Evo1883
Well-Known Member
Why cross the channel via criminal activity if you have a legitimate claim to asylum ? Just come normally?
Why cross the channel via criminal activity if you have a legitimate claim to asylum ? Just come normally?Who says they’re illegal? If they have a legitimate claim to asylum they’re acting perfectly within international law.
They have many reasons for coming here. From speak the language to they already have family and/or friends here to unite with.They're in France clint mate , a developed democratic peaceful country..
Go about it the correct way , as stated by Brighton , and don't risk your kids lives on a dingy in the middle of the channel.
Anyway , Britain is shit , why come here .. stay in the EU where they will prosper even more
UK ranks 14th across Europe for the number of asylum applications per capita
Well if we revert to COVs argument , he stated that we are taking in less every year ?
Either way , the argument about mainland Europe taking in more migrants is quite obvious isn't it .. a huge body of land joined together with open borders ..
It's far easier to travel to and settle in mainland Europe, added ro the fact much of it Is alot closer to the middle east .
As stated , there are many reasons for this.. why are people so keen to just keep loading these islands with people ... it's frankly weird and definitely not an election winner ...so you know
As stated , there are many reasons for this.. why are people so keen to just keep loading these islands with people ... it's frankly weird and definitely not an election winner ...so you know
So is your argument we shouldn't take any and the EU should or are you asking for a solution?
Because if its the latter the only way is to stop people fleeing in the first place.
Funnily enough, the party responsible for the current situation have been in office for 11 years and have an 80 seat majority so either it is a vote winner or the electorate didn't know what they were voting for.
Clint , it's a tedious old argument.
Take some fair enough , take more or you're a nasty bastard ... it's never enough for people like you , Tony unless we just continuously let people in , doest matter how many ... because feelings
What’s normally? Our government doesn’t offer them a legitimate route to claim asylum here except for the odd exception like the recent withdrawal from Afghanistan. The only way they can claim asylum is to be here, there really is only one option to the people arriving by boat and that’s arrive by boat so they can claim asylum.Why cross the channel via criminal activity if you have a legitimate claim to asylum ? Just come normally?
What’s normally? Our government doesn’t offer them a legitimate route to claim asylum here except for the odd exception like the recent withdrawal from Afghanistan. The only way they can claim asylum is to be here, there really is only one option to the people arriving by boat and that’s arrive by boat so they can claim asylum.
Send the navy over .. sail them across.. you can meet them with crisps and blankets .
Problem solved
Hahahahhaa clint if you had your way you'd have them all , so why you moaning at all mateI didn't vote for this. Tories and Brexiteers did, own it.
Hahahahhaa clint if you had your way you'd have them all , so why you moaning at all mate
Don't start conflicts in Sovereign states that misplace millions of people.
Problem solved.
No, see my other posts, if I had my way Iraqis, Afghans, Lybians and Syrians would have any need to be fleeing confli to and would stay home.
Don’t forget the hot chocolates.Send the navy over .. sail them across.. you can meet them with crisps and blankets .
Problem solved
No need for parents to put their kids lives at risk , no need to spend several thousand pound on a dingy trip.
Let's take them all and save the heartache
Did we actually start the Syrian conflict ? Did we start the afghan conflict or was that started for them ?
Behave
Absolutely ... put the whole nations council tax up first though .. to pay for it ofcourseDon’t forget the hot chocolates.
Let’s take them all on one condition. They all get a free house, free car and a wide screen TV.
We went into Afghanistan originally after 9/11, quite bizarrely.
We should never have got involved in Syria (we being the west not specifically the uk). Of course its to do with western and Russian proxies but still, Western foreign policy has been a disaster.
Don’t be silly. That money is already earmarked for government cronies.Absolutely ... put the whole nations council tax up first though .. to pay for it ofcourse
Iraq I can give you , WMD no chance .. let's not make out he wasn't killing thousands of his own people anyway . you'd have also moaned if we did nothing about that
We shouldn't have installed him in the first place.
And no, we shouldn't have interfered, as bad as he was. There's plenty of worse dictators we've left alone.
I haven't always thought this but that's because I listened to Christopher Hitchens thoughts onthe matter but I now think he was wrong.
Don’t be silly. That money is already earmarked for government cronies.
There is , but people generally are not happy when we do nothing are they ? They are also equally unhappy when we do ?
Lose lose
They' re booking hotels independently of local councils,who are in the court's trying to stop this I believe.Absolutely ... put the whole nations council tax up first though .. to pay for it ofcourse
Fuck me, when Norwich is underwater are we going to have to take Chris Sutton and the big eared boys on farms? What a future.And people displaced by conflict will be a drop in the ocean compared to people displaced by climate change in the next few decades. Things aren't going to get better.
I don’t think anyone is saying that this should be policy to be encouraging people to risk their lives, more that if you’re gonna stop it you need to understand the bigger picture as to why it’s happening, that then takes you to working out what they’re fleeing and why.. and the answers to that are uncomfortable for us.
Because you're desperate, and somebody offers you a way out.Why cross the channel via criminal activity if you have a legitimate claim to asylum ? Just come normally?
Let’s not forget that despite what the media like to push, Britain is definitely not a soft touch.Because you're desperate, and somebody offers you a way out.
What we should always remember, is that desperate people should always be allowed the chance to say why they should be allowed to stay in this country. That's never the issue. The argument should always be where we set the bar for accepting they should stay, and what we do with the ones that we decide shouldn't. The right to ask for help should never be questioned.Let’s not forget that despite what the media like to push, Britain is definitely not a soft touch.
As stated , there are many reasons for this.. why are people so keen to just keep loading these islands with people ... it's frankly weird and definitely not an election winner ...so you know
Now that's hilarious .Next you'll be saying that France is an underdeveloped European nation that fails to reach the required standard of living for these poor souls.They have many reasons for coming here. From speak the language to they already have family and/or friends here to unite with.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?