Politicians would rather pontificated on subjects that are of no relevance to them and which they have no control over rather than deal with the real issues that are. You get what you vote for.
I see Israel is threatening to pull out of the Eurovision Song Contest after the lyrics to their song were leaked. It sounds like it’s a party political broadcast for the kill all Palestinians party and there’s a political storm brewing over it.
Interestingly, I saw Eurovision may kick Israel out for political lyrics. Not sure which orifice you've pulled that from regarding the lyrics:
Could never understand why Israel and Austrailia were even in Eurovision? What continent is Israel in anyway?
How much is Gaza worth when it's redeveloped, beachfront Hotels,Trump tower's etc,must be stack's when they give pay out to all the acolytes?
Israel murdering starving people for being desperate for food. I'd expect nothing less from the IDF.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
Just what parliament needs. More mentals spouting conspiracy theories for social media clout.
You want more vetting of Labour members on their Gaza opinion now? Surprising.
Probably TBH. He expressed a common theory in Muslim communities, and certainly nothing close to as bad as Galloway has. So what’s been achieved?
He expressed a theory that has been in the MSM in Israel in various guises.
I think it was followed up with some blatant antisemitic rhetoric which was the issue.
Ive not seen that. Just reading the reports it says it was the “they knew” theory (which wasn’t uncommon as you say) and then after being called out for that a recording saying he’s getting shot from various people including the Jewish community. Again seems right.
But when you’re choosing George bloody Galloway instead the bar should really be a little higher. Which is I imagine why initially Labour didn’t withdraw support.
Ah what I read just said some people in the media from Jewish quarters.
Not one to defend Starmer but I don't see what other option he had.
Looking at it from a purely strategic point of view if they'd stood by Ali and his comments came out, or if it came out he'd known about them, it would have been far worse.
It was the right thing from a Labour POV. Just not sure as a society we’ve got it right when we choose Galloway instead. Perhaps be careful what you wish for if you want to exclude mild anti Jewish sentiment, you might end up will full on cat dressing autocrat sucking antisemitic mentalists.
Still not convinced. No place for the likes of Galloway and Bridgen and other social media grifters in Parliament for me.
Is Galloway antisemitic?
I'm not saying he's not, just I ve seen nothing from him, it may be out there.
I'm more concerned by his hard on for Putin and the common ground he has with anyone on the far right who also have a hard on for him.
Galloway serves himself, nobody else. It beggars belief.
People have voted for him based on his views about a conflict not in this country.
This says to me those voters couldn’t care less about their own Constituency or country. They have chosen someone not to help their community here, but someone to be a mouthpiece for the conflict they believe in. Anyone think that’s not a problem?
People have voted for him based on his views about a conflict not in this country.
This says to me those voters couldn’t care less about their own Constituency or country. They have chosen someone not to help their community here, but someone to be a mouthpiece for the conflict they believe in. Anyone think that’s not a problem?
Last edited:
Agree with you, the theory was widely reported by all of the mainstream media as well so Labour could have defended it better imo.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Just Googled it, said 'they'll be no Israeli flags on the CL trophy' when Spurs lost to Liverpool.
