Actually forgive me anyone can but dpp can take it over at any time
Pure theatre from Farage and the boys
Yes DPP can take it over at any time, however if they do at least Farage will have got it moving.Actually forgive me anyone can but dpp can take it over at any time
Pure theatre from Farage and the boys
He can, as I think you have said yourself.He can’t
Farage appears to be claiming he has information that isn't in the public domain that he is somehow being blocked from revealing which leads to the question, is Farage the only MP to whom parliamentary privilege doesn't apply?So after 4 months with no charges being laid by our two tier justice (I use the word loosely) system, Farage is going to bring a private prosecution against the thugs who broke a WPC nose and assaulted other armed police officers. All caught on camera, of course. Plenty of evidence you might have thought.
Doesn’t parliamentary privilege only apply to things said in the house? And even then I think there are some rules.Farage appears to be claiming he has information that isn't in the public domain that he is somehow being blocked from revealing which leads to the question, is Farage the only MP to whom parliamentary privilege doesn't apply?
Doesn’t parliamentary privilege only apply to things said in the house? And even then I think there are some rules.
you may have forgotten given how little time he spends doing his job but he's an MP now so not difficult for him to do thatDoesn’t parliamentary privilege only apply to things said in the house? And even then I think there are some rules.
I’m not sure you can call someone a liar in the House of Commons, even if true.Unless he’s about to leak national security secrets or commit a crime I think he’s OK.
I’m not sure you can call someone a liar in the House of Commons, even if true.
I did think it a little pot, kettle, black when Starmer challenged Farage about how much time he has been abroad given the amount of time Starmer seems to be spending on foreign soil.you may have forgotten given how little time he spends doing his job but he's an MP now so not difficult for him to do that
I did think it a little pot, kettle, black when Starmer challenged Farage about how much time he has been abroad given the amount of time Starmer seems to be spending on foreign soil.
You cant directly say someone is lying, a euphemism is acceptable.You absolute can. Protection from defamation law is the entire point.
Sadly yes. He does seem to have been overseas a lot though. The latest was taking 470 delegates to a not fit for purpose COP. I thought it pretty poor that he wasn't here for the first Remembrance Day as Prime Minister.Starmer is Prime Minister Malc.
You cant directly say someone is lying, a euphemism is acceptable.
Sadly yes. He does seem to have been overseas a lot though. The latest was taking 470 delegates to a not fit for purpose COP. I thought it pretty poor that he wasn't here for the first Remembrance Day as Prime Minister.
Wouldn't this be a useful stick to beat Starmer with or farage if it appears he's scuppered it?Surely it just needs to run its course? Any attempts to accelerate, use parliamentary privilege or other prosecutions, means they are less likely to be convicted due to not being able to get a fair trial.
Surely it just needs to run its course? Any attempts to accelerate, use parliamentary privilege or other prosecutions, means they are less likely to be convicted due to not being able to get a fair trial.
Fuck the rules Farage only wants what’s best
No you’re confusing unparliamentary language which will get you a telling off from the speaker with parliamentary privilege which prevents you from getting sued for defamation. Tom Watson called a bunch of people pedophiles and if he’s done that outside the house he could have been sued as he was wrong. But he couldn’t be and as he wasn’t calling another member a liar it wasn’t unparliamentary language either.
If Farage has information he can stand up in the House of Commons and say it and no one can stop him.
Isn’t that the Southport stabbings, not the Manchester Airport Incident. I wasn’t aware that anyone had been killed in the latter incident!Are you malfunctioning? I know you think you are being funny, but it comes across as being a bit of a wet blanket hunting for likes.
You didn't respond to my post, so I assume you've got nothing reasonable to say about the actual crimes?
Let's say Farage comes out and says what he has heard...
For reference, that seems to be something along the lines of the father of the killer being involved in the genocides in Rwanda, and Kier Starmer personally representing him and fighting for him to stay in the UK.
