Immigration and Asylum (20 Viewers)
- Thread starter mmttww
- Start date
Well there are multiple people now asking you for clarity on what should be a straightforward question - are you not able to answer it?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I think “multiple” is something of a stretch. It’s the same hapless crew of you, PVA (who just follows a certain crowd) and the bloke who didn’t even know you had to be in parliament to be Prime Minister.
What’s fascinating is how you rush on threads like this when a certain minority group is commented on but avoid commenting on comments like “everyone who votes reform and Tory don’t like brown people”
Why is that?
I made one post - pointing out the article you posted, which it seems you have based your claim on that you are now struggling to back up, is bollocks.
I swear your filibustering never used to be this obvious, you run out of steam so quickly these days
No but I do disagree with this statement:
"a large proportion of Pakistani Muslim men who are racist towards white girls and view them as white trash fit only for their sexual gratification"
mmttww
Well-Known Member
a bit rich when you're windmilling and whatabouting to avoid a fairly simple question or offer something that backs up a fairly sweeping statement.
there is quite a difference between
"disproportionate numbers of suspects from Asian ethnic backgrounds"
and
"a large proportion of Pakistani Muslim men who are racist towards white girls and view them as white trash fit only for their sexual gratification"
But you crack on
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Im not windmilling anything. Pakistani men groom white vunerable girls - tell the victims it’s not racially motivated
Shame on you
'Answer' hahah the pomposity and pretentiousness is off the scale, state of it
In some areas yes - as the report says.
mmttww
Well-Known Member
doesn't the article you shared conclude that grooming gangs chose who they abused based on how vulnerable the girls were or weren't? ('Type 1').
You might be right that it was racially motivated i.e. they chose white victims because they viewed them as lesser people than other ethnicities.
but you didn't start by talking about grooming gangs. You made a sweeping statement about how an ethnic group views another ethnic group.
You think Pakistani men groom white girls because they're white. If there's evidence, I'll read it. No one's arguing Pakistani men didn't groom white girls.
You think a large proportion of an ethnic group views white women as only existing for their sexual gratification. If there's evidence of that, I'll read it.
I'm replying to stuff you said. I read an article you shared. I asked a question or two. Your response is to go Game of Thrones and call people 'hapless'.