Immigration and Asylum (16 Viewers)

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Mine started as NQ at band 5 and was certainly not on 35 grand….unless they’ve had a 10-12 grand pay rise over the last 10 years.
Is NQ non qualified? Sorry if not, only guessing.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
My partner is middle band 6 as a midwife and is on circa 45k
Ah that's similar to what i just posted, but also is only newly qualified, so I don't know how that stacks up or if it's different by region. She's Worcestershire if that has any bearing.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Ok thanks. Also you said Band 5. I know she's only newly qualified, but also band 6 so I don't know how that differs in salary, but also why more than one entry level?
No idea! As far as I’m aware band 5 is for newly qualified. She was only early 20s though so maybe an age thing/other wider work experience ?
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Ah that's similar to what i just posted, but also is only newly qualified, so I don't know how that stacks up or if it's different by region. She's Worcestershire if that has any bearing.
Mine is Birmingham, shes been band 6 about 3 years now, but did train as a midwife in Uni
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Good luck recruiting nurses and midwives then!
Increase funding to train more domestically and scale down the need to import the labour.

You can’t justify the immigration system on the NHS. Particularly when the government is cutting funding for training spaces and trainee roles in the NHS, such as nurses and doctors.

Why do you and others dumb the argument down to nurses and midwives? They and their dependents are not free. There was an example where there was an average of 9 dependents arriving with Zimbabwean migrants via the health care visa route. This is an obvious abuse and not even a good economic trade off. I doubt many of the male small boat migrants will be doing courses in midwifery.

They weren’t actually going to Italy to live and work in Italy. In a lot of cases they were being acquired by people from South America to live and work in Spain. These were people who had a distant relative going back generations.

In these cases it’s absurd that someone born to foreign parents is denied citizenship - I think Ireland is the same.
You’ve missed the point. The citizenship routes were most likely a historical legacy from having huge numbers of Italian/Irish people leave the home land and your population declining.

My point was these laws probably aren’t tenable in the context where net migration is in the hundreds of thousands because this will probably open up a can of worms down the line.

Citizenship, imo shouldn’t be granted automatically upon birth. Even today, you need a ILR before your children are naturalised at birth. Personally, I’d bump that up to citizen status and only grant citizenship whereby people have clean criminal records, financially self-sufficient. What most countries do.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Once again today we're about 3 pages in arguing who is to blame, who is racist, which flavour of politician is culpable, wages, shortages in professions and other wide-ranging points.

Not a single post on how to tackle what is clearly a problem and only Pete acknowledging the victims, which is the saddest and most important point.

I'm not absolving my own responsibility in this either, I'm as guilty for as much of that as most of you who I'm calling out on the same, but these circular trends are apparent on this thread, the politics and many others.

I think I need to do what shmmeee has done and take a break from off-topic. Nothing is ever solved, it's not why I use this forum and it only winds me up even more tbh :(
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Increase funding to train more domestically and scale down the need to import the labour.

You can’t justify the immigration system on the NHS. Particularly when the government is cutting funding for training spaces and trainee roles in the NHS, such as nurses and doctors.

Why do you and others dumb the argument down to nurses and midwives? They and their dependents are not free. There was an example where there was an average of 9 dependents arriving with Zimbabwean migrants via the health care visa route. This is an obvious abuse and not even a good economic trade off. I doubt many of the male small boat migrants will be doing courses in midwifery.


You’ve missed the point. The citizenship routes were most likely a historical legacy from having huge numbers of Italian/Irish people leave the home land and your population declining.

My point was these laws probably aren’t tenable in the context where net migration is in the hundreds of thousands because this will probably open up a can of worms down the line.

Citizenship, imo shouldn’t be granted automatically upon birth. Even today, you need a ILR before your children are naturalised at birth. Personally, I’d bump that up to citizen status and only grant citizenship whereby people have clean criminal records, financially self-sufficient. What most countries do.
The issue is just as much about wages.

Not enough local people are willing to go through all that for the wages offered for the position. So if you want that you've got to increase the wages and conditions. But suggest that and it's "Oh no! That would cause inflation and be bad!"
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Home grown doctors are moving to other countries with better pay and conditions. If you want to provide those however you're 'hard left'.

