Glad to see we have added some pace to te team with Fleck and Elliott signing.
We still need a prolific goalscorer, a CM and 2 centre backs.
Think how crap our players are when they leave.
Dann
Fox
Westwood
Gunnar
All rubbish when they left us according to some fans.
Im not sure fleck has much pace? from what I have seen and heard he is a creative force rather than an out and out winger?
Deal is done announcement to be made today on rangers offal
http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/football-news/article/2831446
The few YouTube vids I have seen he seems pacey.
Although accordingtl rangers he has got fat so maybe not as pacey these days! Lol
That sort of implies a fee is involved?
That sort of implies a fee is involved?
Think how crap our players are when they leave.
Dann
Fox
Westwood
Gunnar
All rubbish when they left us according to some fans.
That sort of implies a fee is involved?
Deal is done announcement to be made today on rangers offal
http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/football-news/article/2831446
Was that relevant in the slightest? Thought it was the player we needed to agree terms with, not Rangers?!?
I think beacuse they are claiming the players have to transfer to Newco, we have given some form of compensation to stop further legals.........SISU showing sense in business at last shock-horror
Wowsers........ it's like I can read into the future.
On Rangers offal!!!!!
AN inaccurate media report this morning suggests the Club is taking legal action against John Fleck over his move to Coventry City.
Both clubs have in fact reached agreement for the transfer of the player and Coventry have recognised Rangers rights as part of the process.A formal announcement will be made later today.
Hmmmmmm ....
Or even SISU paying out money they don't have to a company that they don't need to pay. Newco are not Rangers, I'm sure i read last week that the players have no legal obligation to transfer as the company that they are employed by has been Liquidated.
Or even SISU paying out money they don't have to a company that they don't need to pay. Newco are not Rangers, I'm sure i read last week that the players have no legal obligation to transfer as the company that they are employed by has been Liquidated.
http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/football-news/article/2831446
Read the official site lads, sounds like Fleck is coming to Cov! BOOM
From the Rangers Site:
On Rangers offal!!!!!
AN inaccurate media report this morning suggests the Club is taking legal action against John Fleck over his move to Coventry City.
Both clubs have in fact reached agreement for the transfer of the player and Coventry have recognised Rangers rights as part of the process.A formal announcement will be made later today.
Deal is done announcement to be made today on rangers offal
http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/football-news/article/2831446
All other players leaving rangers are free transfers so I would imagine we wouldn't offer any sort of deal. There is no rangers, he doesn't play for newco so he is fair game.Tend to agree, but if the offer were, say, 20% of any sell on fee that would be potentially some profit lost later (assuming the lad plays well for us) rather than the cost of a possible legal fight now - which we clearly can't afford.
Bang! .
All other players leaving rangers are free transfers so I would imagine we wouldn't offer any sort of deal. There is no rangers, he doesn't play for newco so he is fair game.
But I linked it my dear.
All other players leaving rangers are free transfers so I would imagine we wouldn't offer any sort of deal. There is no rangers, he doesn't play for newco so he is fair game.
This being said a few Blackpool fans I know say he isn't great but we are a division lower now!
'Coventry City Football Club wishes to state that, contrary to widespread media reports and indeed from Rangers Football Club, that the club will not be signing John Fleck. The club is keen at this point to emphasise that such a move would signify ambition which at this stage in proceedings is not acceptable to the board.'
Have you got a link for that mate?
Tend to agree, but if the offer were, say, 20% of any sell on fee that would be potentially some profit lost later (assuming the lad plays well for us) rather than the cost of a possible legal fight now - which we clearly can't afford.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?