stupot07
Well-Known Member
That's a different argument from Brightons league status.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
But we are in division 3. If we were playing at the Ricoh we would have one of the highest turnovers. But because we are playing in Northampton we have the lowest. If we hadn't made such a stupid move we could have afforded to replace Clarke properly and could easily still be pushing for promotion.
So they are to blame for a manager making the wrong subs?
People should have learnt about this from the thorn situation where managers and players are blameless because of big bad sisi
Maybe the subs saved us from losing by more, we'll never know for sure. How many more games should Pressley be given before he's sacked?
So they are to blame for a manager making the wrong subs?
People should have learnt about this from the thorn situation where managers and players are blameless because of big bad sisi
I didn't say anything about sacking him did I?
Big bad SISI?
I get you. It is the fault of CCC that our squad isn't big enough or good enough....for instance our defence........because they charged too much rent.
No, and neither did I say you did. I guess you're just feeling guilty because you were thinking it?
Maybe the subs saved us from losing by more, we'll never know for sure. How many more games should Pressley be given before he's sacked?
Like the freebie everybody was moaning that we sold? Did he say he was a hero or just a better option.
It's this sort of crap that kept.thorn in a job so long.
Where did I say that? It's the fault of the manager for poor decisions sometimes.
So, if every club maximises it's allowable loses then having one of the lowest turnovers mean you have one of the lowest budgets. Therefore turnover is hugely important.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
A manager is limited to using the players he is allowed to have in his squad. Is it his fault that he has a shit defence to choose from? If not then it is the fault of SISU. If it is then he deserves the sack as we have leaked goals all season.
A manager is limited to using the players he is allowed to have in his squad. Is it his fault that he has a shit defence to choose from? If not then it is the fault of SISU. If it is then he deserves the sack as we have leaked goals all season.
So, if every club maximises it's allowable loses then having one of the lowest turnovers mean you have one of the lowest budgets. Therefore turnover is hugely important.
Didn't he sign two of them? It's the same argument as with thorn, people are too blind with hate
Didn't he sign two of them? It's the same argument as with thorn, people are too blind with hate
Correct; which is what makes the Sixfields farce so spiteful and corrosive. But, if you understand this - and you claim to do so - you should be decrying it from the rooftops.
And you don't. You may claim you don't favour it; but 90% of the readers on here will know the nature of your posts to be more 'understanding' of the actions of our owners than their actions deserve
Signed two of them with limited funds. Would they have been his first choice if he had the average to spend in this division?
Too blind with hate? Not blind enough to notice that either we have been held back with players not good enough or a manager not good enough. And I think it is more that the players are not good enough. Is this down to SP not knowing a good enough player or not having the funds to get good enough players in? I put it down to funds.
Wonder who the loans are that he's not happy with, and if the players coming to the end of their contract (presumably Christie and Moussa) aren't pulling their weight, why are they in the starting 11?
I don't agree with what they have done, I've just out what I think their reasons/viewpoint is on it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Didn't he sign two of them? It's the same argument as with thorn, people are too blind with hate
There is no sensible rationale behind playing in Northampton. Next season's squad will be abysmal based on this year's pathetic crowds and an utter humiliation is on the cards courtesy of these clowns.
There is no sensible rationale behind playing in Northampton. Next season's squad will be abysmal based on this year's pathetic crowds and an utter humiliation is on the cards courtesy of these clowns.
Yep, I'm still hoping for a Ricoh return next season. Hopefully the JR will focus some minds.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
There is the not impossible prospect of going to Nuneaton next season as underdogs. Anybody thinking of defending the owners should strongly consider that.
If baker was dire, why did he not come off? It is shit like that that can't be blamed on sisu and is down to the manager.
So they are to blame for a manager making the wrong subs?
People should have learnt about this from the thorn situation where managers and players are blameless because of big bad sisU.
But they are the ones who are or are not investing in our club?
So go and use a lot of kids if it works out it was our idea with the help of Waggot if it doesn't it was all your idea.
Funny that what has happened to wonder waggot in the last few months.
So yes he is to blame for substitutions but when you have about 16 players to choose from you really don't have a lot of choice do you...
Keep the same team lose your fault change it around with players of the same or less ability lose its your fault.
We could have JC here would still be the same..
Then again if I give them my Dinner money and buy a coffee at shitfields maybe they would be able to buy some more players of the same standard?
Joe Murphy must feel like his back 4 are out to get him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?