Seems like you are struggling a bit to accept the fact that people do actually have agendas on here.
They could well be on here, pretty sure you would be acting the victim if they were. The same as some do when RFC posts.
For me to act the victim of the back I'd have to take him seriously first and I stop doing that a long time ago. Perhaps you should start doing the same with intheknow.
It's a forum. If this forum didn't have members with agendas I would suggest it's unique in that respect.
Doesn't wind me up, I just find it funny how nobody seems to have an issue with somebody coming on here from Wasps pretty much mocking the club and it's fans. Pretty much the same as when people from ACL used to come on here and use it to post rumours, people lapped it up.
All it shows is that if people say things against SISU, our fans will lap it up no matter who they are or what they have done also. Joe Elliott is a great example.
RFC isn't Tim Fisher, if he was I am pretty sure people would take him seriously whether they believe him or not. Do you not think it says a few things when people from Wasps clearly show their agenda on here?
Yes, it is a forum for coventry city fans, not PR machines.
Can't say I've ever noticed him mocking the club but then I don't pay him as much attention as you. What specifically has he said about the club?
As for mocking fans he's only doing that to the few who are spitting feathers everytime he posts something. Again I don't really pay him any attention so I've never felt mocked by him.
Can't say I've ever noticed him mocking the club but then I don't pay him as much attention as you. What specifically has he said about the club?
As for mocking fans he's only doing that to the few who are spitting feathers everytime he posts something. Again I don't really pay him any attention so I've never felt mocked by him.
Read his posts....
Read his general smugness and attitude towards things ccfc.Why? What's he said specifically about the club to mock it?
Read his general smugness and attitude towards things ccfc.
Although it kind of shows our fans attitude when they defend somebody doing wasps pr on their teams forum.
Read his general smugness and attitude towards things ccfc.
Although it kind of shows our fans attitude when they defend somebody doing wasps pr on their teams forum.
His attempts at PR fail though surely, no one is liking Wasps more for him posting here, if anything it's the opposite.
So he's not said anything specific then?
Who's defending him? Does he post on the CCFC forum or just the Wasps sub forum? I've only noticed him on the Wasps sub forum, kind of invited posters with Wasps connections (whatever that might mean) to join when you set up a sub forum for them.
The view of the majority want the statue to stay at the Ricoh? What view? What majority?
Maybe your views are personal and that is fair enough but due to the breathtaking 180 turn around in attitude of the Trust (as a whole) over Sixfields and the warm welcome you'v extended to Wasps and the franchise then it's very easy to get confused. I don't want to get involved in the Trust, thanks very much, I don't have the necessary qualifications: hypocrisy, exaggerated self-importance
From what I've read I'm sure that Mowbray would actually support us building our own ground. He has already complained about those ugly insect badges inside the stadium.
Maybe it's one of the conditions of him signing a contract...
Trying to earn money from football is a mugs game.
I haven't set up a forum for them have I? It's to move the stuff that affects CCFC into, they have their own forum where from what I have read they would ban anybody for doing the same.
He has posted in both.
I agree, if he came on clearly on the wind up it would be different, but he normally says things that can be verified, and does provide balance to some debates (that are Wasps related). Not sure why he's so bothered about coming on here though, it's not as if there's many of us that ever change our view in the face of evidence anyway.
He never debates anything.
He provides no balance whatsoever.
I mean that he chips in to debates with a view that can then be debated further, and I'd say provides balance at times. I accept that you disagree.
If it effects CCFC why do we need a Wasps sub forum?
Well the best thing to do is put him on ignore then. He'd soon get bored if no one replied to him. I really don't see why he's coming on other than for laugh's. Might not have been the reason for him joining in the first place but its what's keeping him coming back.
Or perhaps we don't have people defending him and trying to use him and his views as a means to try and argue against other CCFC fans
People should challenge not ignore.
Who's defending him?
You for a start. You've refused to state his agenda is clearly wasps PR motivated.
You've been asked several occasions if you believe this and refused to answer.
You fifth amendment stance is a classic form of defence.
I think you best go back through my posts and then come back and apologise.
No need to. You've even tried to claim he only posts on wasps sub forum matters but the other day was deflecting and spinning when he was on a ccfc thread.
The only thing I claimed was that I couldn't remember him posting in anything other than the Wasps sub forum. Doesn't mean he hasn't, just that I don't recall it. Too simple for you to understand maybe.
Now go and actually READ my earlier posts and come back and apologise. It shouldn't be difficult. I've actually said what you're trying to say I haven't said more than once on this very thread. Of you go now.
You replied yesterday to a post regarding him in a ccfc thread. Either you've got some short term memory issues or your an idiot.
One things for certain - I'm not reading any of the inane tripe you put on here twice - believe me once is more than enough.
Jesus Christ, there are "ricoh haters" now? It's even stranger how some seem to support a football stadium?
Surely that minute says there is no storage space CCFC could use?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?