Joe Cole (3 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Astute said:
You forgot to say that Wilson wasn't worth 3m, wouldn't score in the Championship and then certainly wouldn't score in the Prem.
Click to expand...

I never said any of that. I did say that we were right to sell him and a lot of posters who understand football economics and reality far better than you agreed with me.
 
skybluetony176

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Two games in a row? You'd think we were playing top of the table sides - is that the sound of a bandwagon rolling that I can hear?
Click to expand...

Told you before. I never miss a midweek game and not only is Saturday a rare free Saturday for me the ticket is a birthday present from my daughters. Assuming I have your permission to attend that is. I know you're chief of the fan police.
 
idm1975

idm1975

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
I never said any of that. I did say that we were right to sell him and a lot of posters who understand football economics and reality far better than you agreed with me.
Click to expand...
So you say you understand football economics, i guess its just the playing side you have no clue about then
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
idm1975 said:
So you say you understand football economics, i guess its just the playing side you have no clue about then
Click to expand...

Oddly you guess wrong. Seems despite the nonsense I received when I indicated Haynes' shortcomings has now been forgotten.

Grendel is never wrong.
 
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
except aboutt he cracks...aint we unbeaton since then,and unbeaton wel before that loss too?

haynes though i agree,defensivly really really needs to improve
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
The Gentleman said:
Haynes is not a left back, scared to head a football FFS. Might make it as a left wing but simply cannot defend.
Click to expand...
I think it would be good if we could send him on loan to a club who would be willing to play him as a left midfielder.
 
skybluetony176

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
covcity4life said:
except aboutt he cracks...aint we unbeaton since then,and unbeaton wel before that loss too?

haynes though i agree,defensivly really really needs to improve
Click to expand...

Haynes needs to go out for a seasons loan in the conference. People seem to forget how good he looked in the youth set up, jumping up to the first team was to soon for him. He may well have to take a step or two back so he can move forward again. He looks like a player who's lost all confidence in his ability and I can't see him regaining it at this level especially with the added pressure of a promotion push.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
Not sure I understand the level of criticism this lad is receiving currently.
Definitely not the finished article but I can't think of anyone tearing him a new one in this recent run.
I'd say he's been a bonus during this chrisis as has the ability of Stokes in moving over.
The lad looks like he's grown an inch or two and bulked out a bit.
Yes he would have gone on loan for his development had we not suffered the setbacks and from my point of view that would have been their good luck instead of ours.
 
mmttww

mmttww

Well-Known Member
Haynes played well on Tue night. Walsall tore us to pieces down the flanks at their place (Phillips had to go off at HT) and troubled us very little there on Tue apart from a ten min spell before the goal. Haynes is doing enough to keep his place. A bit too hesitant about supporting the attack a couple of times on Tue but his decision making can only get better with games, just like Phillips has improved lately. Give them chance.
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
mmttww said:
Haynes played well on Tue night. Walsall tore us to pieces down the flanks at their place (Phillips had to go off at HT) and troubled us very little there on Tue apart from a ten min spell before the goal. Haynes is doing enough to keep his place. A bit too hesitant about supporting the attack a couple of times on Tue but his decision making can only get better with games, just like Phillips has improved lately. Give them chance.
Click to expand...
Think most people ARE giving them a chance, but I think we all accept that Ricketts is a much better right back than Phillips and Stokes much, much better than Haynes.

I think as soon as Lorentzson is fit he'll be in at right back, with Ricketts at centre back. That will also enable Stokes to go back to left back.

I would feel so much better about a back four of Lorentzson Martin Ricketts Stokes than with Phillips and Haynes in there.

Haynes wasn't that bad on Tuesday, but he also wasn't good either. Stokes has been consistently good all season.
 
H

Hadji10

Well-Known Member
I'm not posting or looking at this forum ever again. Not one person on here talks any sense. Go and educate yourselves.
 
Samo

Samo

Well-Known Member
Hadji10 said:
I'm not posting or looking at this forum ever again. Not one person on here talks any sense. Go and educate yourselves.
Click to expand...

Thank fuck for that... you really are a colossal prick.
 
letsallsingtogether

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Oddly you guess wrong. Seems despite the nonsense I received when I indicated Haynes' shortcomings has now been forgotten.