You really think he thinks he's going to get away with it? Given some of the madness going on at the moment, it isn't really surprising to me that some people are forcing the issue rather than playing themselves into trouble.
Not get a fair trial? It’s not as if there isn’t clear video evidence of them assaulting police officers.Surely it just needs to run its course? Any attempts to accelerate, use parliamentary privilege or other prosecutions, means they are less likely to be convicted due to not being able to get a fair trial.
Isn’t that the Southport standings, not the Manchester Airport. I wasn’t aware that anyone had been killed in the latter incident!
I did comment on the Southport stabbingsI think the two are blending into different threads. That being said, there is some cross over generally.
Recently? On this thread?I did comment on the Southport stabbings
Actually forgive me anyone can but dpp can take it over at any time
Pure theatre from Farage and the boys
There is a public interest and trust issue here, as there was with the rioters.FFS, we're not still banging on about a two tier justice system are we?
Do your own research. The average time it was taking for cases to get to court was 200 days or more back in 2023, and it's got significantly worse since then. There's a vast backlog in the courts and in the CPS case files, and strangely enough that also got considerably worse under the last government.
The only cases that got turned around quickly have been the rioters, which was a government choice to stem widespread disorder.
Everyone else has to grind through the system, no matter how black and white your personal opinion on it is. It's not a fucking conspiracy.
If this particular case upsets you, then that's down to you, but I can't see any evidence that this is being treated differently to any other affray, assault, or assault police officer case that happens in every town, every Saturday night.
Charge to case completion at court - CJS Dashboard
criminal-justice-delivery-data-dashboards.justice.gov.uk
There is a public interest and trust issue here, as there was with the rioters.
The fact that government intervened and accelerated those cases is demonstrable vidence of a two tier ssyatem.
At least a decision on charges could be made.
Isn't the issue that they haven't even been charged, not that it hasn't got to court?FFS, we're not still banging on about a two tier justice system are we?
Do your own research. The average time it was taking for cases to get to court was 200 days or more back in 2023, and it's got significantly worse since then. There's a vast backlog in the courts and in the CPS case files, and strangely enough that also got considerably worse under the last government.
The only cases that got turned around quickly have been the rioters, which was a government choice to stem widespread disorder.
Everyone else has to grind through the system, no matter how black and white your personal opinion on it is. It's not a fucking conspiracy.
If this particular case upsets you, then that's down to you, but I can't see any evidence that this is being treated differently to any other affray, assault, or assault police officer case that happens in every town, every Saturday night.
Charge to case completion at court - CJS Dashboard
criminal-justice-delivery-data-dashboards.justice.gov.uk
Where’s your evidence that It isn’t?It would be a two tier system if the Manchester airport incident was an organised riot. Was it?
The reasons for pushing through the prosecutions on the rioters were quite clearly stated, whether you agree with them or not is moot. Other than that, where's your evidence that the Manchester incident is being treated differently to any other criminal case?
Exactly the point.Isn't the issue that they haven't even been charged, not that it hasn't got to court?
Can you see the difference between the airport and this one?
Man received prison sentence following assault of police officers and hospital staff
Anthony Evans, 58 of no fixed address has been sentenced to 20 weeks behind bars and is required to pay £100 worth of compensation.coventryobserver.co.uk
Where he was charged and sentenced within a couple of months?
What about this one?
On the Southport one to Earlsdon saying one side of the debate wasn’t interested now it was a convert to Islam. I think that’s what he meant and I said it was abhorrent whether it was a Muslim a Christian or an atheistRecently? On this thread?
I can't remember the last terrorist attack in the name of atheismOn the Southport one to Earlsdon saying one side of the debate wasn’t interested now it was a convert to Islam. I think that’s what he meant and I said it was abhorrent whether it was a Muslim a Christian or an atheist
You get the pojnt though how can the stabbing of 3 young girls be worse just cause it was a Muslim that did it?I can't remember the last terrorist attack in the name of atheism
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?