Yeah first and foremost we recognise the loss yep I see that
It should be a watershed moment. If that was me I’d be distraught at what my organisation had done and be calling for reform. Instead it comes across more like “yeah I guess we should say things nicer or something, but we were right to be so rigorous”
It’s this attitude from Ofsted that kids are best served by being cunts to teachers. Like teachers arent also trying to serve families and students. That whole attitude in both Ofsted and the govt at the moment seeps through. It says “teacher are lazy fuckers and if we don’t kick them then children will be let down!” Mixed in with a bit of jobsworthness that means if an HR doc is missing years of hard work making kids lives better is for naught. I was at a school that got inadequate once. It was entirely down to attendance. Everything else was great. Attendance was low because we took in kids with long term sickness and actually were brilliant at keeping their education going while in an out of hospital. All the inspector saw was “number says no”. It destroyed a fantastic school. Head went. Staff left. Like this school kids and families were happy, who exactly is being served here?
That statement to me just shows that that woman still thinks the right thing happened. Still thinks it’s not a damning statement on the competence of her inspectors that a school went from outstanding to inadequate back to good in half a year.
Ofsted judgements are a total crap shoot. They’re sprung last minute and teachers are expected to drop everything and work 20 hour days for a three days. We end careers (and lives) on these judgements, schools and communities are ripped apart by them. And the worst thing? The best evidence we have suggests that there is nothing objective whatsoever about the distinction between a good school, a requires improvement school and an inadequate school. The most important factor is the inspectors not anything the school does.
I could go on and on about how useless and counterproductive HMI are.