Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Meeting with Joy Seppala & Dave Boddy - Thursday 27th February 2020 (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mark82
  • Start date Mar 3, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • …
  • 34
Next
First Prev 14 of 34 Next Last

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #456
Liquid Gold said:
Has anybody contracted sports journalists. Places like the Athletic and Mundial that really like to look into fan culture and not just the game itself? They might be interested in how a bunch of weirdos on a forum have managed to do more than all the local media combined?

Let me know if not and I will start looking at places to send things to tomorrow.
Click to expand...

Not had chance to even think of anything like that yet. If you have any contacts feel free to reach out (or drop me a PM with details).
 
Last edited: Mar 4, 2020
Reactions: torchomatic and PurpleBin

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #457
mark82 said:
Not had chance to tmeven think of anything like that yet. If you have any contacts feel free to reach out (or drop me a PM with details).
Click to expand...
No contacts at all, was just going to chance my arm by sending stuff through.
 
Reactions: mark82

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #458
The coventrian said:
I think they do. Its sisu they hate. I imagine if there was a change of ownership then the councils tune would change.
Click to expand...

Damage has been done now though, regardless of ownership, and irrespective of who shoulders the blame. Frankly, they all need to work together to find acceptable short and long term solutions for CCFC.
 
Reactions: SBQuin and usskyblue

CanadianCCFC

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #459
The coventrian said:
Joy's cares about ccfc,new stadium lol. Oh dear. Gullible as fuck.
Click to expand...
Uh pretty sure Mark just posted what was said in the meeting rather than a running commentary of his opinion
 
Reactions: robbiethemole, RegTheDonk, torchomatic and 2 others

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #460
Gint11 said:
Quick one guys, might be said but I’ve not read the full thread. When talking about a 4 sided stadium was there any talk of the building design being anything like how Highfield road was? Such as having a west terrace type area etc?

I’d fucking love a modern day Highfield rd!!
Click to expand...

why, when they've made no progress on actually building a ground have they ripped up the initial bowl design and changed it to a 4 sided stadium?
It sounds like absolute bollocks to me. I really wish they wouldn't mention the stadium, it just detracts from other issues, (I appreciate Pete and Mark probably asked them the question).
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849 and ccfctommy

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #461
This all needs to be taken one step at a time. Priority is get us back to Coventry next season. Then let’s see about a new stadium or long term rental deal.

unless Richardson and Joy get in the same room to talk there will be no movement. They are the decision makers.
 
Reactions: MusicDating, covcity4life, Sky Blue Pete and 2 others

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #462
mark82 said:
Not had chance to even think of anything like that yet. If you have any contacts feel free to reach out (or drop me a PM with details).
Click to expand...
Said on a previous post, Rob Dorsett at Sky. He's on twitter. He did the interview with sepalla and covered the McCallum story too.
 

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #463
Sky Blue Pete said:
I genuinely think there’s a story there look at Peterborough and you could add Swansea and Watford and Brighton too. Are we so flush with cash that we can pass up upwards of £10m economic impact for the sake of some bruised egos?
Click to expand...
Perhaps you could get a quote from the owner of Dhillons brewery or see if he would be able to come along. An actual local business owner directly affected by the club being out of the city losing out on the money that would bring might have a few words for Duggins
 
Reactions: covcity4life and mr_monkey
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #464
clint van damme said:
why, when they've made no progress on actually building a ground have they ripped up the initial bowl design and changed it to a 4 sided stadium?
It sounds like absolute bollocks to me. I really wish they wouldn't mention the stadium, it just detracts from other issues, (I appreciate Pete and Mark probably asked them the question).
Click to expand...
It's also the biggest piece of evidence about not believing them in anything else atm.

