shmmeee
Well-Known Member
They won’t tell us though will they. Who would they open up to? Can someone go to a meeting and get answers?
Even so, they have some of the answers we are after. They met with wasps and apparently questioned them about it recently.
Sadly, they are still the "go to group" for any media that aren't half aware of what has gone on, and obviously media chums with CovTel and CWR.Sorry. Having a nightmare day and am a bit on edge.
I think the trust are a busted flush. They’ve pissed Sisu off too much and frankly are pretty childish. I’d rather bypass them.
Check out this property to rent on PrimeLocation!.....it's too quiet (trust/cov tel) for the indemnity to have been removed or worked around.... if it has, there are no massive obstacles for us to return to The Ricoh... other than ourselves (CCFC)... and if that was the case, the usuals would be whipping up a frenzy against ccfc/SISU
Really think Linell might have been just a bit ignorant to the situation and not fully up to speed.... there is a lot to get heads around! Somebody said Clive DID mention ind6being an issue on Weds...
Either that, what with the (although not unusual) silence from Trust/tel, that something weird (god knows what though...) is going on...
Rumours of Ricoh firm moving offices (anybody noticed red signs not been on for ages?) Rumours of Vodafone pulling out of naming rights due to no CCFC?
Who knows.....?
Not difficult is it. If you're meeting Wasps on behalf of fans question 1 is to confirm there is an indemnification requirement and question 2 is how is that reasonable.What's the point? They met with wasps and apparently asked these questions, what was said? They have some answers to these questions.
Is this part of a PR strategy from Wasps to make themselves look like the good guys ahead of any return? Oh look what we did to get the club back in Coventry...Next Friday Linnell will day his sources confirm what he’s already been told and Dave Boddy is denying it but won’t debate with him
When in fact, any remedy imposed would be the council’s fault. It would be more reasonable for the council to indemnify wasps, but that would probably be viewed as state aid.I know it isn't but I don't think the general public look at it that way, it's seen that any remedy the EC imposes somehow is SISU's fault
Exactly, Wasps knew the situation when they purchased the arena. Its inconceivable their lawyers didn't bring it up. If anyone should be providing indemnity for Wasps it should be the council given that it will only cost Wasps money if CCC are found to be in the wrong.When in fact, any remedy imposed would be the council’s fault. It would be more reasonable for the council to indemnify wasps, but that would probably be viewed as state aid.
But it was never offered to SISU on the open market, was it?I read the article I posted a link to and it often seems that central government take the punishment and fines, there are situations where the “beneficiary” could be charged and have to repay the benefit plus interest but what is the benefit?
A discounted sale price, hard to judge when it open market tested with other parties and if CCC could prove that SISU would meet that same amount then arguably, not discounted.
Correct, it would indeed be the fault of the council. I don't believe the public understands this necessarilyWhen in fact, any remedy imposed would be the council’s fault. It would be more reasonable for the council to indemnify wasps, but that would probably be viewed as state aid.
You can only assume either Wasps lawyers made huge mistake and didn't cover that off which in inconceivable to me. Not like this is something that has come up years later, they would have known at the time what was going on.It wouldn't as long as it was pre agreed in a contract, there are indemnity clauses in public contracts.
Due diligence cockups not new. Both parties too eager to get the deal done?Exactly, Wasps knew the situation when they purchased the arena. Its inconceivable their lawyers didn't bring it up.
But it was never offered to SISU on the open market, was it?
They're rather stupid then, SISU applied for JR1 in 2013 over what is essentially the same issue.Due diligence cockups not new. Both parties too eager to get the deal done?
Doubt anyone thought all this was going to end up being judged in the EU legal system when they signed the deals.
He'll no doubt be conflating some of the offers made in negotiations back in 2012 or some rubbishWell oddly Linnell said once his sources said 3 times. I think his source is not very reliable
What’s your handle matey?I’ve sent a message those who follow me retweet it - it’s carefully worded and polite
What’s your handle matey?
Least thry read out pauls email i guessHa ha Eakin now backtracking on his indemnity message. He’s stonewalling and pretty much admitting he can’t answer
As the local radio sports reporter, if he is to have any credibility, he really should make it his mission to get to the truth of the matter.Ha ha Eakin now backtracking on his indemnity message. He’s stonewalling and pretty much admitting he can’t answer
Can understand if people are nervous about going on the radio or phoning up but there is a phone in tomorrow aswell isn’t there 6pm?
Does anyone (must be calm and reasonable) fancy taking on the mantle again by phoning up Monday during the phone in?
"suggested"Interesting when pushed CJ came out with this,
"From what I remember"Interesting when pushed CJ came out with this,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?