It encourages both sides of the debate. Both sides.
As an example you swallowed the Burnham messaging on bus fares which was abject nonsense. To suggest you don’t formulate your ideas from social media messaging is beyond parody
And there’s another side that swallows the drivel from the Fox Killer in a Kimono and the odious grifter who tried to get riots in Middlesbrough started with Muslim acid attack lies.
And there’s another side that swallows the drivel from the Fox Killer in a Kimono and the odious grifter who tried to get riots in Middlesbrough started with Muslim acid attack lies.
I see the good old GLP is now raising funds to back the greens gender equality campaign (good luck with that given their latest influx of members) and a public enquiry for Arday.
The country pile meanwhile just gets bigger and bigger.
If you really want ultimately zero boat crossings then you find another country to house them before processing. You could achieve this. Sweden have used Estonia to house some prisoners. You could very easily find a country to house them. You could also then take a very long time to process them and adopt a rule only 10% a year would be allowed entry. The cost in the first few years would be much higher but very quickly the appetite to chance your luck to come would go very quickly
False dichotomy. We should be turning the boats around before they enter UK waters as well as treating ringleaders as terrorists and hunting them on foreign soil.
Let's be honest the small boats are ideal for the current and previous governments, they create a very useful scapegoat for the abject failure of their economic model (same applies in other parts of Western Europe to an extent).
False dichotomy. We should be turning the boats around before they enter UK waters as well as treating ringleaders as terrorists and hunting them on foreign soil.
Exactly, that’s why the HRA needs to be repealed and we should leave the ECHR. Dominic Cummings has spoken at length how these conventions and legislations paralyse the governments ability to deal with these challenges.
The web of these conventions are hopelessly outdated and demonstrably unfit for today’s challenges. They were drawn up in the 1950s with those specific challenges and contexts in mind.