Brighton had to go through numerous appeals, but at least you saw something happening! As soon as the foundation stone's laid I'm right behind them, but in terms of credibility they have zero on this issue.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and clint van damme

Skybluemichael

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #465
shepardo01 said:
Said on a previous post, Rob Dorsett at Sky. He's on twitter. He did the interview with sepalla and covered the McCallum story too.
Click to expand...
Did we ever get all that sky interview with joy? Only got 5min clip from an hour interview
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #466
The coventrian said:
Havent a scooby tbh. It's all make believe so probably never!
Click to expand...
Ok that doesn’t really make sense given what you’ve been saying. I think a month is long enough to ask about progress.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #467
The coventrian said:
I think they do. Its sisu they hate. I imagine if there was a change of ownership then the councils tune would change.
Click to expand...
I think that’s true and possibly not Sisu but joy seppalla. I am trying to understand why other councils work with major institutions as they recognise the economic impact
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #468
clint van damme said:
why, when they've made no progress on actually building a ground have they ripped up the initial bowl design and changed it to a 4 sided stadium?
It sounds like absolute bollocks to me. I really wish they wouldn't mention the stadium, it just detracts from other issues, (I appreciate Pete and Mark probably asked them the question).
Click to expand...

I think, firstly, a change of personnel with different ideas. Secondly, and it seems to make sense, a 4 sided design is easier to expand later on if/when they want to increase capacity, by going upwards or filling in the corners.

All I can say is that they seemed genuine in the reasons they want to build a stadium. The skepticism is healthy and understandable with what's happened in the past.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #469
Skybluefaz said:
Perhaps you could get a quote from the owner of Dhillons brewery or see if he would be able to come along. An actual local business owner directly affected by the club being out of the city losing out on the money that would bring might have a few words for Duggins
Click to expand...

It's a good idea.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #470
Sky Blue Pete said:
Absolutely and you’ll notice we did start that conversation. If there’s no progress we can ask again. How long should we wait before asking on progress my friend?
Click to expand...

Well clearly six and a half years isn’t long enough. How long were you thinking? A nice round decade perhaps?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #471
mark82 said:
It's a good idea.
Click to expand...

Right. Meet Sisu “be nice, keep it secret, I sure do love this stadium design Joy. Yes that legal action is your right Joy”. Meet the other parties “get questions from the forum, invite the media, bring along witnesses”. But both sides right guys? No fear or favour?
 
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #472
Deleted member 5849 said:
It's also the biggest piece of evidence about not believing them in anything else atm.

Brighton had to go through numerous appeals, but at least you saw something happening! As soon as the foundation stone's laid I'm right behind them, but in terms of credibility they have zero on this issue.
Click to expand...

Look at it the other way round though. Put aside the history on this issue and also the scepticism and assume for one minute that they are serious this time. Why then, right now, would they be making announcements, submitting planning applications, when it is quite clear that we would first need to return to the Ricoh for a period of time? That would only weaken their position. "What's the point letting them back, they're going in a few years anyway...".

I would be amazed if they started doing that right now, you would surely keep those cards very close to your chest until the point that you have secured the 5 year deal. That's assuming they're serious, we all have a view on that and I'm playing devil's advocate, but if they are then no way would I expect them to lay out the plans in detail at this time. Keeping a lid on it right now is entirely sensible and it is pointless pushing for answers.
 
Reactions: SBQuin
P

PurpleBin

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #473
Could they build a stadium on the border so covered by Nuneaton Council or Rugby Council?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #474
theferret said:
Look at it the other way round though. Put aside the history on this issue and also the scepticism and assume for one minute that they are serious this time. Why then, right now, would they be making announcements, submitting planning applications, when it is quite clear that we would first need to return to the Ricoh for a period of time? That would only weaken their position. "What's the point letting them back, they're going in a few years anyway...".

I would be amazed if they started doing that right now, you would surely keep those cards very close to your chest until the point that you have secured the 5 year deal. That's assuming they're serious, we all have a view on that and I'm playing devil's advocate, but if they are then no way would I expect them to lay out the plans in detail at this time. Keeping a lid on it right now is entirely sensible and it is pointless pushing for answers.
Click to expand...
They've already said they're going in a few years, anyway.

As they did before.

And before that.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #475
Deleted member 5849 said:
They've already said they're going in a few years, anyway.

As they did before.

And before that.
Click to expand...

