Who's to say the next owners would unite the stadium with CCFC, look at Leicester the owners bought the stadium but it is a seperate company owned by their group of Companies and not directly by lester
Were all just grabbing at straws hoping that ACL have a buyer lined up, but just remember this is Coventry and we have a habit of being continuously shat on.
All i know is i will continue to support my team, home and away for the rest of the season and then see what happens. PUSB
Were all just grabbing at straws hoping that ACL have a buyer lined up, but just remember this is Coventry and we have a habit of being continuously shat on.
All i know is i will continue to support my team, home and away for the rest of the season and then see what happens. PUSB
Absolutely. ACL "believe" there is someone out there who wants Coventry City.
Hope they are right.
Who's to say the next owners would unite the stadium with CCFC, look at Leicester the owners bought the stadium but it is a seperate company owned by their group of Companies and not directly by lester
Were all just grabbing at straws hoping that ACL have a buyer lined up, but just remember this is Coventry and we have a habit of being continuously shat on.
All i know is i will continue to support my team, home and away for the rest of the season and then see what happens. PUSB
All this talk about FFP next season, I didn't realise it only affects us. How come other clubs can stay at 65% of income next year but we have to drop to 60%?
Ferret,
But in this case the absolute proof exists in the form of a (unoposed!) high court judgement that SISU/CCFC acted illegally in not paying the rent and were instructed to pay the rent by a fixed date that has long since passed and on the basis of which ACL have petitioned the high court to apoint an administrator. So no, I did not make a "bold statement", I stated a simple and evident truth that cannot be denied.
I will not bother commentating on the rest of your response as others have pointed out the truth which you continue to deny, so pointless me even trying to make any further comment.
It's 60% in L1 from next season for everyone.
Sarcasm my good man.
FFP is dropping 5% for everyone as you say. That reduction is going to be just as difficult for our competitors to deal with as us.
Except that our competitors don't have to shell out £1.3m rent pa before they start.
:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
Hook, line and sinker.
Can't be arsed explaining just how ridiculous your statement is
Just thinking and reading some other posts, but one question which we might find out tomorrow. If the rent agreement for the Ricoh and the golden ticket to buy back the higgs share is with CCFC Limited and this is who ACL are having placed into administration. But the Players registrations and the football league ticket is with CCFC Holdings does this not change the outcome of this administration hearing?
Does anyone have a better understanding of how this tower of cards is laid out?
Irrelevant to fpp but not to the running if the club. No point limiting us to 60% if its worth fk all to begin with. No product or prospects = less support = less revenue = less to spend and on the downward spiral continuesWhich is irrelevant as its based on Turnover.
Sarcasm my good man.
FFP is dropping 5% for everyone as you say. That reduction is going to be just as difficult for our competitors to deal with as us.
It is interesting. My thoughts would be to go for CCFC Holdings, which presumably also controls CCFC Ltd? Or can the whole group be put into admin?
I guess this s the reason 'fan' john clarke resigned from the board?
Not that SISU are doing a great job but for the council to do this to the people they serve, at a time of hope on the pitch after years of misery is spiteful suicide. Pretty much every penny I've spent following the home and away this season counts for fk all. It usually does, but not due to off field factors - can I sue the council to recover my costs and for cimpensation to lost time?
They "care very deeply about the city's football club". Apparently.
Up in Doncaster, the local council hand over their entire stadium to the club for nothing.
Meanwhile, in Coventry the local authority tries to put its football club out of business for the sake of £1.3 million, and the locals rejoice. Me no understando
Up in Doncaster, the local council hand over their entire stadium to the club for nothing.
Meanwhile, in Coventry the local authority tries to put its football club out of business for the sake of £1.3 million, and the locals rejoice. Me no understando
Non payment of debts is not an illegal act in this country, indeed it isn't in any western society.
When the term 'illegal' is used it is usually taken to mean that criminal laws have been broken (and that's what I believed you were saying in the original post). Failing to pay your rent does not fall into that category.
As for the rest of my response, many others have tried to form an argument based on what they perceive to be the truth, but haven't done a very good job of it to be honest. The balance of opinion seems to be against your position from the responses I have read.
Unlike you, I don't claim to be the sold arbiter of the truth, I have an opinion which is based on observations, nothing more, nothing less.
Grendel have you had to change your name again?
If you're going to call everyone who disagrees with you Grendel, then I fear you might be doing it all night, because ours is far from the minority position, quite the opposite from where I sit.
If you're going to call everyone who disagrees with you Grendel, then I fear you might be doing it all night, because ours is far from the minority position, quite the opposite from where I sit.
Maybe Doncaster are owned by people the council could trust. Is their stadium like the Ricoh?
If you think SISU are considered by the majority to be right in the way get have handled these rent negotiations leading to this situation. I am afraid you are not in a majority.
We're not debating that one side is morevwrong than the other, I think we are all aware of the misgivings of sisu, but right now they are all we have and the council are being complete tools over this.
Oh dear, seems I have pushed someone's buttons.
Stop playing semantics please:
illegal [ɪˈliːgəl]
adj1. forbidden by law; unlawful; illicit
2. unauthorized or prohibited by a code of official or accepted rules
na person who has entered or attempted to enter a country illegallyillegally adv
illegality n
Adj.1.illegal - prohibited by law or by official or accepted rules; "an illegal chess move"unlawful - contrary to or prohibited by or defiant of law; "unlawful measures"; "unlawful money"; "unlawful hunters"
illegitimate - of marriages and offspring; not recognized as lawful
irregular - contrary to rule or accepted order or general practice; "irregular hiring practices"
legal - established by or founded upon law or official or accepted rules
SISU acted illegally, were taken to the high court and were found to have acted illegally and were instructed to pay the rent by a fixed date. Failing to comply with a high court order is a further act of illegality. On the basis of these illegal acts, ACL have requested the appointment of an administrator.
Please stop trying to wriggle out of a self-eviden truth by playing with semantics.
And since when did I claim to be the sole arbiter of truth? Please show me where I make this claim. Obviously I did no such thing and this is just another stupid attack to divert from facing the unpalatable truth that you do not want to face.
Go play your silly games with someone else, I have no interest in continuing this.
We didn't ask fir our soulless bowl that we never fill. Doncasters would be perfect for us, modern sensible and a level that we could fill.
Reckon you have a serious misapprehension about what people think about this, I refer you to the comments on Cov Telegraph site to gauge the general mood. Most people want this saga to end & SISU to go.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/co...lues-closer-to-administration-92746-32984785/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?