Still the party of law and orderThe party of law and order. Unless it’s one of them.
Five Tory MPs breached code of conduct by trying to influence judge in Charlie Elphicke sex assault trial, committee rules
Charlie Elphicke was suspended from the Conservatives in 2017 after he was accused of sexual offences against two members of staff, and later sentenced to two years in prison.news.sky.com
The party of law and order. Unless they can use it to stoke a culture war.
If that is accurate its appalling and sheer hypocrisy.Best thing she's ever said
If that is accurate its appalling and sheer hypocrisy.
If that is accurate its appalling and sheer hypocrisy.
She is right though. They are making a load of staff redundant as they’re broke, and employing replacements on insecure, short term contracts.She has blocked public comments on it. She’s a deranged lunatic so I doubt anyone takes seriously anything she says
She is right though. They are making a load of staff redundant as they’re broke, and employing replacements on insecure, short term contracts.
And I’m sure if her former camper van shag did this she’d have been as vehement
She probably would to be fair… not every Labour politician is vacuous and morally bankrupt, even if you do hate her politics.And I’m sure if her former camper van shag did this she’d have been as vehement
The spin on the jobs at Labour hq is not true
Which bit isn’t true?The spin on the jobs at Labour hq is not true
Which bit isn’t true?
So they are hiring temporary workers to do the jobs of those they are making redundant.Read the article you posted. They aren’t the same job and they aren’t agency workers. It’s not fire and rehire.
they’re hiring temporary workers to clear the backlog of complaints. The article spin on a basic WFH temporary contract is hilarious. “They ask people to have their own Wi-Fi“
no they are notSo they are hiring temporary workers to do the jobs of those they are making redundant.
So if they are thinking about making redundancies (which they are) then why not re-deploy existing staff to do the jobs of the temporary staff, if there is such a need to deal with a backlog of complaints?no they are not
So if they are thinking about making redundancies (which they are) then why not re-deploy existing staff to do the jobs of the temporary staff, if there is such a need to deal with a backlog of complaints?
So they are hiring temporary workers to do the jobs of those they are making redundant.
Not what I said at all - but feel free to spin what I said in your usual defence of Starmer. So everything is fine, and any issues or problems are because of the ‘salty left’You think a third of Labour’s staff work in complaints? Really?
Not what I said at all - but feel free to spin what I said in your usual defence of Starmer. So everything is fine, and any issues or problems are because of the ‘salty left’
You should do these TEDtalks more often.
Not quite sure where you get this idea of hatred from, I’m a paid up member just like you.Sorry you can’t back up your weird hatred of the only left wing party in this country.
You said it was fire and rehire. A third of staff are being asked to take VR, the new hires are a temporary increase in capacity in the complaints department. That’s not fire and rehire. Fire and rehire is firing someone (no one is being fired) then rehiring someone to do that job (that’s not happening and couldn’t legally as they’re being made redundant and you can’t hire someone in a position you made redundant for a period of time).
It’s yet another pathetic attack on Starmer based in fantasy from people who have been crying they fucked up their chance with the party and someone else is getting a go.
It was pathetic when the right did it. It’s pathetic when the left do it.
The story is made to make Labour look bad by twisting the story to make it look like they are firing some people and hiring others. Tories doing the same would be a company managing their finances well in desperate Financial Times!Not quite sure where you get this idea of hatred from, I’m a paid up member just like you.
But equally, as a member I don’t think it’s beyond unreasonable to want to know why a political party that 3 years ago was loaded is now in the shit financially and having to make redundancies of any sort? And seeing as the party refuse to produce any kind of reasonable response other than ‘it’s that pesky Corbyn’s fault’ the only information seem to be from crank left news organisations like the Independent.
It’s actually again the people working for/advising Starmer (in this case Evans) that are doing a Sterling job of making his party look like muppets.
Not quite sure where you get this idea of hatred from, I’m a paid up member just like you.
But equally, as a member I don’t think it’s beyond unreasonable to want to know why a political party that 3 years ago was loaded is now in the shit financially and having to make redundancies of any sort? And seeing as the party refuse to produce any kind of reasonable response other than ‘it’s that pesky Corbyn’s fault’ the only information seem to be from crank left news organisations like the Independent.
It’s actually again the people working for/advising Starmer (in this case Evans) that are doing a Sterling job of making his party look like muppets.
The true bits are true the assumptions are assumptions and the perceptions are perceptions
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?