Sorry NW the mob has spoken! We’re getting a new stadium and it’ll be old fashioned with standing and a pub for every fan and us lazy slobs will get cushy jobs. And the only reason it looks like it’s not been happening for six and a half years is Joy is a tactical genius outsmarting the evil council. And we must never question that, or at least not now because reasons it’s different this time.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #476
PurpleBin said:
Could they build a stadium on the border so covered by Nuneaton Council or Rugby Council?
Click to expand...

Land isn’t free in Nuneaton or Rugby. The sticking point is the price of land according to Sisu. And Sisu refuse to use an intermediary because reasons.
 
H

Happy_Martian

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #477
chiefdave said:
If the Telegraph or CWR had anything about them it would be the leading story tomorrow morning. We all know the reality is it most likely won't even get a mention.
Click to expand...

Well, this has got into the CT. But a pathetic copy/paste job of the feedback by Mark and Pete.

https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/football-news/coventry-city-ricoh-arena-sisu-17854243

Wonder if @mark82 or @Sky Blue Pete gave them permission to rip their comments and use them for monetary gain ? This was a clickbait ad I saw on FB.
 
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #478
Deleted member 5849 said:
They've already said they're going in a few years, anyway.

As they did before.

And before that.
Click to expand...

So what, so they've cried wolf. The point is, nobody believes it, they probably realise that. Working on the slim chance that they intend to follow through this time, identifying a site and submitting a detailed planning application at this time possibly wouldn't be helpful in the Ricoh negotiations.

My point in this. There are two possibilities. One it is a complete bluff. Two, it is serious. Either way, we're not going to get any details at this time, either because there aren't any, or because it is not the right time to go public. So why do people endlessly question them on it and call for answers? We're not going to get any, so we should just forget about it. Return to the Ricoh on a time-limited deal and then we should demand answers, but until then there is no point.
 
Reactions: Iancro

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #479
shmmeee said:
Sorry NW the mob has spoken! We’re getting a new stadium and it’ll be old fashioned with standing and a pub for every fan and us lazy slobs will get cushy jobs. And the only reason it looks like it’s not been happening for six and a half years is Joy is a tactical genius outsmarting the evil council. And we must never question that, or at least not now because reasons it’s different this time.
Click to expand...

the council are evil! And Duggins comments are a disgrace, another one who's let his hatred of sisu morph into a hatred of CCFC.
His love of wasps shows him up for not just being an absolute wanker, but a hypocritical wanker.
 
Reactions: Moff, win9nut, covcity4life and 2 others
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #480
shmmeee said:
Sorry NW the mob has spoken! We’re getting a new stadium and it’ll be old fashioned with standing and a pub for every fan and us lazy slobs will get cushy jobs. And the only reason it looks like it’s not been happening for six and a half years is Joy is a tactical genius outsmarting the evil council. And we must never question that, or at least not now because reasons it’s different this time.
Click to expand...
You see I wouldn't go that far. I'm happy to discuss a new stadium, I'd love a new one, and I'd be happy to press them towards one.

In the timescales they're talking, however, we could already have one, and not need to be having these conversations full stop!

I'd see a new stadium as our next owner's priority, and this lot just make it look farcical!

That being said (again), lay the foundation stone and I'm there.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete, covcity4life, GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee and 1 other person

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #481
shmmeee said:
Right. Meet Sisu “be nice, keep it secret, I sure do love this stadium design Joy. Yes that legal action is your right Joy”. Meet the other parties “get questions from the forum, invite the media, bring along witnesses”. But both sides right guys? No fear or favour?
Click to expand...
Here we go, we get that sisu weren't scrutinised to your standard, I don't disagree with some of what you say. Doesn't mean that the council and Wasps get off the hook though does it?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #482
theferret said:
So why do people endlessly question them on it and call for answers?
Click to expand...
Because they insist on endlessly repeating this charade.
 

eastwoodsdustman

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #483
shmmeee said:
Sorry NW the mob has spoken! We’re getting a new stadium and it’ll be old fashioned with standing and a pub for every fan and us lazy slobs will get cushy jobs. And the only reason it looks like it’s not been happening for six and a half years is Joy is a tactical genius outsmarting the evil council. And we must never question that, or at least not now because reasons it’s different this time.
Click to expand...
Seriously mate. I’d give it a rest for a bit. You started off questioning which is great but You’re looking more and more desperate with every post now.
 
