forward well without any help in front of him from a right midfielder.
RCC..... Produced the goods again.
Every team does it nowadays, pointless having the rule
And/or throw ins.Annoys me, why doesn't the lino check and just say to the player its got to be in the right place. Some refs get so fussy about where you take a free kick of throw from but don't bother with corners.
Every team does it nowadays, pointless having the rule
Often lino's do check, for example the lino in the Liverpool game picked up milner for it a few times. But corner was opposite side today to the lino so not his duty obviously.Annoys me, why doesn't the lino check and just say to the player its got to be in the right place. Some refs get so fussy about where you take a free kick of throw from but don't bother with corners.
Paxman, I applaud the optimism but every single time you post the complete opposite happens.
Agreed.The ball doesn't need to be touching the line to be classed as in the quadrant. Just to be sure you're sure.
Just seen it, not the best angle but I'd wager it's a legit corner.
Like this, if the line here was the corner quadrant this would be a legitimate corner.
Agreed.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Gillingham have a tough run in if we win Tues night is 6 th place still up for grabs?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Fair enough, but TV angle it looks in. And like you say we still didn't deal with the cross anyway.I was sitting in that corner , and to me and othes round me it was clearly outside by a good foot
not complaining about the goal tho.
Given that we played against 10 men for over an hour we only managed 4 shots on target and 57% possession, and force 4 corners to their 8.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
It's dongo.
Edit: To be fair I didn't go or even listen to it as I'm in work. But it's dongo.
What!!! We were a goal down????
Grendel said we never had a single chance before the sending off
We had a goal disallowed!!
You didn't mention the 18 shots off target and the disallowed goal before the sending off Stu
You like stats but as usual only present half of them.
I can't remember 18 off target shots?We didn't have 18 shots off target.
And the latter part of your post, oh the irony.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
We didn't,I can't remember 18 off target shots?
I thought we played quite well yesterday and deserved the win overall. Don't know why we can't just leave it at that.
I always find it amusing when people use a 'shots on target' stat to prove a point. As though the number of times you chip the ball into the keepers arms from 30 yards is somehow more indicative how well you have played than the number of times you head it wide from 6 yards.
I thought we played quite well yesterday and deserved the win overall. Don't know why we can't just leave it at that.
I can't remember 18 off target shots?
I thought we played quite well yesterday and deserved the win overall. Don't know why we can't just leave it at that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?