No but describing them as 'Nazifems' and other such choice words says it all. Also treating like commodities as you clearly do also speaks volumes about yourself. The vast majority of beautiful young woman probably falls into the naizifems category that you seem to have.
That whole thread is tongue in cheek and I'd wager that every other poster on there is well adjusted with women and don't require some nonsense self-help ebook or academic books to help them understand fellow people.
I would also go a touch further and guess that you aren't a genuine CCFC fan and are simply on here as a persona to promote various self-books and your own ebook.
In an embarrassing twist for Miss Proudman, it has now emerged she made comments about the appearance of men on Facebook.
She also commented on the looks of female friends, saying one looked “stunning” – the same word used by Mr Carter-Silk.
According to the Daily Mail, she wrote “Hot stuff!” on the profile of a male postgraduate student at Cambridge, while under an image of a long-haired male friend, she wrote: “oooo lalala!”
Whilst I couldn't really care about what she said as I don't think it is an issue, just screams out hypocrisy.
In an embarrassing twist for Miss Proudman, it has now emerged she made comments about the appearance of men on Facebook.
She also commented on the looks of female friends, saying one looked “stunning” – the same word used by Mr Carter-Silk.
According to the Daily Mail, she wrote “Hot stuff!” on the profile of a male postgraduate student at Cambridge, while under an image of a long-haired male friend, she wrote: “oooo lalala!”
Whilst I couldn't really care about what she said as I don't think it is an issue, just screams out hypocrisy.
No but describing them as 'Nazifems' and other such choice words says it all. Also treating like commodities as you clearly do also speaks volumes about yourself. The vast majority of beautiful young woman probably falls into the naizifems category that you seem to have.
I would also go a touch further and guess that you aren't a genuine CCFC fan and are simply on here as a persona to promote various self-books and your own ebook.
Just count yourself lucky we never see any of that on here.
In an embarrassing twist for Miss Proudman, it has now emerged she made comments about the appearance of men on Facebook.
She also commented on the looks of female friends, saying one looked “stunning” – the same word used by Mr Carter-Silk.
According to the Daily Mail, she wrote “Hot stuff!” on the profile of a male postgraduate student at Cambridge, while under an image of a long-haired male friend, she wrote: “oooo lalala!”
Whilst I couldn't really care about what she said as I don't think it is an issue, just screams out hypocrisy.
Latest "development"...
But, it has now emerged the female barrister has made comments about the appearance of men online.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/sisu-ricoh-arena-lawyer-centre-10034882
The whole story is more than a bit silly but referring to your daughter as hot is not really the sort of words that a father should be using.
The whole story is more than a bit silly but referring to your daughter as hot is not really the sort of words that a father should be using.
Depends on context surely? I'd read it as him trying to be an embarrassing dad rather than Incestual.
Just to give an extra-simple recap for those who are still getting upset about this:
Complimenting a friend's appearance in a casual/social environment - probably fine
Complimenting a stranger's appearance in a formal/professional environment - generally not a good idea
But of course, you don't think this is an issue, do you.
What's the difference between the guy thinking she is stunning and telling the social media world she is? Or perhaps that's for the philosophy thread
And what's the difference between the woman saying she finds it offensive and telling the world, it's dog and the media her views.
Unfortunately the world we live in allows people to make crass comments, over the top responses and then allows us all to join in and give our two penny worth.
We see on here everyday 'troll' type comments that just wouldn't happen if we weren't slaves to our mobiles, tablets and computers.
As for this pair...the dirty old man should stop perving (wonder what his wife and kids think) and the self-aggrandising woman should get on with her job/life
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here's a picture of mountain:
View attachment 4606
And here's a picture of a mole hill:
View attachment 4607
Well I can see why she would be annoyed, but to call him a sexist misogynist and call spread it all over the UK is way over the top.
Latest "development"...
Sisu Ricoh Arena lawyer at centre of LinkedIn sexism row also called his own daughter ‘hot’ on Facebook.
But, it has now emerged the female barrister has made comments about the appearance of men online.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/sisu-ricoh-arena-lawyer-centre-10034882
Looks like we got another white knight here.
Looks like we got another white knight here.
Its only spread because people think its outrageous to compliment a womans appearance, nothing rude or insulting about the actual content of what he said just the wrong place for it. You've already acknowledged that by saying her messages objectifying men were ok because they were done in a different context. The reaction is nuts, he already apologised in private but she wants him to grovel in public and humiliate him, how is that fair and promoting equality?
I've only really followed the story on the Coventry Telegraph site and whats been posted on here, I'm guessing whatever the mail has printed came as a reaction to the over the top response in the first place, tit for tat.
Complimenting a friend's appearance in a casual/social environment - probably fine
Complimenting a stranger's appearance in a formal/professional environment - generally not a good idea
Thank goodness for the update Simon, I dont know how I would have coped without an update on the most banal shit currently mascerading as news.
It must be a quiet day at the CT if reading the Daily Mail has given you this scoop.
24 pages in, and you've almost twigged that this is all about context. Nearly there, mate - here's my reminder again:
I honestly don't get why people are suddenly so concerned about this guy's career, or why it's so crazy to want a public apology. Are people really more offended by that than they are by sexism? Unless of course, it serves your own agenda to try and distract from the original problem. "Tit for tat", I suppose.
The first bit is actually from the Evening Standard, but it's still of interest to our readers. It's a story of national interest, that's been widely covered by national publications and broadcasters, with a local link.
Not unusual for news outlets to share copy from other sources. We just have the decency to credit when we do, unlike some down-market publications which try to pass other people's stories off as their own.
I appreciate it won't be to everybody's liking. But then I don't think anyone has ever written a story which is.
Virtually all started threads are non football related and certainly non ccfc related.
He did make one that didn't really take off. Still the one contributor provided a chuckle on a depressing Friday.
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/8692-Andy-Thorn-and-Paul-Cloutting-interview-on-the-Sportsbar
No mate it was one of the first things I said in this thread, can't be discussing this with someone who can't read.
Because if it was someone I knew, I would be very unhappy there name and career is dragged through the mud for what is a misjudged comment rather than a very offensive comment. I've already seen calls on this thread for him to be disbarred which is way over the top.
It was sent as a private message, the language used wasn't offensive. It was made public without his knowledge, he has already privately apologised, his law firm have publicly apolgised, he has already been publicly humiliated. What more do people want?
I'm not against discussions like this taking place but at least choose worthy examples, I'm sure there is enough of them out there rather than making a scapegoat of someone.
If it was someone I knew I would be mortified. I'm not baying for blood here, but I think she's within her rights to ask for a public apology if she thinks it's appropriate. Clearly she's hoping to draw attention to an issue that she thinks is important, but I don't think she's going overboard in doing so. Obviously some people disagree - maybe they just don't think there's a problem with this kind of behaviour. Either way, I don't think it's helpful to concentrate our energy on criticizing the 'victim' rather than the guy who screwed up in the first place.
It was a gaffe on his part, I don't see what purpose a public apology serves when he's already privately apologised other than to further crucify him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?