Reactions: win9nut, Liquid Gold, torchomatic and 4 others

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #484
theferret said:
So what, so they've cried wolf. The point is, nobody believes it, they probably realise that. Working on the slim chance that they intend to follow through this time, identifying a site and submitting a detailed planning application at this time possibly wouldn't be helpful in the Ricoh negotiations.

My point in this. There are two possibilities. One it is a complete bluff. Two, it is serious. Either way, we're not going to get any details at this time, either because there aren't any, or because it is not the right time to go public. So why do people endlessly question them on it and call for answers? We're not going to get any, so we should just forget about it. Return to the Ricoh on a time-limited deal and then we should demand answers, but until then there is no point.
Click to expand...

but why not just not mention it.
They've probably got more goodwill (not sure if that's the right expression), than at any time for a long time.
The whole EC complaint issue has started people looking at the role of others in this whole mess. People who never went to Sixfields are going to St. Andrews because they feel this situation isn't entirely down to the owners, why try and milk that further with even more new ground bollocks.
Just leave it for now, concentrate on supporting the Manager (which in fairness they appear to be doing), and getting back to Cov. If something concrete happen regarding a new ground then shout it from the rooftops but until then.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849, Senior Vick from Alicante and Skybluefaz
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #485
Deleted member 5849 said:
Because they insist on endlessly repeating this charade.
Click to expand...

But only when they are asked the question really.

I'm like you, I'll believe it when I see it, and would very much welcome it tbh. I get a sense, just a sense, that they are perhaps seriously exploring the option this time. MR does not strike me as someone who suffer's fools or who is willing to be a stooge. He seems fairly convinced by what he has been told privately. I just sense there is a little more meat on the bones this time. Time will tell though.
 
Reactions: mark82

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #486
Sky Blue Pete said:
Gonna meet with Cllr Duggins he would like to leave me in no uncertain terms what he is saying as I don’t seem to understand
Click to expand...
He's spoken out of turn and is bricking it he'll be quoted in the press.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #487
ccfclinney said:
My biggest question is how is the new stadium going to be funded and who will own it ? Sisu or Coventry city football club..
Click to expand...

Not this again! SISU would own it, but they would have something to sell to a prospective buyer. Look at how many grounds are actually owned by football clubs nowadays.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #488
theferret said:
But only when they are asked the question really.

I'm like you, I'll believe when I see it, and would very much welcome it tbh. I get a sense, just a sense, that they are perhaps seriously exploring the option this time. MR does not strike me as someone who suffer's fools or who is willing to be a stooge. He seems fairly convinced by what he has been told privately. I just sense there is a little more meat on the bones this time. Time will tell though.
Click to expand...
I suspect however that Joy Seppala is successful in her chosen line of work because she's a great saleswoman.

Pressley also was convinced, and I don't think it reflects poorly on either of them that they were / are tbh.

But our current evidence is not to believe a word!

Which then means, why believe anything?

They're their own worst enemies in terms of gaining credibility.
 
C

covboy1987

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #489
mark82 said:
Stadium Plans – Short & Long Term

Dave & Joy both seemed hopeful that a deal could be reached with Wasps for us to play at the Ricoh Arena next year, whether promoted or not. Bringing the club back to Coventry remains a priority, and he believes it is also important to Wasps to have the added revenue from CCFC being there.

We questioned whether the quality of the pitch at the Ricoh Arena would form part of those negotiations, as it was acknowledged by all parties that the improved playing surface at St. Andrew’s had contributed to the quality of football on offer this year. Dave confirmed that the pitch would form part of the negotiations and would be high up the priority list.

Owning our stadium, and associated revenue streams, remains the longer-term goal. For this reason, the aim is to look to agree a sustainable deal to allow us to play at the Ricoh Arena for 5 years whilst work is ongoing. If a deal cannot be reached with Wasps to play at the Ricoh Arena, then we do have agreement from the EFL to remain at Birmingham for a further 2 seasons beyond this season. Naturally they would like to start selling season tickets from March, but they cannot do this until we know where we will be playing.

