clint van damme
Well-Known Member
why can't they say something positive?!
Even The Daily Express has started changing its tune.
In a world full of dog shit newspapers the Sun is probably about the dog shittiest of them.The Sun today are calling teachers militant cowards. Clap for people saving lives but declare war on people trying to avoid spreading a virus yeah
it's the only brief that doesn't need security clearance. They couldn't give him anything else. He's lucky not to be in prison.
Now Gove has weighed in and said ‘come on it’s safe’. Arbitrary date plucked out of the air, admitting that we don’t know enough about child transmission of the virus but let’s plough in anyway. The crèche must be reopened and the babysitting service resumed
if you told me there was a group willing to risk everyones lives including children because of their ideology I'd have assumed you were talking about ISIS but here we have the UK government doing it. Be positive about it!
He then admitted everything has risk! Which is correctif you told me there was a group willing to risk everyones lives including children because of their ideology I'd have assumed you were talking about ISIS but here we have the UK government doing it. Be positive about it!
He then admitted everything has risk! Which is correct
We have gone from trying to do the opposite to everyone to trying to copy everyone else
The WHO confirmed there is minimal risk to school children - the wood from the trees is getting clearer albeit via muddy messaging. A vaccine and a cure are going to be years away - this has to be acknowledged on a global basis and then a risk management approach taken.
That’s exactly what seems to be going on here, everything is all of sudden opening up and by the 3rd June everything will be more or less back to normal apart from masks and social distancing.
This is what I really don't understand. If you must have them earlier, try to reach agreement where summer holidays are moved earlier. I appreciate it's short notice, but not like anybody'll be going on holiday for a bit!From a school perspective every teacher has to be back in a classroom for the next school year so it would have probably have been more sensible to do it from August with the staged approach and not June
From a school perspective every teacher has to be back in a classroom for the next school year so it would have probably have been more sensible to do it from August with the staged approach and not June
Thanks for sacrificing my holiday for me
You’ll could have your holidays from earlier. Your response merely re-enforces stereotyping I’m afraid unless it’s a joke
This is what I really don't understand. If you must have them earlier, try to reach agreement where summer holidays are moved earlier. I appreciate it's short notice, but not like anybody'll be going on holiday for a bit!
Also allows some actual planbning as the best way to do it - just to bung them back with no thought is careless at best.
Believe it or not but it’s actually 3rd June for EU countries and no quarantine, I presume the UK is included in this too based upon current rules.Even holidays to Italy allowed from late June which seems slightly strange - I definitely will not be going to an airport for some time
I don’t disagree I just wanted a consistent answerThe WHO confirmed there is minimal risk to school children - the wood from the trees is getting clearer albeit via muddy messaging. A vaccine and a cure are going to be years away - this has to be acknowledged on a global basis and then a risk management approach taken.
Scientists divided over coronavirus risk to children if schools reopenI don’t disagree I just wanted a consistent answer
Exactly the scientists can not decide on the risks.The biggest problem with sending kids back to school is although the risk to them themselves might be low the problem is we still don’t really understand the risks associated with them spreading it.
Exactly the scientists can not decide on the risks.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Certainly more important economically than the government will ever admitIt’s because we don’t know enough biologically about the transmission and seem heavily reliant on statistics. If it emerges that children have no involvement in transmissions on May 31st you can bet the government will act like they knew all along.
Could it actually be that we are viewed not as educators but as glorified babysitters?
How very cynical of you.It’s because we don’t know enough biologically about the transmission and seem heavily reliant on statistics. If it emerges that children have no involvement in transmissions on May 31st you can bet the government will act like they knew all along.
Could it actually be that we are viewed not as educators but as glorified babysitters?
Certainly more important economically than the government will ever admit
Even holidays to Italy allowed from late June which seems slightly strange - I definitely will not be going to an airport for some time
Don't be so irrational. You are more likely to die on the way to the airport.
He doesn’t want to go to an airport but wants me in a classroom
Don't be so irrational. You are more likely to die on the way to the airport.
I was thinking more of the queues and riff raff to be honest - you have to pitch a tent to get a coffee at Starbucks
are you being furloughed?
Fast track through passport control, book a lounge pass and get priority boarding. I thought you were minted. You can even get a free lounge pass through your bank, so long as you have enough money in the bank of course.I was thinking more of the queues and riff raff to be honest - you have to pitch a tent to get a coffee at Starbucks
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?