Golden FAN charge (1 Viewer)

[Skybluebaz]

Just seen that he has been charged with a breech of rule e3. Social media comment?

anyone know anything

 

---

[SlowerThanPlatt]

News to me

 

[Skybluebaz]

I hate spell checker.
title should of courose be.
Godden FA charge

 

[shmmeee]

The Penalty

Whilst we benefitted yesterday, let’s call it what is was ‘a dive’. Had it been given against us we would be furious and hammering the offending player. My concern now is that refs will have taken notice and that they will think twice about awarding free kicks for what may be genuine fouls...

www.skybluestalk.co.uk

 

[Sick Boy]

Christ

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

I hate spell checker.
title should of courose be.
Godden FA charge

E3 is a lot broader than social media comments

Rule E3 (1) relates to conduct and states:

“A Participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour”.

 

[joemercersaces]

I hate spell checker.
title should of courose be.
Godden FA charge

I know we have Phase 1 elites and Phase 2 scum but I did wonder who the golden fan was.

 

[usskyblue]

FUCK ! That came out of left field

 

[hill83]

Christ

Decent cross on him to be fair. Can do a job out wide.

 

[no_loyalty]

Golden fan.

 

[Skybluebaz]

Thanks shmmeee. I gave up reading that thread on Saturday So hadn’t seen yesterday’s post. Surely this opens up a massive can of worms if players are going to get retrospective charges For simulation.

 

[hill83]

Thanks shmmeee. I gave up reading that thread on Saturday So hadn’t seen yesterday’s post. Surely this opens up a massive can of worms if players are going to get retrospective charges For simulation.

It’s happened before. It’s rare. It’s nonsense.
Whilst I agree with decision that he dived, I’m not keen on the punishment after the fact. But I don’t think it will open up a can of worms.

 

[JAM See]

I know we have Phase 1 elites and Phase 2 scum but I did wonder who the golden fan was.

I am the golden fan, and my wife is too.

 

[usskyblue]

Decent cross on him to be fair. Can do a job out wide.

Our Biamou, who art in Grendel’s mind,
Hallowed be thy name

 

[jimmyhillsfanclub]

Golden fan.View attachment 22136

.....texture like sun

 

[duffer]

Decent cross on him to be fair. Can do a job out wide.

He's better as a keeper, mate...

"Christ Saves!"

"But Keegan gets the rebound!"

Am I the only one who remembers the seventies?

 

[slowpoke]

It’s happened before. It’s rare. It’s nonsense.
Whilst I agree with decision that he dived, I’m not keen on the punishment after the fact. But I don’t think it will open up a can of worms.

I think could open cans of worms this is going attract publicity and attention. and I bet within a month there will be a number of complaints & not necessarily just re: penaltys. Whatever we think about dive or no dive a photo on SBT clearly shows a Fulham player with a leg sticking out.
That happens every week somewhere.

 

[Offhegoes]

Immediate 5 game ban according to what I read.

 

[Sick Boy]

I think could open cans of worms this is going attract publicity and attention. and I bet within a month there will be a number of complaints & not necessarily just re: penaltys. Whatever we think about dive or no dive a photo on SBT clearly shows a Fulham player with a leg sticking out.
That happens every week somewhere.

There wasn’t much publicity around the WBA one.

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

There wasn’t much publicity around the WBA one.

He’s on a different planet. Nobody outside of CCFC fans will be bothered

 

[slowpoke]

Different case

He’s on a different planet. Nobody outside of CCFC fans will be bothered

You won’t be that’s a fact negativity around ccfc suits your agenda.

 

[Tommo1993]

Remember when the administrators spent all that time looking for the golden share?

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

Different case
You won’t be that’s a fact negativity around ccfc suits your agenda.

Not at all, it just isn’t going to cause the outrage you think

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

Thanks shmmeee. I gave up reading that thread on Saturday So hadn’t seen yesterday’s post. Surely this opens up a massive can of worms if players are going to get retrospective charges For simulation.

It’s only happened once in the Championship to my knowledge. This game would have been on TV too

Leeds' Patrick Bamford banned for two games after Aston Villa controversy

Patrick Bamford has been handed a two-match ban by the FA for successfully deceiving a match official during Leeds controversial 1-1 draw with Aston Villa last weekend.

www.google.co.uk

 

[Greggs]

I think a Fulham fan has been trawling through twitter and dug up a post from 1993 when Godden made a derogatory comment about Dale Winton and his new show. Very strange, was a great show.

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

It’s only happened once in the Championship to my knowledge. This game would have been on TV too

Leeds' Patrick Bamford banned for two games after Aston Villa controversy

Patrick Bamford has been handed a two-match ban by the FA for successfully deceiving a match official during Leeds controversial 1-1 draw with Aston Villa last weekend.

www.google.co.uk

 

[hill83]

I think could open cans of worms this is going attract publicity and attention. and I bet within a month there will be a number of complaints & not necessarily just re: penaltys. Whatever we think about dive or no dive a photo on SBT clearly shows a Fulham player with a leg sticking out.
That happens every week somewhere.

What are people not understanding about me saying it’s happened before. It’s happened before. Show me the worms.

 

[hill83]

Different case
You won’t be that’s a fact negativity around ccfc suits your agenda.

I don’t normally do this. Are you skybluekid?

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

I don’t normally do this. Are you skybluekid?

rupert_bear

 

[slowpoke]

Each case has its own mitigating circumstances. I don’t know the procedures now not been involved in disciplinary issue in footy for years. The procedure used to be there has to be a formal complaint within a time scale 48 hours I think & if FA think there’s a case to answer they deal with it in their disciplinary set up.
I’ll tell you what’s happened in my opinion Fulham manager Marco Silva is attempting to deflect his manager frailties for self protection his super duper promotion favourites got a good old fashioned mauling from a team that just had a bollocking three days before. lost at lowly Blackpool too, Fulham need promotion at the moment I think his job is at risk.

 

[vow]

Remember when the administrators spent all that time looking for the golden share?


View attachment 22137

Haha, your talents are wasted on here m8

 

[Skybluebaz]

Each case has its own mitigating circumstances. I don’t know the procedures now not been involved in disciplinary issue in footy for years. The procedure used to be there has to be a formal complaint within a time scale 48 hours I think & if FA think there’s a case to answer they deal with it in their disciplinary set up.
I’ll tell you what’s happened in my opinion Fulham manager Marco Silva is attempting to deflect his manager frailties for self protection his super duper promotion favourites got a good old fashioned mauling from a team that just had a bollocking three days before. lost at lowly Blackpool too, Fulham need promotion at the moment I think his job is at risk.

Well it’s either silva complaining. Referees assessor or cockney centric media

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Well it’s either silva complaining. Referees assessor or cockney centric media

Media for me

 

[slowpoke]

Well it’s either silva complaining. Referees assessor or cockney centric media

No it will be Fulham almost certainly on Silva’s request.

 

[skyblueeyesrevisited]

Im not worried because he has to be found guilty of the charge. I’m sure the FA committee (Danny Murphy, Bobby Zamora, Richard Osman and the statue of Michael Jackson) will find in his favour.