fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
£34m? It was approx £10m and they've in essence invested a further £14m by way of a loan to ACL.
Move out the way council?? what and give SISU control of a city asset, i don't trust them to run the club never mind give them more connection to our city.. They can't be trusted and if they have not shown this over the last 8 years you will never see wrong in how these people are allowed to carry on the distruction of the club.. I do agree the council should not be involved in the club but maybe they are the only ones who are strong enough to stand up against SISU who have no regard for our club, city or its people..
Secondly the council paid for the stadium and surely have as much right as anyone to ask the market price for it not 7mill as priced by SISU, because pound to a pinch of shit they would not sell it for that if they got rights to sellling it...And if its about people getting the money back then i think 34 mill was the CCC input, so although they have had monies back the certainly haven't had 27mill out of it...
Albeit in a part of the world where commercial land and property costs a lot more.
Not that it's even worth arguing over the merits of the 'new stadium', it won't happen.
I'd sooner the club owned it than either party.
£34m? It was approx £10m and they've in essence invested a further £14m by way of a loan to ACL.
£34m? It was approx £10m and they've in essence invested a further £14m by way of a loan to ACL.
Where did the rest of the money for the build come from?
Very true. Can't really compare with London prices. And agree there will be no 'new stadium'
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Tesco
Yet mr Linnel Is absolutely convinced they will build It If necessary.
Tesco
He also thought anyone who wanted thorn sacked "knows nothing about football"
Seem to remember yes 59 million wasn't it? So why didn't the council just keep the money?
Move out the way council?? what and give SISU control of a city asset, i don't trust them to run the club never mind give them more connection to our city.. They can't be trusted and if they have not shown this over the last 8 years you will never see wrong in how these people are allowed to carry on the distruction of the club.. I do agree the council should not be involved in the club but maybe they are the only ones who are strong enough to stand up against SISU who have no regard for our club, city or its people..
Secondly the council paid for the stadium and surely have as much right as anyone to ask the market price for it not 7mill as priced by SISU, because pound to a pinch of shit they would not sell it for that if they got rights to sellling it...And if its about people getting the money back then i think 34 mill was the CCC input, so although they have had monies back the certainly haven't had 27mill out of it...
He also thought anyone who wanted thorn sacked "knows nothing about football"
I would sooner the Council own it than Sisu, wouldn't you?
If you have a better idea then the floor is yours......
Problem is you'll say either:
A) Sisu should sell the Club to someone who can be trusted
B) Take a rent deal at the Ricoh
Of which none of the two options bare any relevance as both have been dismissed, the easiest way to sort this would be for the Clun and the Ricoh to be united as one, problem is everyone comes out with a million reasons why that shouldn't be the case.
A Council is not allowed to own a Football Club so although that's way you may prefer it's not as likely that the Council will own the Club before Sisu own the Ricoh
To be fair there are a millions reasons.
For the club to own it someone would have to buy the Ricoh and give it to the club.
I did mean ownership of the Ricoh in saying I prefer CCC to own it over Sisu.
By buying land owned by the Council :facepalm:
i'd give that a like Grendel but the button is playing up.
I posted my opinion, answers to a the problem i don't have.. What i do know is that Sisu should not control the Ricoh and in my opinion be owners of OUR football club. Answers to that problem will come in time, but i hope when these people leave the fans have more control in both club and stadium to stop this situation ever happening again.
Would the council have invested £54m without Tesco? Yes or no will do.
You going to answer my question?
Seem to remember yes 59 million wasn't it? So why didn't the council just keep the money?
Tesco
If only they had
Would the council have invested £54m without Tesco? Yes or no will do.
If it's not being disputed that the council got Tesco to pay £54m for council owned land than it follows that it was the councils money and there's nothing to say they had to put it into the arena project. No reason they couldn't have sold the land to Tesco and not bothered building a new ground.
Would the council have invested £54m without Tesco? Yes or no will do.
If only they had
............. then CCFC would not exist.
Tesco may not have paid that much for the land had it not been part of a bigger development project and vision.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?