As previously communicated, the search for stadium sites is ongoing and has been narrowed down to a shortlist of 6 sites. A further site has also recently been identified. Although all sites are suitable for a stadium, the new site is considered the ideal location. As the exact location of the sites is commercially sensitive, they couldn’t tell us where the sites were, however, it was confirmed that all sites on the shortlist have been approved by the EFL for their proximity to St Mary’s Guildhall in Coventry, which is a marker point for the EFL.

Joy confirmed she can see the potential in the fan base for bigger crowds. Both Joy & Dave thought that crowds would have been in the region of 15 – 18k for some of the bigger games this season (such as Rotherham & Sunderland) at the Ricoh Arena. For this reason, when looking at sites and designs for Stadiums they have this figure in mind as a minimum. The potential new stadium would possibly be a 4-sided design rather than a bowl (similar to the design of Shrewsbury’s new stadium) as this allowed greater scope for future expansion. Current thinking is that new stadium would be 18-20k, expandable to somewhere in the region of 30k.

Development of Relationship with Fans

Dave advised that regular supporters forum meetings were still held which included representatives from 15 different supporters’ groups including the London supporters’ group, Leamington & Warwick Supporters group and the Sky Blues Trust, amongst others. Dave advised there is a place for Sky Blues Talk on that forum and has invited Pete to take that place. The supporters’ forum has met twice this season, and another meeting is due soon. The group is chaired by Colin Henderson of the London supporters’ group. Dave advised he’d written to local media outlet’s requesting they use Colin as the point of contact as a fans voice, but they so far haven’t done so.

We spoke briefly about their relationship with the Sky Blues Trust. Dave advised they don’t give them any preferential treatment over any other fan group, as they consider them one of many and confirmed they are part of the supporters’ forum. They consider the trust as quite militant in their approach, and this was evident at a recent supporters’ forum meeting where they seemed to be pulling in the opposite direction to all other groups. They don’t consider the trust as representative of the whole of the fan base, and question the number of ‘active’ members they have. They do see there are some members of the Trust board who do want to do the right thing, and if there was a change in leadership and direction at the Trust they could play a key part at what is a really important time for CCFC, giving the fans a voice, raising the profile of the club and helping get the club back to Coventry.

CCFC Season Ticket Fund

Mark gave figures to Joy and Dave of the amount of money raised last season for the CCFC Season Ticket Fund Charity arranged by Simon Miller (@Mild-Mannered Janitor), which had helped buy over 150 season tickets for fans who were unable to do so, either through individual nominations or via local charities. Joy & Dave were taken back by the amount raised and the generosity of fans.

Mark thanked Dave & Joy (and all at the club) for their help and support with this last year, including matching tickets bought by the fund one-for-one with tickets purchased by the club which contributed greatly to the success.

Mark confirmed that plans are in place for the same fundraising to be run this year with some funds held over from last year to contribute to this. The club again agreed they will match tickets purchased through the fund on a one-for-one basis. On top of this Dave offered to put us in touch with David Busst and Sky Blues in the Community, as they may be able to assist with identifying worthy causes.

Dave also asked Mark to send over figures & details to him and Mark Hornby who will look to compile a story on last year’s efforts to put on the club’s official website.

Joy commented she’s proud the to be associated with such a wonderful cause, it’s football at its best within the community – seeking to support others who need it. Joy & Dave advised they have received comments and letters from recipients on how important it has been for them – it really does make a difference to people.
Click to expand...
Well done guys - first steps in bringing the fans and owners togther very importent
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 4, 2020
  • #490
clint van damme said:
the council are evil! And Duggins comments are a disgrace, another one who's let his hatred of sisu morph into a hatred of CCFC.
His love of wasps shows him up for not just being an absolute wanker, but a hypocritical wanker.
Click to expand...

Right. Every single elected representative of the council, of all parties, are evil. And this is not at all letting hatred cloud your judgement.

Duggins is a twat. So is Joy. What’s your point?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • …
  • 34
Next
First Prev 14 of 34 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?