I’m happy to provide it. Are you happy to have an indentikit system if the countries that can pay these salaries?
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
As a genuine question, how has that number been arrived at?
Migrant arrives aged 25 to retirement (modelled up to 100)… how much tax they pay v cost of public services they consume. Frankly speaking, the costs seem to focus on the pensions.

I’m note entirely sure how they modelled the exact costings of schooling (migrants have children too) and the NHS (if at all).

Likewise, the costs of building infrastructure such as roads and housing seem to have gone completely under the radar. It becomes apparent that the economic assumptions of immigration held in the 90-00s are increasingly coming into question.

Not all migrants are of equal economic value, even in the EU, a western EU migrant (Benelux, France and Germany) tended to be higher skill and income than one of the 2004 expansion countries. Since Brexit, we’ve gone further and supplanted EEA migration with non-EEA migration. Generally, lower income and lower skill than EEA migration.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Once again today we're about 3 pages in arguing who is to blame, who is racist, which flavour of politician is culpable, wages, shortages in professions and other wide-ranging points.

Not a single post on how to tackle what is clearly a problem and only Pete acknowledging the victims, which is the saddest and most important point.

I'm not absolving my own responsibility in this either, I'm as guilty for as much of that as most of you who I'm calling out on the same, but these circular trends are apparent on this thread, the politics and many others.

I think I need to do what shmmeee has done and take a break from off-topic. Nothing is ever solved, it's not why I use this forum and it only winds me up even more tbh :(
On the contrary I think it's actually shown there's a lot more overlap between people's views on this topic than they thought which has to be a useful thing. Compare it to what gets exchanged in other social media sites and although it's sometimes heated it's generally far more respectful.

Nobody is on team grooming gang on here, that goes without saying.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Once again today we're about 3 pages in arguing who is to blame, who is racist, which flavour of politician is culpable, wages, shortages in professions and other wide-ranging points.

Not a single post on how to tackle what is clearly a problem and only Pete acknowledging the victims, which is the saddest and most important point.

I'm not absolving my own responsibility in this either, I'm as guilty for as much of that as most of you who I'm calling out on the same, but these circular trends are apparent on this thread, the politics and many others.

I think I need to do what shmmeee has done and take a break from off-topic. Nothing is ever solved, it's not why I use this forum and it only winds me up even more tbh :(
I posed the question on how do we decide who in families of groomers to deport as you suggested, as well as the question where do you deport UK born but 2nd/3rd generation immigrants.

Did you respond?
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Mine started as NQ at band 5 and was certainly not on 35 grand….unless they’ve had a 10-12 grand pay rise over the last 10 years.


The table below details the starting and top-of-band salaries for an NHS Band 5 employee in England for 2015/16 and 2025/26 (salaries may vary in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland).

Pay Point2015/16 Salary2025/26 Salary
Entry (Starting)£21,692£31,049
Mid£25,783 (approximate)£33,487
Top of Band£28,462 (approximate)£37,796

The NHS Band 6 salary has seen a significant increase between 2015 and 2025, with the
starting salary rising from approximately £25,783 in April 2015 to £38,682 in April 2025in England. This represents an increase of approximately 50% over the decade.

add the benefits like pensions etc and guessing band 5 is £35k+ package

The beauty of Google !!
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
The issue is just as much about wages.

Not enough local people are willing to go through all that for the wages offered for the position. So if you want that you've got to increase the wages and conditions. But suggest that and it's "Oh no! That would cause inflation and be bad!"

Do you think importing labour from low income countries is conducive for wage growth?

What causes wage growth? Typically the market corrects itself when it’s competing for labour. Remember the HGV driver shortage a few years ago? Wages spiked.

In any case, the government is in all sorts of problems on ‘the budget’ and the only thing it’s really done is increase public sector pay… let’s see how unions like it when income tax increases wipes out a significant % of the pay rises negotiated.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Do you think importing labour from low income countries is conducive for wage growth?

What causes wage growth? Typically the market corrects itself when it’s competing for labour. Remember the HGV driver shortage a few years ago? Wages spiked.