Grendel is never wrong.
Click to expand...

Or when you disagreed that he had a good game, when you never even went to the game.
Grendel you find faults in most of our players at one time or another.
 
Astute

Astute

Well-Known Member
Hadji10 said:
I'm not posting or looking at this forum ever again. Not one person on here talks any sense. Go and educate yourselves.
Click to expand...

So what you are saying is that you don't talk sense either.
 
bawtryneal

bawtryneal

Well-Known Member
Otis said:
Think most people ARE giving them a chance, but I think we all accept that Ricketts is a much better right back than Phillips and Stokes much, much better than Haynes.

I think as soon as Lorentzson is fit he'll be in at right back, with Ricketts at centre back. That will also enable Stokes to go back to left back.

I would feel so much better about a back four of Lorentzson Martin Ricketts Stokes than with Phillips and Haynes in there.

Haynes wasn't that bad on Tuesday, but he also wasn't good either. Stokes has been consistently good all season.
Click to expand...

What about Ramage. I can see a back four of Rickets Ramage Martin Stokes

All playing in their best and natural positions

so, RCC.

Rickets Ramage Martin Stokes

Fleck Vincalot

New right midfield Maddison/Cole Murphy

Armstrong

bench. Burge Phillips Bigi JOB Tudgay
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
bawtryneal said:
What about Ramage. I can see a back four of Rickets Ramage Martin Stokes

All playing in their best and natural positions

so, RCC.

Rickets Ramage Martin Stokes

Fleck Vincalot

New right midfield Maddison/Cole Murphy

Armstrong

bench. Burge Phillips Bigi JOB Tudgay
Click to expand...
Well, basing my thoughts on what has been said about Lorentzson. If he's all they say he is then he will surely have to be first choice right back.

I think Ramage is just cover because we are so painfully thin at the back at the mo.
 
ajsccfc

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
You do question the times when your body is letting you down and you ask if there is any point doing it but then you try to remember yourself as a kid when all you wanted was to play football and doing something like cleaning your own boots takes you back to that and makes you appreciate it more
Click to expand...

I would love to take my kids on the pitch at the end of the season with a trophy. It would be a massive achievement and something I would be very proud of and up there with anything I’ve achieved
Click to expand...

If you are comparing me with Messi I ain’t had a good career but if you are comparing me to 99 per cent of the other footballers I’ve had a great career
Click to expand...


Considering that he still has name value that would allow him to coin it in somewhere, it's refreshing to read.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
I just play football, recover, have a few more days off, eat well, live well, and it seems to be working. I am not saying it is the answer – the proof will be in the pudding if I am still kicking a ball two or three years down the line.


No let up in the pies, then.
 
Skyblueweeman

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Two games in a row? You'd think we were playing top of the table sides - is that the sound of a bandwagon rolling that I can hear?
Click to expand...

I'm going to 2 games in a row for the first time ever. Am I a bandwagon jumper?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Two games in a row? You'd think we were playing top of the table sides - is that the sound of a bandwagon rolling that I can hear?
Click to expand...

I wonder if you have ever been to two away games in a row?

Personally I never criticise people for what games they do or don't go to. But when they are there, I do think the more the merrier!
 
Astute

Astute

Well-Known Member
Skyblueweeman said:
I'm going to 2 games in a row for the first time ever. Am I a bandwagon jumper?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Thats Grendel in a nutshell. He moans that supporters are not turning up when we are getting good results. But when they do turn up he calls them bandwagon jumpers :D
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
Hadji10 said:
I'm not posting or looking at this forum ever again. Not one person on here talks any sense. Go and educate yourselves.
Click to expand...

Back to give it loads to people on Twitter who can't give it back?


giphy.gif
 
Johhny Blue

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
skybluetony176 said:
It's worse than that. Before Cole was born dinosaurs roamed the earth. Since he was born there's not been one confirmed sighting of a dinosaur. 100% proof that Cole is responsible for the extinction of the dinosaur. What a bastard.
Click to expand...

But we haven't had a world war. Surely that cancels out his part in the great Dinosaur extinction
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Top