In any case, the government is in all sorts of problems on ‘the budget’ and the only thing it’s really done is increase public sector pay… let’s see how unions like it when income tax increases wipes out a significant % of the pay rises negotiated.
Unions and other people don't mind paying higher tax if there's something tangible in return. The problem in this country for a long time has been paying through the nose for most things but getting a shitter deal year on year.
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
I thought the doctors and engineers line came from the left pushing that line when they were coming over in boats, they're all doctors and engineers coming to save us from ourselves as we're completely useless etc etc.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I thought the doctors and engineers line came from the left pushing that line when they were coming over in boats, they're all doctors and engineers coming to save us from ourselves as we're completely useless etc etc.
I mean if you can find quotes of people saying that then crack on
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
What does such a system look like?
Canada and Australia have socialised insurance systems. We’re one of the only countries where healthcare is completely socialised, all the healthcare workers are government employees and the buildings are owned by the government. As of right now, I just think that’s too much to be responsible for.

Probably a radical idea, but the NHS should be for UK citizens only. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect foreign-born residents to be self-sufficient and have their own private health insurance.

The NHS wasn’t created with the challenges of the 21st century in mind; net migration was on average 50k per year and we had a much younger population.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
If you don't want to work to integrate people then what other option do you have unless you want to ignore our international obligations and just not allow anyone into the country?

Even then the chances of a 100% success rate of stopping illegal immigration is unlikely to say the least.

Well you can ban all faith schools for a start. Also look at banning oppressive clothing. Ban arranged marriages etc
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Canada and Australia have socialised insurance systems. We’re one of the only countries where healthcare is completely socialised, all the healthcare workers are government employees and the buildings are owned by the government. As of right now, I just think that’s too much to be responsible for.

Probably a radical idea, but the NHS should be for UK citizens only. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect foreign-born residents to be self-sufficient and have their own private health insurance.

The NHS wasn’t created with the challenges of the 21st century in mind; net migration was on average 50k per year and we had a much younger population.
I'm happy with any form of universal healthcare that remains free at the point of use, not wedded to the government owning all the buildings and employing all the staff.

The issue I have is we have seen from the education sector that privately run but publicly funded set ups have diverted funds from the frontline service and into the hands of executives and other people whose roles didn't previously exist. The frontline service has then suffered more as a result.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I posed the question on how do we decide who in families of groomers to deport as you suggested, as well as the question where do you deport UK born but 2nd/3rd generation immigrants.

Did you respond?
I didn't tbf so I will then I'm out. this is my opinion only, no sources, so if people disagree fine. Right tin hat on here goes:

If the person in the grooming gang is UK born, but the parents were immigrants, then deport them too and siblings. If that means those who come here bring the children up to know it's a risk of all being deported, then I'd like to think it would be drummed into them the risk and how that might affect the wider family and reduce it almost immediately. From my very limited knowledge, most of the Muslim community even those who possibly view white teenage girls as trash, are often very family orientated in all other ways and wouldn't risk bringing harm or shame or deportation on their wider family.

If they are second generation British born, then as far as I'm concerned they are British and should be dealt with through the court system like you or I and serve an appropriate jail sentence.

For third generation they are of course all British so it's conviction and prison.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I'm happy with any form of universal healthcare that remains free at the point of use, not wedded to the government owning all the buildings and employing all the staff.

The issue I have is we have seen from the education sector that privately run but publicly funded set ups have diverted funds from the frontline service and into the hands of executives and other people whose roles didn't previously exist. The frontline service has then suffered more as a result.

Most doctors who leave go to countries that have an element of two tier healthcare - the system here just does not work.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member

Quilliam's researchers found 264 people have been convicted for the specific crime of gang grooming since 2005, and of those offenders 222 or 84% were Asian.

You didn't talk about Grooming Gangs. You talked about a large chunk of a whole segment of the population. It's a bit of leap to go from less than 300 people being guilty of horrific crimes to implying hundreds of thousands of men of a certain heritage see white women as trash, good only for their sexual gratification.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
I mean if you can find quotes of people saying that then crack on

“Among the refugees are doctors, engineers, scientists and journalists such as myself who led stable and successful lives until we were forced to flee to survive.” To save you trawling through the article.


 

Marty

Well-Known Member
I've just realised something. Anyone remember the Islamic ray guns bloke. What are the chances he meant islamic rape gangs but hes just thick as fuck and got mixed up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top